Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T03:03:52.282Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Transmission electron microscopy with atomic resolution under atmospheric pressures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2017

Sheng Dai
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, USA
Wenpei Gao
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, USA
Shuyi Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, USA Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA
George W. Graham
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, USA Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA
Xiaoqing Pan*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, USA Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, USA
*
Address all correspondence to Xiaoqing Pan at xiaoqing.pan@uci.edu

Abstract

Significant developments in micro-electrical-mechanical systems-based devices for use in transmission electron microscopy (TEM) sample holders have recently led to the commercialization of windowed gas cells that now enable the atomic-resolution visualization of phenomena occurring during gas–solid interactions at atmospheric pressure. In situ TEM study under atmospheric pressures provides unique information that is beneficial to correlating the structure–properties relationship of nanomaterials, particularly under real gaseous environments. We here provide a brief introduction of the advanced instrumentation of windowed gas cells and review recent progress of in situ atomic-resolution TEM study under atmospheric pressures, including some application examples of oxidation and reduction processes, dynamic growth of nanomaterials, catalytic reactions, and “operando” TEM.

Information

Type
Prospective Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017 
Figure 0

Figure 1. Schematic representation of the instrumentation for in situ environmental TEM. (a) Differentially pumped environmental TEM. (b) TEM holder with windowed gas cell. (c) Cross-section drawing illustrating the structure of the windowed gas cell. Adapted with permission from Ref. 33. © 2016 A. Casu, et al. Published in Ref. 33 under CC BY 3.0 license. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/63269.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Design of the windowed gas cell holder for in situ TEM study. (a) MEMS-type Si chips used in the Protochips Atmosphere gas cell holder. (b) A schematic of the top view of the heating chip and a bright-field image showing a hole in the SiC ceramic, covered with SiN membrane. (c) Schematic showing the assembly of the Protochips Atmosphere gas cell holder.

Figure 2

Table I. Comparison between differentially pumped ETEM and windowed gas cell.

Figure 3

Figure 3. In situ oxidation of cobalt nanoparticles. (a) Real-time dynamics of the oxidation process. Scale bar, 10 nm. (b) Metallic core volume trajectory of particle I in (a). ① and ② mark two diffusion stagnation plateaus. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 38. Cambridge University Press, 2013.

Figure 4

Figure 4. In situ oxidation of Ag/AgCl heterostructure with air at atmospheric pressure. (a–c) SAED on a single particle after 0, 66, and 187 s reaction time with constant air flow, respectively. (d) EELS spectrum during the reaction. The red line was taken at 200 °C after 200 s of reaction time with constant air flow. The inset EELS spectrum shows the existence of oxygen in the nanoparticle as compared with the background signal from the constant air flow. (e) Image of the same particle after 293 s of reaction time with constant air flow. Scale bar, 10 nm. (f) FFT of the red region in (e). Reproduced with permission from Ref. 50. American Chemical Society, 2016.

Figure 5

Figure 5. In situ observation of Pt3Co nanoparticles in an oxidizing environment. (a) HAADF–STEM image revealing the formation of a Co-rich layer only on {111} surface of a Pt3Co nanoparticle. (b) Intensity profiles taken along the lines are indicated by the blue (profile 1) and red (profile 2) arrows in (a), respectively. The intensity of the Co column is indicated by the arrow in profile 2. (c, d) False colored BF-STEM images illustrating the periodical unit cell of the oxide layer on {111} Pt3Co surface. (e) Projection of a CoO model along the <110> zone axis. Blue and red spheres represent Co and O atoms, respectively. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 51. American Chemical Society. 2017.

Figure 6

Figure 6. In situ layer-by-layer growth of the (100) Pt shell during oxygen annealing. (a–c) Sequential HAADF images taken at 0 s, 64 s and 128 s during oxygen annealing at 300 °C, respectively. Scale bar, 2 nm. (d–f) Corresponding enlarged false-color panels of the (100) surface (indicated by red boxes) in (a–c), respectively. Yellow and blue spheres represent Pt and Co atoms, respectively. Scale bar, 5 Å. (g) Intensity profiles taken along the blue lines in (d–f), and the simulation result, respectively. The inset shows the simulated image of the three-layer Pt shell on the (100) surface. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 55. Nature Publishing Group, 2017.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Visual comparison of in situ STEM measurements of facet-specific CO-induced Pt nanoparticle surface reconstruction. Aberration-corrected STEM images of a Pt nanoparticle taken along the <110> zone axis: (a) at 423 K in 500 Torr of N2, and (b) at 423 K in 500 Torr of 5% CO in Ar (25 Torr of CO). Wulff constructions of a Pt nanoparticle based on DFT calculated surface free energies for (c) clean surfaces and (d) CO-saturated surfaces DFT-calculation result. Adapted with permission from Ref. 57. American Chemical Society, 2017.

Figure 8

Figure 8. In situ observation of the surface reconstruction of PdCu nanoparticles when exposed to 760 Torr of H2 at 600 K. (a–d) Lattice-resolved TEM images and (e–h) the corresponding FFT patterns. Scale bar, 10 nm. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 59. WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, 2016.

Figure 9

Figure 9. In situ STEM images showing a dynamic process of SMSI in Pd/TiO2 catalyst. (a) Amorphous layer formed on Pd/TiO2 sample at 250 °C under a reducing atmosphere (760 Torr of 5 vol% H2/Ar). (b) Crystalline layer formed at 500 °C for 10 min under same reducing conditions. (c) A higher magnification angular bright field-STEM (ADF-STEM) image of a section of (b) showing the TiO2 double layers. (d, e) EELS spectra extracted from a line scan of another particle, shown in (d), under 760 Torr of 5 vol% H2/Ar at 500 °C, and Ti3+ and Ti4+ reference spectra acquired from LaTiO3 and TiO2. (f–h) Number of surface layer change with respect to oxygen partial potential. Adapted with permission from Ref. 64. American Chemical Society, 2016.

Figure 10

Figure 10. In situ structural evolution following initial dissociation of CeO2 nanoparticles. (a) Sequential images taken at 650 °C in 150 Torr of O2, showing the gradual disappearance of an atom ‘cloud’ accompanied by the growth of a particle in its close vicinity, followed by particle coalescence. The dashed line is used to delineate the periphery of the atom ‘cloud’. The spacing between {111} lattice planes in the larger particle-labeled ‘21’, 3.1 Å, confirms it is CeO2. Elapsed time, in minutes, is indicated on the upper left corner of each image. Scale bars, 5 nm (10), 2 nm (15–27). (b) Appearance of sub-nanometer features in an image taken at a different area. Scale bars, 5 nm. (c) Enlarged image of the dashed line region in (b). Scale bar, 2 nm. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 66. Nature Publishing Group, 2015.

Figure 11

Figure 11. Correlation of oscillatory CO oxidation reaction data with the projected morphology of a Pt nanoparticle. (a) Time-resolved TEM images of the projected morphology of a Pt nanoparticle during CO oxidation. (b–d) Mass spectrometry of the CO, O2, and CO2 pressures (b), reaction power (c), and shape factor (d) for the Pt nanoparticle in (a) as a function of time. (e) Atomic-scale visualization of the dynamic refacetting of a Pt nanoparticle during the oscillatory CO oxidation. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 70. Nature Publishing Group, 2014.