Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T01:36:00.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Soil metal/metalloid concentrations in the Clyde Basin, Scotland, UK: implications for land quality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2018

F. M. Fordyce*
Affiliation:
British Geological Survey, The Lyell Centre, Research Avenue South, Edinburgh EH14 4AP, UK. Email: fmf@bgs.ac.uk
P. A. Everett
Affiliation:
British Geological Survey, The Lyell Centre, Research Avenue South, Edinburgh EH14 4AP, UK. Email: fmf@bgs.ac.uk
J. M. Bearcock
Affiliation:
British Geological Survey, Environmental Science Centre, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK.
T. R. Lister
Affiliation:
British Geological Survey, Environmental Science Centre, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK.
*
*Corresponding author
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An assessment of topsoil (5–20cm) metal/metalloid (hereafter referred to as metal) concentrations across Glasgow and the Clyde Basin reveals that copper, molybdenum, nickel, lead, antimony and zinc show the greatest enrichment in urban versus rural topsoil (elevated 1.7–2.1 times; based on median values). This is a typical indicator suite of urban pollution also found in other cities. Similarly, arsenic, cadmium and lead are elevated 3.2–4.3 times the rural background concentrations in topsoil from the former Leadhills mining area. Moorlands show typical organic-soil geochemical signatures, with significantly lower (P<0.05) concentrations of geogenic elements such as chromium, copper, nickel, molybdenum and zinc, but higher levels of cadmium, lead and selenium than most other land uses due to atmospheric deposition/trapping of these substances in peat. In farmland, 14% of nickel and 7% of zinc in topsoil samples exceed agricultural maximum admissible concentrations, and may be sensitive to sewage-sludge application. Conversely, 5% of copper, 17% of selenium and 96% of pH in farmland topsoil samples are below recommended agricultural production thresholds. Significant proportions of topsoil samples exceed the most precautionary (residential/allotment) human-exposure soil guidelines for chromium (18% urban; 10% rural), lead (76% urban; 45% rural) and vanadium (87% urban; 56% rural). For chromium, this reflects volcanic bedrock and the history of chromite ore processing in the region. However, very few soil types are likely to exceed new chromiumVI-based guidelines. The number of topsoil samples exceeding the guidelines for lead and vanadium highlight the need for further investigations and evidence to improve human soil-exposure risk assessments to better inform land contamination policy and regeneration.

Figure 0

Figure 1 Location of the Clyde Basin study area.

Figure 1

Figure 2 Simplified bedrock geology map of the Clyde Basin study area.

Figure 2

Figure 3 Locations of soil samples collected across the Clyde Basin from urban, rural and mineralised land-use domains.

Figure 3

Table 1 List of parameters determined in the G-BASE Clyde Basin topsoil dataset.

Figure 4

Table 2 Percentage of variance in Glasgow topsoil samples attributable to between-site, between-sample and residual variance. N=number of replicate pairs. All data log-transformed.

Figure 5

Table 3 Recommended parameter thresholds for agricultural soil. Abbreviations: Deficiency = no deficiency expected threshold; MAC = maximum admissible concentration.

Figure 6

Table 4 Percentage of Clyde Basin rural and urban topsoils exceeding most precautionary UK soil guideline values and recommended industry standards.

Figure 7

Figure 4 Map of loss on ignition in topsoil of the Clyde Basin.

Figure 8

Figure 5 Box and whisker plots showing the 10th, 25th 50th 75th and 90th percentiles of parameter distributions in rural topsoil collected over Devonian–Carboniferous rock types and urban Clyde Basin topsoil. RuralD–C = samples over Devonian and Carboniferous rock types as rural background.

Figure 9

Figure 6 Map of topsoil pH across the Clyde Basin.

Figure 10

Figure 7 Box and whisker plots showing the 10th, 25th 50th 75th and 90th percentiles of parameter distributions in topsoil over various land-use types. Abbreviations: AGRI = agriculture; DL = derelict land; IND = industry; MIN = Mining; MOOR = moorland; PARK = recreational; RES = residential open space; RESG = garden/allotment; ROAD = road/rail; SCH = school; WOOD = woodland.

Figure 11

Table 5 Summary statistics for selected parameter concentrations in Clyde Basin topsoil and soil elsewhere. Abbreviations: LOI=loss on ignition; RuralD-C=rural topsoil collected over Devonian and Carboniferous rock types as rural background to urban soils; N = number of samples; Glasgow parks=27 samples from Glasgow Green and Alexandria Park (Madrid et al. 2006); Glasgow topsoil=397 0–5-cm-depth samples on 800m grid across Glasgow (Gibson & Farmer 1983); Scotland topsoil=Paterson et al. (2003) and Paterson (2011), except Se=Fordyce et al. (2010) (114 samples from 44 farms) and Shand et al. (2010) (47 samples); England and Wales topsoil=Rawlins et al. (2012); world soils=Reimann & Caritat (1998). Note: pH value normalised by −0.5 units to take into account difference between water and CaCl2 slurry methods of analysis (Rowell 1997).

Figure 12

Table 6 Pearson correlation matrix of selected elements in Clyde Basin rural and urban topsoil. Abbreviation: LOI=loss on ignition. Italic text=not statistically significant (r=0.062; P<0.05); bold text=strong (r>0.600) correlation (Stockburger 2001). All data except Fe and pH log-transformed.

Figure 13

Table 7 Comparison of mineralised and non-mineralised soil domains. Mineralised=one soil from Nutberry Hill for As; all other soils from Leadhills (Fig. 3); Non-min rural LHS=subset of non-mineralised soils over the Leadhills Super Group rock unit as rural background to the mineralised soils.

Figure 14

Table 8 ANOVA comparison of selected topsoil element mean concentrations over 11 different land-use types. All data log-transformed prior to analysis. Null hypothesis H0 rejected at significance level P<0.05.

Figure 15

Table 9 Post-hoc Tukey HSD comparison of selected topsoil element mean concentrations over 11 different land-use types. Abbreviations: LSM = least squares mean; AGRI = agriculture; DL = derelict land; IND = industry; MIN = Mining; MOOR = moorland; PARK = recreational; RES = residential open space; RESG = garden/allotment; ROAD = road/rail; SCH = school; WOOD = woodland. All data log-transformed prior to analysis. Groups = groups of factor levels. For each element, land-use LSMs that do not share the same letter are significantly different (P<0.05).

Figure 16

Figure 8 Map of total As concentrations in Clyde Basin topsoil.

Figure 17

Figure 9 Bar charts of selected median element concentrations in urban topsoil from Glasgow compared to other large UK cities. Based on data from Fordyce et al. (2005), BGS (2011) and this study.

Figure 18

Figure 10 Map of total Cd concentrations in Clyde Basin topsoil.

Figure 19

Figure 11 Map of total Cr concentrations in Clyde Basin topsoil.

Figure 20

Figure 12 Map of total Ni concentrations in Clyde Basin topsoil.

Figure 21

Figure 13 Map of total Pb concentrations in Clyde Basin topsoil.

Figure 22

Figure 14 Map of total Se concentrations in Clyde Basin topsoil.