Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-cbk24 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T19:44:55.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Coupling between the atmospheric circulation and extremes of the mass balance of Storglaciären, northern Scandinavia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Veijo Allan Pohjola
Affiliation:
Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210-1002,
Jeffrey C. Rogers
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210-1361, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A large amount of glacier mass-balance data has been gathered during the last few decades. One of the ultimate goals with these data is to reveal changes in climate, recorded by the sensitive climatic gauges that glaciers are. How can we use the collected mass-balance data to retrieve knowledge of changes in climate and in the atmospheric circulation? One method is to examine the extremes of the summer and winter balance years from a glacier or a glaciated area, and from these reconstruct the mean synoptic situation for those years. We focus here on the long 50 year continuous mass-balance record from Storglaciären, northern Scandinavia, and analyze the extreme events in the data set. The results show that high net balance is favoured by stronger westerly air flow (more maritime influence) which increases accumulation in winter but reduces ablation in summer.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1997 
Figure 0

Fig. 1.Mass balance of Storglaciären, 1946–95.

Figure 1

Table. 1.The 13 highest and lowest winter (bw) and summer balance (bs) years from Storglaciären Water fluxes and chemical weathering rates at Finsterwalderbreen

Figure 2

Fig. 2.(a) SLP for high accumulation in winter, (b) SLP for low accumulation in winter, (c) 500 hPa height fot high accumulation in winter, (d) 500 hPa height for low accumulation in winter.

Figure 3

Fig. 3.(a) SLP for summers with large ablation. (b) SLP for summers with small ablation, (c) 500 h Pa height for summers with large ablation. (d) 500 hPa height for summers with small ablation.

Figure 4

Fig. 4.(a) Differences in SLP between high-and low-accumulation winters. (b) Differences in 500 hPa height between high and low -accumulation winters. (c) Summer SLP differences in ablation. (d) Summer 500 hPa height differences in ablation.