Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-skzmx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T00:16:06.832Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Preterm PDA Device closure using the KONAR MFO device in a resource-limited centre of North-East India: a Case series

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2026

Saurabhi Das
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Health City Hospital, Khanapara, Assam, India
Shantanu Jain*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Health City Hospital, Khanapara, Assam, India
Mirza M. Kamran
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Metromed International Cardiac Centre, Kozhikode, Kerala, India
Sukanya Pathak
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care, Health City Hospital, Khanapara, Assam, India
Kangkan Sharma
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiac Anesthesia, Health City Hospital, Khanapara, Assam, India
Narendra Sharma
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiac Anesthesia, Health City Hospital, Khanapara, Assam, India
*
Corresponding author: Shantanu Jain; Email: shantanu1141@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

Percutaneous device closure is the preferred method for closing patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), even in preterm infants. We report our experience using the new KONAR-MFO™ ventricular septal defect occluder for transcatheter closure of preterm patent ductus arteriosus as an alternative device in resource-limited centres.

Methodology:

Case 1: A preterm baby with Down’s syndrome and tracheobronchomalacia was born at 29 weeks, weighing 1.68 kg with multiple cardiac defects, including a 4 mm PDA and a 6 mm mid-muscular ventricular septal defect (VSD), stuck on a ventilator. Case 2: Another preterm baby born at 35 weeks, weighing 1.89 kg, with anorectal malformation and a right inguinal hernia. The echocardiogram revealed a 4 mm PDA with severe PAH. In both cases, the patent ductus arteriosus was occluded using a 6 mm × 4 mm Konar MFO device on day 14 (case 1) and day 20 (case 2).

Results:

The baby (case 1) was weaned off the ventilator and discharged on the 28th postnatal day at 2.09 kg. As for case 2, the baby was weaned off the ventilator within 2 days and discharged on day 30 at 2.23 kg. A follow-up echocardiogram of both cases confirmed a well-positioned device with no obstructions. At 18 months, in the follow-up, both babies were gaining weight and thriving.

Conclusions:

The KONAR MFO device is a safe and effective option for patent ductus arteriosus closure in preterm infants, even in resource-limited settings. Its versatility accommodates various duct sizes and morphologies, and its self-expandable design ensures easy deployment, addressing the anatomical challenges often seen in preterm infants.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. (a) Showing DTA angiogram done via hand through venous access after crossing PDA showing 4 mm PDA (arrow). (b, c) Showing deployment of the device by an antegrade route. (d) Showing small intra-device flow (arrow), (e, f) arrow showing DTA angiogram before releasing the device with no narrowing in arch and good flow in LPA.

Figure 1

Table 1. Demographic and procedural details of cases

Figure 2

Figure 2. Echocardiogram. (a) Wide open arch in 2D with unobstructed flow in aortic arch at 18 months follow-up (arrow). (b) Showing unobstructed in branch pulmonary arteries with. (c) Restricted mid-muscular VSD shunting left to right (arrow).

Figure 3

Table 2. Outcome and Follow-up analysis

Figure 4

Figure 3. (a) 900 lateral angiogram showing 4 mm PDA from DTA. (b, c) Deployment and positioning of 6*4 MFO KONAR device across PDA retrogradely. (d, f) Showing device in situ unobstructed flow in LPA (arrow) and arch (arrow) post deployment of device.

Figure 5

Figure 4. Echocardiogram. (a) Arrow showing device in situ with no residual shunt and unobstructed flow across arch with no luminal narrowing at 18-month follow-up. (b) Arrow showing good flow across left pulmonary artery with no gradient.

Figure 6

Table 3. Comparative analysis of various devices with current case series