Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T03:16:34.245Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Examining the interlayer interactions formed between reduced graphene oxide and ionic liquids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2013

Natis Shafiq
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75080-3021
Muge Acik
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75080-3021
Daniel R. Dreyer
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712
Juan Juarez
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75080-3021
Christopher W. Bielawski
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712
Yves J. Chabal*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75080-3021
*
Address all correspondence to Yves J. Chabal atchabal@utdallas.edu

Abstract

It is important to understand the electrolyte–electrode interactions for fabricating graphene oxide (GO)- and ionic liquid (IL)-based ultracapacitors. Therefore, we explored how the type and size of the cations in various ILs determine the nature of processed materials. In all cases, the ILs intercalate into the graphitic structure but marked differences are observed during exfoliation via thermal reduction. The combination of a long alkyl chain ammonium-based cation and a large-volume anion leads to strong interactions and defect formation, as evidenced by CO2 production during annealing. In contrast, using the same anions but different cations stabilize the GO functional groups below 400 °C.

Information

Type
Research Letters
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013
Figure 0

Figure 1. (a) Chemical structures of the ILs studied: IL-1 (N-methyl-N-octylpyrrolidinium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide), IL-2 (N-octyl-N,N,N-tributylammonium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide), IL-3 (1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide), IL-4 (N-octyl-N-methylpiperidinium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide) and (b) infrared transmission absorbance spectra of GO and GO–IL composites in 2:1 ratios (w/w) prepared in deionized water at room temperature: GO–IL-1, GO–IL-2, GO–IL-3, and GO–IL-4.

Figure 1

Figure 2. X-ray diffraction patterns (XRD) of GO–IL composites for (a) GO–IL-1, (b) GO–IL-2, (c) GO–IL-3, and (d) GO–IL-4 at room temperature, and after annealing at 150, 300, and 500 °C. Orange dashed line indicates XRD pattern of as-synthesized graphite oxide (GO) with a (002) orientation at 2θ = 11°, corresponding to an interlayer spacing of approximately 9 Å.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Infrared transmission differential spectra of GO–IL (2:1) composites of (a) GO–IL-1, (b) GO–IL-2, (c) GO–IL-3, and (d) GO–IL-4 annealed stepwise in the temperature range of 60–500 °C.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Infrared transmission absorbance spectra of GO-IL (2:1) composites of (a) GO–IL-1, (b) GO–IL-2, (c) GO–IL-3, and (d) GO–IL-4 annealed stepwise in a temperature regime of 60–500 °C.