Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-skzmx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T00:43:24.703Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Piezo-controlled microwave devices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Yuriy M. Poplavko*
Affiliation:
National Technical University of Ukraine, 37, Peremogi Avenue, 03056 Kiev, Ukraine.
Vitally I. Molchanov
Affiliation:
National Technical University of Ukraine, 37, Peremogi Avenue, 03056 Kiev, Ukraine.
Yuriy I. Yakimenko
Affiliation:
National Technical University of Ukraine, 37, Peremogi Avenue, 03056 Kiev, Ukraine.
*
Corresponding author: Y. M. Poplavko Email: poplavko@ieee.org
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

At present, millimeter wave fast tunable components are required for telecommunication systems, car collision prevention radar, etc. The only mechanical way of control inserts practically no loss in the frequency agile system. That is why micro-electromechanical systems devices are being studied intensively. In an overview, an alternative way – piezo-electromechanical tuning of microwave components – is reported.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2009
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Basic methods of microwave device tuning.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Screw tunable DR: 1, 2, – two parts of the DR separated by a controlling slot; 3 – screw to adjust resonant frequency; 4 – low-ɛ dielectric supports.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Piezo-tunable DR: 1, 2 – two parts of the DR separated by a driven slot Δ 3, 3′ – low-ɛ dielectric supports; 4 – piezoelectric cantilever fixed at the mount; 5, 6 – voltage supply; 7, 8 – coaxial input and output [3].

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Piezo-tunable CPW phase shifter [4, 5].

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Fast piezoelectric actuators: “moonie” type (left) and “cymbal” type (right) [6, 7].

Figure 5

Fig. 6. DR mechanical tuning at 10 GHz: (a) ordinary manner, (b) proposed manner, (c) characteristics comparison, (d) DR and amplitude–frequency characteristic (AEC) near f0 = 9.4 GHz [8].

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Tunable DR-based filters.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. CPW phase shifter. Substrate's ɛ1 = 10 corresponding to silicon or gallium arsenide that is used in MMIC. The tunable dielectric part has ɛ2 = 10, 20, and 40.

Figure 8

Fig. 9. Microstrip line piezo-controlled phase shifter simulation at 10 GHz: (a) known technique [2], (b) proposed way, and (c) characteristics comparison. Substrate thickness is 0.5 mm, ɛ = 10, strip width is 0.5 mm, dielectric plate thickness is 1 mm, ɛ = 10.

Figure 9

Fig. 10. Waveguide experiment with piezo-controlled phase shifter, matched at 8–12 GHz and filled by various low-loss ceramics: (a) used design, (b) effective dielectric constant versus gap size, and (c) specific (per 1 cm) phase shift depending on gap size andactuator voltage [9].

Figure 10

Fig. 11. Microstrip phase shifter with moveable ground electrode.

Figure 11

Fig. 12. Phase shift versus gap experimental dependence, substrate ɛ ~ 10 – 20.

Figure 12

Fig. 13. Scheme of piezo-controlled CPW phase shifter.

Figure 13

Fig. 14. Calculated phase shift per 1 cm and effective dielectric constant of the system in Fig. 13: 1 – with moveable dielectric; 2 – without moveable dielectric.

Figure 14

Fig. 15. Suspended microstrip line under piezo-moveable bridge.

Figure 15

Fig. 16. Calculated phase shift per 1 cm and effective dielectric constant of the system: 1 – as shown in Fig. 15; 2 – without etched canal; 3 – without moveable dielectric.

Figure 16

Fig. 17. Principle of substrate effective dielectric constant tuning: (a) – side view of moving ground electrode under the substrate and, (b) – calculated ɛeff – change in the case of ɛD = 10 for an alumina substrate thickness of 0.65 mm.

Figure 17

Fig. 18. Microstrip resonators: (a) – first mode of λ/2 in a stop band mode regime; resonator width is 1.6 mm, its length is 6.8 mm, gap is Δ = 40 µm, frequency change is Δf = 0.44 GHz and; (b) – tunable double-resonator filter characterization.