Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T17:50:59.190Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Oxide thermoelectrics: The challenges, progress, and outlook

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2011

Jian He*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, 29634-0978
Yufei Liu
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, 29634-0978
Ryoji Funahashi
Affiliation:
Nanotechnology Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Ikeda, Osaka 563-8577, Japan; and CREST, Japan Science and Technology Agency, Sanbancho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 102-0075, Japan
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: jianhe@clemson.edu

Abstract

Most state-of-the-art thermoelectric (TE) materials contain heavy elements Bi, Pb, Sb, or Te and exhibit maximum figure of merit, ZT∼1–2. On the other hand, oxides were believed to make poor TEs because of the low carrier mobility and high lattice thermal conductivity. That is why the discoveries of good p-type TE properties in layered cobaltites NaxCoO2, Ca4Co3O9, and Bi2Sr2Co2O9, and promising n-type TE properties in CaMnO3- and SrTiO3-based perovskites and doped ZnO, broke new ground in thermoelectrics study. The past two decades have witnessed more than an order of magnitude enhancement in ZT of oxides. In this article, we briefly review the challenges, progress, and outlook of oxide TE materials in their different forms (bulk, epitaxial film, superlattice, and nanocomposites), with a greater focus on the nanostructuring approach and the late development of the oxide-based TE module.

Information

Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011
Figure 0

FIG. 1. (a) Schematic comparison of various thermoelectric (TE) materials for applications of waste heat harvest and refrigeration, in terms of the temperature range of operation and the abundance and environmental friendliness of constituent elements. (b) The abundance of elements used in TE materials, the elements represented by dark-colored columns are <1 ppm.

Figure 1

FIG. 2. Schematic crystal structures of the layered cobaltites (a) NaxCoO2, (b) Ca3Co4O9, and (c) BiSrCoO. (From Ref. 33. Copyright Materials Research Society, reproduced with permission.)

Figure 2

FIG. 3. High-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscope image and Ti-L2,3 edge electron energy loss spectroscopy profile. (From Ref. 16. Copyright American Chemical Society, reproduced with permission.)

Figure 3

FIG. 4. (a) Depth profile across the heterointerface between a TiO2 epitaxial layer and the SrTiO3 substrate. (b) Schematic drawing of the heterointerface crystal structure. (From Ref. 16. Copyright American Chemical Society, reproduced with permission.)

Figure 4

FIG. 5. Main panel: electron microscopy image of self-assembled nanocheckerboard and nanoherring structures within a Zn(Ga,Mn)O4 grain. Upper-right inset: corresponding electron diffraction pattern indexed with the cubic lattice; upper-left inset: high-resolution image of the checkerboard pattern (the scale bar is 5 nm). (From Ref. 107. Copyright Japan Society of Applied Physics, reproduced with permission.)

Figure 5

FIG. 6. (a) Pictures of oxide/Bi2Te3 cascade module and (b) the dependence of maximum power output on the heater temperature.

Figure 6

FIG. 7. The timeline of representative p-type and n-type TE oxides and their maximum figure of merit values. The number in the bracket is the reference number.