Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-w5hgh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T10:02:48.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fifty years of progress in understanding ice sheets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

Gordon de Q. Robin
Affiliation:
Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1ER, England
Charles Swithinbank
Affiliation:
British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge CB3 OET, England
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Over the past 50 years, ideas relating to the physical features and dynamics of ice sheets have evolved materially, primarily due to modern technological advances in the acquisition of basic data. This paper therefore does not review contemporary knowledge but records how our perception of ice sheets has changed with time. Rather than dealing with individual contributions to the understanding of ice sheets, major topics and concepts are considered against a background of earlier ideas and theories.

Both the form and extent of the surface features of ice sheets have been defined more clearly by the relatively recent use of satellite studies (imagery and altimetry). In an analogous way, radio echo-sounding has enabled the accurate calculation of ice thicknesses and the mapping of the sub-ice bedrock contours, and hence estimation of the ice volume. Studies on the dynamics of ice sheets have been enhanced by bore-hole sampling of deep ice and the determination of ice-temperature distributions, coupled with measurements of mass balance and both surface and internal ice movement. Internal deformation of ice sheets, surging, and various flow theories are considered in relation to recent modelling studies. Global geophysics inevitably includes the role of ice sheets, and therefore climatological studies and new atmospheric chemistry data, together with information on the distribution of meteorites on the Antarctic ice sheet, are considered critically.

Modern concepts of the evolution of ice sheets have substantially modified earlier ideas of the glacial geologists and have explained much that had previously mystified them.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1987
Figure 0

Fig. 1.The Greenland ice sheet.a. Surface form of ice sheet and exploratory journeys (short-dashed lines) from 1936 based on Wager (1933) in Wright (1937) with additional route and elevations from Lindsay (1935).b. General surface form used in 1986 based on Mock and Weeks (1965) and the 1965 Danish Geodetic Survey map with addition of flow lines assumed normal to contours.

Figure 1

Fig. 2.The Antarctic ice sheet.a. Known and postulated coastline and estimated flow lines from Gould (1940) interpreted from data available 50 years ago.b. Current map of surface form and flow lines from Drewry (1983).

Figure 2

Fig. 3.Surface elevation of the Greenland ice sheet from satellite altimetry.a. Surface elevations from Seasat radar altimetry showing 100 m contours to 2400 m and 50 m contours above that level. Delineation of major drainage basins based on surface topography by R.A. Bindschadler (from Zwally, 1984).b. 10 m contours in the vicinity of the central ice divide near Crete station (CR on map). Dotted tracks show data points used for contouring. Based on an unpublished map of Cundestrup.

Figure 3

Fig. 4.Radio-echo profile from central Antarctica along the flow line AB of Figure 5. Flow starts from an ice divide to the right of the margin at 230 km. On the left is a sub-ice “lake” near Vostok. Velocities of movement shown above the profile are estimated from a steady-state flow model and are consistent with that measured astronomically at Vostok.

Figure 4

Fig. 5.Antarctic ice sheet, showing elevation contours, isotherms of 10 m depth temperatures (mean annual), and measured temperature-depth profiles (from Robin, 1983). Line AB shows location of radio-echo profiling in Figure 4. Line DE shows the location of the profile in Figure 6.

Figure 5

Fig. 6.Calculated particle paths (arrows), isochrones (dashed lines, ages in 103 a), and temperature–depth profiles (full lines, temperatures in °C), assuming steady-state conditions along profile from Vostok to Wilkes Station (from Budd and others, 1971).

Figure 6

Fig. 7.a. Variation with time of the Vostok isotope temperature record in °C from δD values. The present mean surface temperature of -55.5 °C is shown as 0 °C on the scale. Temperatures are mean values over 100 years (thin lines) along with a smoothed curve (thick line).b. Variation with time of summer sea-surface temperatures from core RC11-120 in the sub-polar Indian Ocean (from Martinson and others, 1987).c. Variation with time of continental ice volume based on benthonic δ18O records (from Martinson and others. 1987). (Figure 7 is reproduced from Jouzel and others (1987) by permission of Nature.)

Figure 7

Fig. 8.Measured parameters on the Vostok ice core plotted against depth on the bottom scale and against time on the upper (non-linear) scale.a. Deuterium content (in ‰ w.r.t. SMOW). These data are interpreted as temperature in Figure 7a (from Jouzel and others, 1987).b. Carbon dioxide concentrations (ppm volume). Dots show the best estimates of CO2 and the envelope indicates the uncertainty (from Barnola and others, 1987).c. Aluminium concentration (ng g-1) (from De Angelis and others, 1987).d. Marine sodium concentration (ng g-1) (from De Angelis and others, 1987).