Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-zsp5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T00:12:49.183Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Formaldehyde and peroxide concentrations in Law Dome (Antarctica) firn and ice cores

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2017

R. W. Gillett
Affiliation:
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Atmospheric Research, Aspendale, Victoria 3195, Australia
T. D. van Ommen
Affiliation:
Antarctic CRC and Australian Antarctic Division, Box 252-80, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia
A.V. Jackson
Affiliation:
The Environment Centre, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, England
G. P. Ayers
Affiliation:
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Atmospheric Research, Aspendale, Victoria 3195, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Peroxide speciation and formaldehyde measurements have been made on ice cores retrieved from Law Dome, Antarctica. Measurements were made for ice deposited during four different periods: modern, pre-industrial Holocene, early Holocene and Last Glacial Maximum (LGM). The data show modern peroxide levels >50% above pre-industrial levels (at ∼1.6 μmol L−1) and an absence of methyl hydroperoxide (down to a detection threshold of 0.003 μmol L−1). Formaldehyde levels show a 40% increase from pre-industrial to modern times (rising from ∼0.07 μmol L−1 to ∼0.10 μmol L−1), with a further increase and possible seasonality near the surface which we associate with post-depositional processes. Peroxide levels in LGM ice are low, but formaldehyde concentrations are high (at ∼0.13 μmol L−1) relative to modern levels. Similar high levels of formaldehyde are seen in early Holocene ice (∼6900 years BP).

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 2000
Figure 0

Fig. 1.Comparison of total peroxides and hydrogen peroxide concentrations in ice cores, 1980–85.

Figure 1

Fig. 2.Mean H2O2 and HCHO concentrations with age. Error bars are one standard deviation amplitude, computed from estimated interannual variability as described in the text.

Figure 2

Table 1.Sampling parameters

Figure 3

Table 2.Summary of results

Figure 4

Fig. 3.Concentration of hydrogen peroxide (upper trace) and formaldehyde (lower trace) 1980–85 and 1993–96.