Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T19:08:35.378Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Texture-engineered ceramics—Property enhancements through crystallographic tailoring

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2017

Gary L. Messing*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
Stephen Poterala
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
Yunfei Chang
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
Tobias Frueh
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
Elizabeth R. Kupp
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
Beecher H. Watson III
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
Rebecca L. Walton
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
Michael J. Brova
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
Anna-Katharina Hofer
Affiliation:
Institut für Struktur- und Funktionskeramik, Montanuniversitaet Leoben, Leoben 8700, Austria
Raul Bermejo
Affiliation:
Institut für Struktur- und Funktionskeramik, Montanuniversitaet Leoben, Leoben 8700, Austria
Richard J. Meyer Jr.
Affiliation:
Applied Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: messing@ems.psu.edu

Abstract

Texture-engineered ceramics enable access to a vast array of novel texture-property relations leading to property values ranging between those of single crystals and isotropic bulk ceramics. Recently developed templated grain growth and magnetic alignment texturing methods yield high quality crystallographic texture, and thus significant advances in achievable texture-engineered properties in magnetic, piezoelectric, electronic, optical, thermoelectric, and structural ceramics. In this paper, we outline the fundamental basis for these texture-engineered properties and review recent contributions to the field of texture-engineered ceramics with an update on the properties of textured lead-free and lead-based piezoelectrics. We propose that further property improvements can be realized through development of processes that improve crystallographic alignment of the grain structure, create biaxial texture, and explore a wider array of crystallographic orientations. There is a critical need to model the physics of texture-engineered ceramics, and more comprehensively characterize texture, thus enabling testing of texture orientation-property relations and materials performance. We believe that in situ measurements of texture evolution can lead to a more fundamental and comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms of texture development.

Information

Type
Invited Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017 
Figure 0

FIG. 1. Schematic illustrations and stereographic projections of fiber and sheet textures in a hypothetical biaxial (e.g., orthorhombic) ceramic.

Figure 1

FIG. 2. Electromagnetic, mechanical and thermal processing methods utilized to produce grain alignment in ceramic materials. Most commonly used processing methods are shown in bold.

Figure 2

FIG. 3. Schematic of the RABiTS process. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 11.

Figure 3

FIG. 4. Schematic of the TGG and reactive TGG process. The in situ topochemical conversion texturing process was first reported by Tani,13 whereas the oriented seeding of a phase transformation texturing process was developed by Yilmaz et al.14

Figure 4

FIG. 5. Evaluation of texture by (a) X-ray diffraction analysis using the Lotgering factor, (b) full-width at half-maximum peak analysis, (c) pole figure analysis and (d) EBSD for [001] textured PMN–28PT. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 20.

Figure 5

FIG. 6. MRD functions for different r values where each line represents a hypothetical March–Dollase fit for a particular quality of texture.

Figure 6

FIG. 7. Hysteresis loops (upper half only) of an isotropic Ferroxdure sample sintered at a high temperature measured parallel and perpendicular to the preferred direction (c-axis). The magnetic texture closely resembles that of a single crystal. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 24.

Figure 7

FIG. 8. Room temperature magnetic hysteresis loops of CoFe2O4 ceramics after sintering at 1150 °C for 4 h: (a) untextured and (b) textured along the [001] direction. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 26.

Figure 8

FIG. 9. The critical current density as a function of total grain boundary misorientation angle for both YBa2Cu3O7−x (YBCO) films deposited on SrTiO3 bicrystal substrates and polycrystalline YBCO wires. The solid line is a fit to the bicrystal data. The data were taken at 77 K and self-field. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 31.

Figure 9

FIG. 10. Schematic diagram of (a) a single crystal piezoelectric device with [001], [110] or [111] orientations, (b) a textured polycrystalline ceramic with the same orientation, and (c) some domain-engineered states such as “4R”, “4O”, “2T”, and “3T”.

Figure 10

TABLE I. Piezoelectric coefficients (d33) of [001] textured lead-based ceramics and isotropic ceramics.

Figure 11

TABLE II. Piezoelectric coefficients (d33) of [001] textured lead-free ceramics and isotropic ceramics.

Figure 12

FIG. 11. Comparison of the high field response of [001]c textured 0.28PIN–0.40PMN–0.32PT ceramic with untextured ceramic and single crystal.100

Figure 13

FIG. 12. Transmittance data for (a) textured ceramic and (b) untextured ceramic SBN60 relative to a SBN60 single crystal. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 159.

Figure 14

TABLE III. Optical transmission and texture quality of magnetically oriented textured ceramics.

Figure 15

FIG. 13. SEM micrographs of polished and plasma etched surfaces of textured β-Si3N4. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 172.

Figure 16

FIG. 14. (a) Model to predict crack deflection or penetration in textured microstructures with and without residual stresses. The curve Gd/Gp represents the ratio between the critical energy release rate of the potential deflected crack (Gd) and the critical energy release rate of the potential penetrating crack (Gp). The large dot on the y axis is the ratio of interfacial fracture resistance between two templates and the fracture resistance of the grain, i.e., Γi/Gc. (b) SEM micrograph showing the crack path (delamination) within a textured layer under compressive stress. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 181.

Figure 17

FIG. 15. Microstructures of laminar alumina composites prepared by altering the direction of the electric field relative to the magnetic field during electrophoretic deposition in a strong magnetic field. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 17.

Supplementary material: File

Messing supplementary material S1

Supplementary Table

Download Messing supplementary material S1(File)
File 26 KB
Supplementary material: File

Messing supplementary material S2

Messing supplementary material

Download Messing supplementary material S2(File)
File 25.8 KB