Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T17:36:01.638Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Accepted manuscript

Navigating Epistemic Monocultures in AI-Driven Science: A Simulation Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2026

Sina Fazelpour*
Affiliation:
Northeastern University, Boston, United States
Joseph O’Brien
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego, United States
Hannah Rubin
Affiliation:
University of Missouri, Columbia, United States
*
*Corresponding author: Sina Fazelpour; s.fazel-pour@northeastern.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Accessibility of Accepted Manuscripts

Accepted Manuscripts are early, peer-reviewed versions that have not yet been copyedited, typeset, or formally published and may not meet all accessibility standards. A fully formatted accessible version will follow.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

AI integration into scientific communities promises accelerated discovery but raises concerns about detrimental homogenization. We develop an NK landscape model to explore these promises and risks.We find that non-personalized AI systems that offer uniform guidance yield benefits only under a narrow conjunction of problem structure, practices, and baseline research capabilities, becoming harmful otherwise. We implement two proposed mitigations: randomization and personalization. While randomization’s utility remains restricted to decomposable problems, personalization can enhance diversity, enabling benefits across a broader range of conditions. Crucially, these benefits are not automatic: they depend on effective institutional adaptation, requiring new standards, protocols, and practices.

Information

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Philosophy of Science Association