Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T06:55:55.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Deep fluids and their role in hydrocarbon migration and oil deposit formation exemplified by supercritical СO2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2021

Sara LIFSHITS*
Affiliation:
Federal Research Center, Yakut Scientific Center, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Oil and Gas Problems SB RAS, 20, Avtodorozhnaya Str., Yakutsk, 677007, Russia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Hydrocarbon migration mechanism into a reservoir is one of the most controversial in oil and gas geology. The research aimed to study the effect of supercritical carbon dioxide (СО2) on the permeability of sedimentary rocks (carbonates, argillite, oil shale), which was assessed by the yield of chloroform extracts and gas permeability (carbonate, argillite) before and after the treatment of rocks with supercritical СО2. An increase in the permeability of dense potentially oil-source rocks has been noted, which is explained by the dissolution of carbonates to bicarbonates due to the high chemical activity of supercritical СО2 and water dissolved in it. Similarly, in geological processes, the introduction of deep supercritical fluid into sedimentary rocks can increase the permeability and, possibly, the porosity of rocks, which will facilitate the primary migration of hydrocarbons and improve the reservoir properties of the rocks. The considered mechanism of hydrocarbon migration in the flow of deep supercritical fluid makes it possible to revise the time and duration of the formation of gas–oil deposits decreasingly, as well as to explain features in the formation of various sources of hydrocarbons and observed inflow of oil into operating and exhausted wells.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Royal Society of Edinburgh
Figure 0

Figure 1 Diffraction patterns of the studied rock samples: (а) limestone; (b) argillite; (c) oil shale; (d) bituminous limestone.

Figure 1

Figure 2 Diffraction patterns of rocks tested for gas permeability: (а) carbonate rock; (b) argillite.

Figure 2

Figure 3 Cylinders for measuring gas permeability: (а) carbonate rock, (b) argillite.

Figure 3

Figure 4 Principal schema of a supercritical extraction unit.

Figure 4

Table 1 Results of experiments on chloroform extraction of rocks.

Figure 5

Figure 5 The yield of various ChB fractions before and after the treatment of low-permeability rocks with supercritical CO2.

Figure 6

Table 2 Results of measurements of gas permeability of rocks before and after supercritical extraction. Abbreviations: L = cylinder height; D = diameter; F = section area; t = filtration time; V = volume of gas passed through the sample; Р = pressure on the sample; K = gas permeability coefficient.