Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T03:31:46.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Synthetic biology with nanomaterials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 March 2018

Sanhita Ray
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, University of Calcutta, 35, Ballygunge Circular Road, Kolkata-700019, West Bengal, India
Ahana Mukherjee
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, University of Calcutta, 35, Ballygunge Circular Road, Kolkata-700019, West Bengal, India
Pritha Chatterjee
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of California at Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, USA
Kaushik Chakraborty
Affiliation:
Centre for Research in Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, JD 2, Sector III, Salt Lake, Kolkata-700 098, West Bengal, India
Anjan Kr Dasgupta*
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, University of Calcutta, 35, Ballygunge Circular Road, Kolkata-700019, West Bengal, India
*
Address all correspondence to Anjan Kr Dasgupta at adgcal@gmail.com; adbioc@caluniv.ac.in

Abstract

Magnetic field has been used to trigger biofilm formation. Iron oxide nanoparticles were attached to bacterial cells and cells were aggregated by application of magnetic field. Artificial cellular crowding triggered quorum sensing and led to the formation of biofilm at the sub-threshold population. Aggregation process was monitored by studying temporal dynamics of capacitance and conductance profiles. Capacitive profile exhibited a plateau upon introduction of magnetic field which was retained even after field was removed. This hysteresis property signified biofilm initiation in response to artificial crowding. This work demonstrates how synthetic biology is enabled by including nanoparticles in the interactome.

Information

Type
Research Letters
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 
Figure 0

Figure 1. (I) Setup for electrical monitoring of artificial aggregation. Schematic representation showing setup and direction of magnetic field with respect to the interdigitated electrode. (II) (a) Attachment of APTES-H + coated SPIONs to negatively charged bacterial surface. (b) Hydrodynamic radius and (c) Zeta potential of APTES-H + coated SPIONs (d) Zeta potential of control bacterial cell compared to that of SPION-coated bacterial cells.

Figure 1

Figure 2. (a) Light microscopic image of interdigitated electrode surface after immersion in bacteria–SPION suspension. In the suspension, same numbers of SPION-coated bacterial cells were added. The surface density of bacterial population significantly differs in the absence (a) and in the presence (b), of static magnetic field (0.45 T), to attract the SPION-conjugated bacteria. (c) Real-time capacitance change of SPION–bacteria with and without magnetic fields.

Figure 2

Figure 3. (I) Memory of the capacitive system for magnetic aggregation. Capacitance time-series was measured without magnet (1), in the presence of magnet (2), and immediately after removal of the magnet (3). Correlate these states (1, 2, and 3) with that in Fig. 1(b) (II). (a) Resistance time-series of bacteria–SPION suspension in the absence and presence of magnetic field and after removal of the magnetic field. (b) Normalized resistance values with respect to “no magnet” show that for successive sets the tendency to increase is flattened and ultimately reversed.

Figure 3

Figure 4. (a) SPION incorporated biofilm formation (M) in the ELISA plate bottom in response to application of magnetic field, C denotes control, i.e. where no magnetic field was present. (b) Acridine orange absorbance at 450 nm and (c) crystal violet absorbance, obtained with ELISA plate reader, for +magnet and no magnet. (d, e) Fluorescence microscopic images of Acridine-stained ELISA plate wells showing cell clumps in the absence of magnetic field and biofilm formation in the presence of magnetic field.

Supplementary material: PDF

Ray et al. supplementary material

Figures S1-S6

Download Ray et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 3.1 MB