Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T04:41:49.321Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Field arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculation increased plant performance without phosphorus fertilizer supply of four promoted upland rice varieties in Madagascar

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2022

Naliharilala Miora Rakotoarivelo Njaramanana
Affiliation:
Ecole doctorale Agriculture, Elevage et Environnement, Université d’Antananarivo, Antananarivo, Madagascar
Volatsara Baholy Rahetlah
Affiliation:
Ecole doctorale Agriculture, Elevage et Environnement, Université d’Antananarivo, Antananarivo, Madagascar
Jean Trap
Affiliation:
Eco&Sols, IRD, INRAE, CIRAD, Institut Agro, Université Montpellier, Montpellier, France
Patrice Autfray*
Affiliation:
CIRAD, UPR AIDA, F-34398 Montpellier, France AIDA, Université Montpellier, Montpellier, France
*
*Corresponding author. Email: autfray@cirad.fr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In Madagascar, upland rice cropping is constrained by soil acidity and low phosphorus (P) bioavailability. Given their role in plant P nutrition, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) may improve crop yield in nutrient-poor tropical soils. In the Vakinankaratra region, a field experiment was conducted at 908 m asl on an acidic Ferralsol during the 2019–2020 growing season. The aim was to test the ability of four promoted rice varieties to respond to AMF seed-coating inoculation with a commercial strain of Rhizophagus irregularis in the absence or presence of P fertilizer (20 kg ha−1 of P2O5) under no expected nitrogen (N) limitation. In absence of P fertilization, both at tillering and at maturity and irrespective of the rice varieties, AMF inoculation significantly improved plant performance and finally grain yield, grain N, and grain P amounts by an average of 28%, 30%, and 39%, respectively. In contrast, when P fertilizer was supplied, no significant effect of AMF inoculation was observed. Rice growth variables were significantly higher with the application of P fertilizer than with AMF inoculation both at tillering and at maturity. P fertilizer without inoculation provided an average grain yield improvement of 85%. At tillering, mycorrhizal parameters for root colonization assessment were not positively linked with rice growth variables suggesting an early effect of AMF inoculation. We concluded that, with no P fertilization, AMF seed coating inoculation at the field scale significantly improved upland rice plant performance in a limited soil P environment. Our rice genetic variability did not interfere significantly both with mycorrhizal parameters and crop AMF inoculation benefits.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1 Main characteristics of the four rice varieties tested in the experiment

Figure 1

Table 2 Results of ANOVAs of mycorrhizal parameters at tillering and means for treatments ± standard error; F (%) is the Arbuscular Mycorrhizal (AM) frequency of the root system, M (%) is the AM intensity of the root system, m (%) is AM Intensity of the mycorrhized fragments, a (%) is the arbuscular AM abundance of the mycorrhized fragments and A (%) is the AM arbuscular abundance of the root system

Figure 2

Table 3 Results of ANOVAs of rice growth variables at tillering and at maturity; shoot and straw dry matter (DM) biomass; amounts of N, P; grain yield expressed at 13% of humidity

Figure 3

Figure 1. Means and standard error for the number of tillers (A), dry matter biomass (B), nitrogen (C), and phosphorus (D) amounts of rice shoots at tillering in the four varieties under the four PI treatments; 00=no fertilizer and no inoculation; 0I = no fertilizer and inoculation; P0 = fertilizer and no inoculation; PI = fertilizer and inoculation; ± standard error; different lowercase letters represent significant differences related to the P and I interaction while uppercase letters represent significant differences related to the P factor at the 5% level.

Figure 4

Figure 2. Means and standard error for number of tillers (A), dry matter straw biomass (B), nitrogen (C), and phosphorus (D) amounts in rice straw at maturity in the four varieties under the four PI treatments; 00 = no fertilizer and no inoculation; 0I = no fertilizer but with inoculation; P0 = with fertilizer but no inoculation; PI = fertilizer and inoculation; ± standard error; different lowercase letters represent significant differences related to the P and I interaction while uppercase letters represent significant differences related to the P factor at the 5% level.

Figure 5

Figure 3. Means and standard error for grain yield (13% humidity) (A), nitrogen (B), and phosphorus (C) grain amounts of rice at maturity in the four varieties under the four PI treatments; 00 = no fertilizer and no inoculation; 0I = no fertilizer but with inoculation; P0 = fertilizer but no inoculation; PI = fertilizer and inoculation; ± standard error; different lowercase letters represent significant differences related to the P and I interaction while uppercase letters represent significant differences related to the P factor at the 5% level.

Figure 6

Figure 4. Principal component analysis (PCA) with the 11 growth plant active variables (red arrows); at tillering, number of tillers per m−2 (T.T), dry matter straw biomass in t ha−1 (T.S), straw nitrogen amount in kg ha−1 (T.NS), straw phosphorus amount in kg ha−1 (T.PS); at rice maturity, number of tillers per m−2 (M.T), dry matter straw biomass in t ha−1 (M.S), straw nitrogen amount (M.NS), straw phosphorus amount (M.PS), grain yield at 13% humidity (M.G), nitrogen (M.NG), and phosphorus (M.PG) grain amounts in kg ha−1; the five AMF parameters nonactive variables are in blue arrows, F (% of AM frequency of the root system), M (% of AM intensity of the root system), m (% of AM intensity of the mycorrhized fragments), a (% of arbuscular abundance of the mycorrhized fragments), A (% of arbuscular abundance in the root system); the 4 different 16 colored individuals and 4 different ellipses at the 95% level represent the 4 PI treatments; 00 (no phosphorus and no inoculation), 0I (no phosphorus but with inoculation), P0 (with phosphorus but no inoculation), and PI (inoculation and phosphorus).