Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-th4rj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T03:07:40.948Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The molecular basis of frontotemporal dementia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2009

Manuela Neumann
Affiliation:
Institute of Neuropathology, University Hospital of Zürich, Switzerland.
Markus Tolnay
Affiliation:
Institute of Pathology, Department of Neuropathology, University of Basel, Switzerland.
Ian R.A. Mackenzie*
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
*
*Corresponding author: Ian R.A. Mackenzie, Department of Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital, 855 West 12th Avenue, Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9, Canada. Tel: +1 604 875 4480; Fax: +1 604 875 5707; E-mail: ian.mackenzie@vch.ca
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a clinical syndrome with a heterogeneous molecular basis. Familial FTD has been linked to mutations in several genes, including those encoding the microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT), progranulin (GRN), valosin-containing protein (VCP) and charged multivescicular body protein 2B (CHMP2B). The associated neuropathology is characterised by selective degeneration of the frontal and temporal lobes (frontotemporal lobar degeneration, FTLD), usually with the presence of abnormal intracellular protein accumulations. The current classification of FTLD neuropathology is based on the identity of the predominant protein abnormality, in the belief that this most closely reflects the underlying pathogenic process. Major subgroups include those characterised by the pathological tau, TDP-43, intermediate filaments and a group with cellular inclusions composed of an unidentified ubiquitinated protein. This review will focus on the current understanding of the molecular basis of each of the major FTLD subtypes. It is anticipated that this knowledge will provide the basis of future advances in the diagnosis and treatment of FTD.

Information

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009
Figure 0

Table 1.Recommended nomenclature for frontotemporal lobar degenerations

Figure 1

Figure 1.Tau isoforms and tau gene mutations. (a) Six isoforms of the tau protein found in the adult human brain result from alternative splicing of exons 2 (red), 3 (green) and 10 (yellow). Exons 9–12 encode imperfectly repeated microtubule-binding repeats (shown in black). (b) Mutations in the tau gene in frontotemporal dementia and parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17 (FTDP-17T). Thirty-six coding region mutations in exons (E) 1 and 9–13 and eight intronic mutations flanking exon 10 are shown.

Figure 2

Figure 2.Pathological features in FTLD-tau. (a) Severe atrophy of the frontal and temporal lobes and (b) Pick bodies in the temporal cortex of a patient with Pick disease. (c) Tufted astrocyte and (d) a globose tangle in a case with progressive supranuclear palsy. (e) Astrocytic plaque as a hallmark lesion of corticobasal degeneration. (f) Abundant argyrophilic grains in the hippocampus of a patient with argyrophilic grain disease. (g) Neurofibrillary tangles and neuropil threads in the frontal cortex of a case with frontal variant Alzheimer disease. Arrow indicates a neuritic plaque. (h) Tau pathology in sector CA2 of the hippocampus in hippocampal sclerosis dementia. (i) Neuronal and glial tau pathology in the frontal cortex of a patient with an intron 10 +3 splice-site mutation in the tau gene. b, d, e, f, h, tau immunohistochemistry; c, g, i, Gallyas-Braak silver stain. Scale bars: 50 µm.

Figure 3

Figure 3.TDP-43 and pathological spectrum of FTLD-TDP. (a) Schematic diagram of TDP-43 with its characteristic functional domains. (b) TDP-43-positive cytoplasmic inclusions in the dentate granule cells. Note the absence of normal nuclear staining in cells with cytoplasmic inclusions (arrows). (c) Immunoblot analysis of urea fractions isolated from FTLD-TDP brain shows the highly characteristic biochemical signature with pathological bands at 25 kDa (*), 45 kDa (**) and a high molecular mass smear (***), in addition to the normal TDP-43 band. (d) Based on morphological parameters, four FTLD-TDP subtypes can be delineated, each of which correlates with specific clinical phenotype and genetic abnormalities. Scale bars: 20 µm (b, d). Abbreviations: RRM, RNA recognition motif; NLS, nuclear localisation sequence; NES, nuclear export sequence.

Figure 4

Figure 4.Pathological spectrum of FTLD-UPS. An aFTLD-U case with ubiquitin-immunoreactive cytoplasmic (a) and intranuclear inclusions (b, c) in dentate granule cells. (d) The cytoplasmic inclusions are also immunoreactive for p62 but the intranuclear inclusions are not. (e) Familial FTD caused by CHMP2B mutations (FTD-3) also have ubiquitin-positive cytoplasmic inclusions in the dentate granule cells. a–c, e, ubiquitin immunohistochemistry; d, p62 immunohistochemistry. Scale bar: 20 µm (a, d, e); 10 µm (b, c).

Figure 5

Figure 5.Neuropathology of rare FTLD subtypes. (a–d) Neuronal intermediate filament inclusion disease. The most common type of inclusion is Pick-body-like inclusions that are visible with haematoxylin and eosin stain (a) and immunoreactive for α-internexin (b). Hyaline conglomerate inclusions are also present (c) and are immunoreactive for phosphorylated neurofilament (d). (e) Neuronal intranuclear inclusions that are present in some cases of FTLD-IF are strongly immunoreactive for ubiquitin but do not stain for intermediate filaments. Note the presence of a Pick-body-like inclusion in the cytoplasm of the same neuron. (f) Typical inclusion of basophilic inclusion body disease. Scale bar: 20 µm (a, c–f); 40 µm (b).