Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T03:30:49.353Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Insulator–metal transition and the hopping transport in epitaxial Sm0.6Nd0.4NiO3 thin films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

Badr Torriss
Affiliation:
INRS-EMT, Université du Québec, 1650 Lionel-Boulet, C. P. 1020, Varennes Québec, J3X 1S2, Canada
Joëlle Margot
Affiliation:
Département de Physique, Université de Montréal, CP. 6128 Succ. Centre-ville, Montréal, Québec H3C 3J7, Canada
Mohamed Chaker*
Affiliation:
INRS-EMT, Université du Québec, 1650 Lionel-Boulet, C. P. 1020, Varennes Québec, J3X 1S2, Canada
*
Address all correspondence to Mohamed Chaker at chaker@emt.inrs.ca

Abstract

Epitaxial Sm0.6Nd0.4NiO3 thin films were grown on different substrates by pulsed laser deposition. X-ray diffraction indicates that for SLAO substrate, strain relaxation is accompanied by the creation of oxygen vacancies. The film resistivity on LaAlO3 and SrTiO3 substrates shows a clear insulator–metal transition (IMT) at 185 and 325 K, respectively, while the film is exclusively semiconducting on SrLaAlO4. At low temperatures, the conductivity of films deposited on SrLaAlO4 and SrTiO3 is described by the Mott variable-range hopping mechanism. With increasing film thickness, progressive tensile strain relaxation takes place, which in turn results in a gradual decrease in the IMT temperature.

Information

Type
Research Letters
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 
Figure 0

Figure 1. (a) X-ray diffraction pattern of 63 nm SNNO thin films grown on different substrates. (b–d) XRD ϕ scan of the (111), (103), and (101) peaks of SNNO films on STO, LAO, and SLAO substrates, respectively. (e) Reciprocal space map around (103) reflections for SNNOpc film and STO substrate. (f–h) AFM images presenting the surface morphology of 63 nm SNNO thin films deposited on SLAO, LAO, and STO substrates, respectively.

Figure 1

Figure 2. (a) Resistivity of 63 nm SNNO films grown on different substrates as a function of temperature. (b) Derivative of resistivity [–∂log (ρ)/∂T].

Figure 2

Figure 3. (a) Representation $\sigma \sqrt T $ versus T−1/4 for 63 nm-thick SNNO samples. The red solid lines are obtained from linear fitting of the temperature below 40 K. (b, c) Temperature dependence of the average hopping energy W (eV) and of the ratio R/a for SNNO thin films.

Figure 3

Figure 4. (a) Resistivity versus temperature for SNNO films with different thicknesses grown on SrTiO3. (b) Left axis: the ratio of the unit-cell volume of the film to that of bulk SNNO as a function of thickness. Right axis: thickness dependence of the in-plane film strain εxx.