Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T23:05:52.672Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Echinoidea and Holothuroidea (Echinodermata) of the Trindade and Martin Vaz Archipelago, off Brazil, with new records and remarks on taxonomy and species composition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2016

Luciana Martins*
Affiliation:
Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de São Paulo, Caixa Postal 42494, São Paulo–SP, CEP: 04218–970, Brazil
Camilla Souto
Affiliation:
Department of Integrative Biology, Museum of Paleontology, University of California, Berkeley, 1101 Valley Life Science Building, Berkeley–CA 94720, USA
Joel Braga
Affiliation:
Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de São Paulo, Caixa Postal 42494, São Paulo–SP, CEP: 04218–970, Brazil
Marcos Tavares
Affiliation:
Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de São Paulo, Caixa Postal 42494, São Paulo–SP, CEP: 04218–970, Brazil
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: L. Martins, Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de São Paulo, Caixa Postal 42494, São Paulo–SP, CEP: 04218–970, Brazil. email: martinsrluciana@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The degree of isolation of oceanic islands makes these environments an excellent model for evolutionary studies. Proper knowledge of the species composition of oceanic islands, however, is required to better understand evolutionary processes (e.g. speciation events). A 3-year survey in the shallow waters (up to 30 m) of the Trindade and Martin Vaz oceanic insular complex, and a literature review on the data published for these islands and for Fernando de Noronha and São Pedro and São Paulo oceanic archipelagos have been conducted to document the biodiversity of echinoids and holothuroids from these isolated Brazilian oceanic islands. Sixteen species were collected and characterized morphologically, including two first records for the South Atlantic and one for Brazil. Comparison with conspecific specimens from the Brazilian coast and congeners was also done. Species richness increased from six to 18; the richness in Trindade Island being the highest among the South Atlantic oceanic islands. However, these islands remain undersampled beyond 30-m depth. Endemism was very low, suggesting the potential role of oceanic currents and seamounts as stepping-stones in transoceanic dispersal of species to remote islands. The Brazilian oceanic islands are impoverished oceanic outposts of the Brazilian Province; nevertheless, endemic species and intraspecific morphological variations compared with the mainland suggest they may also be regions of speciation. Documenting their biodiversity is critical for effective management and conservation of their marine ecosystems.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2016 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Eucidaris tribuloides (Lamarck, 1816): A–E, G–H (MZUSP 679); F (MZUSP 651). (A) Specimen from Trindade Island photographed in situ, at 14 m depth; (B) aboral view; (C) oral view; (D) ambulacrum; (E) interambulacrum; (F) detail of the apical disc; (G) Aristotle's lantern; (H) apophysis. Scale bars: B–E, 10 mm; F, 5 mm.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Eucidaris tribuloides (Lamarck, 1816): A–E, I–L, O (MZUSP 669); F–H (MZUSP 1028); M–N (MZUSP 679). SEM images – (A–B) valves of narrow fistulate globiferous pedicellariae, and (C) detail of the head; valve of broad fistulate globiferous pedicellariae from a specimen (D) from the BOI and (F) from Boipeba island (Brazilian coast); (E, G) detail of the pedicellariae head, respectively; (H) detail of the edge of the pedicellaria depicted in (F); (I) slender tridentate pedicellariae from a specimen from Boipeba island; (J) plate from peristomial membrane; (K–M) tube feet ossicles; and (N–O) detail of a spine. Scale bars: A–B, D, F, I, 150 µm; J, 400 µm; K–O, 50 µm.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Ratios of structures of Eucidaris specimens plotted against their test diameter. Upper graph: apical disc diameter/peristome diameter ratio; bottom graph: (Int) median interambulacral width/(Are) ambital areole diameter. Measurements taken from E. clavata from AST (data from Pawson (1978)); E. tribuloides from the Caribbean, West Africa (includes data from Pawson (1978), and North-east Brazil (Alagoas and Bahia states (NE BR)) (in white), and SPSP and TMV (in black); and E. galapagensis, E. metularia and E. thouarsii from the eastern Pacific (in grey).

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Diadema ascensionis Mortensen, 1909: A–C, E–F (MZUSP 599); D, I (MZUSP 603); G (MZUSP 600); H (MZUSP 643). (A) Specimen from Trindade Island photographed in situ, at 9.5 m depth; images of the carapace showing (B) aboral view, (C) ambulacrum, interambulacrum of a specimen (D) 39.2 mm long and (E) 50 mm long; detail of the (F) apical disc, (G) Aristotle's lantern, (H) buccal notches, and (I) auricle. Scale bars: B–E, 10 mm; F, 5 mm.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Diadema ascensionis Mortensen, 1909: A (MZUSP 603); B–E (MZUSP 1003); F, H–K (MZUSP 599); G (MZUSP 600); L–N (MZUSP 590). SEM images – (A) valve of triphyllous pedicellariae; (B–D) valves of narrow rostrate pedicellariae, and (E) detail of the head; (F) plate from peristomial membrane; tube feet ossicles are (G) crown, (H–I) perforated plate, and (J–K) ‘doubled-sided hair-comb’; (L–M) longitudinal view and (N) cross section of the distal portion of a spine. Scale bars: A–D, 100 µm; F, 500 µm; G–K, 100 µm; M, 500 µm.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Echinometra lucunter (Linnaeus, 1758): A–C, F (MZUSP 619); D–E, G–H (MZUSP 616); I (MZUSP 1290). (A) Specimen from Trindade Island photographed in situ, between 0–1 m depth; images of the carapace showing (B) aboral view, (C) oral view, (D) ambulacrum, and (E) interambulacrum; detail of the (F) apical disc, (G) Aristotle's lantern, and auricle of (H) specimen from the BOI, and (I) from the mainland. Scale bars: B–E, 10 mm; F, 5 mm.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Echinometra lucunter (Linnaeus, 1758): A, E–L (MZUSP 623); B–D (MZUSP 616). SEM images – (A) valve of triphyllous pedicellaria; (B–C) valves of fanged globiferous pedicellariae, and (D) detail of the head; (E–H) valves of ophicephalous pedicellariae; (I) plate from peristomial membrane; (J) crown from tube feet; and (K–L) detail of a spine. Scale bars: A, 50 µm; B, 200 µm; C, 150 µm; E–H, 100 µm; I, 200 µm; J–K, 100 µm.

Figure 7

Table 1. Morphological traits of the test used to distinguish the Echinometra species. Numbers in parentheses indicate rare amounts of pores.

Figure 8

Fig. 8. Pseudoboletia maculata Troschel, 1869: A (MZUSP 1027); B–H (MZUSP 1026). (A) Specimen fixed in ethanol; images of the carapace showing (B) aboral view, (C) oral view, (D) ambulacrum, and (E) interambulacrum; detail of the (F) apical disc, (G) Aristotle's lantern, and (H) auricle. Scale bars: B–E, 10 mm; F, 5 mm.

Figure 9

Fig. 9. Pseudoboletia maculata Troschel, 1869 (MZUSP 1027). SEM images – (A–B) valves of triphyllous pedicellariae; (C–D) valves of ophicephalous pedicellariae; (E–G) valves of fanged globiferous pedicellariae; (H) C-shaped ossicle; (I) rosette-like plate from peristomial membrane; (J) crown, (K) plate, and (L) C-shaped ossicle from tube feet ([M] detail of the tip of the C-shaped ossicles depicted in (L)), and (K–L) detail of a spine. Scale bars: A–B, 50 µm; C–D, 100 µm; E, 200 µm; F, 100 µm; G, 50 µm; H, 5 µm; I–K, 100 µm; L, 20 µm; O, 250 µm.

Figure 10

Fig. 10. Tripneustes ventricosus (Lamarck, 1816): A–F, H (MZUSP 632); G (MZUSP 633). (A) Specimen from Trindade Island photographed in situ, between 0–1 m depth; images of the carapace showing (B) aboral view, (C) oral view, (D) ambulacrum, and (E) interambulacrum; detail of the (F) apical disc, (G) Aristotle's lantern, and (H) auricle. Scale bars: B–E, 10 mm; F, 5 mm.

Figure 11

Fig. 11. Tripneustes ventricosus (Lamarck, 1816): A, H–I (MZUSP 1020); B–G, J–L (MZUSP 632). SEM images – (A) valve of triphyllous pedicellaria; (B–D) valves of ophicephalous pedicellariae; (E–F) valves of fanged globiferous pedicellariae; (G–H) valves of tridentate pedicellariae; (I) rosette-like plate from peristomial membrane; (J) crown from tube feet; and (K–L) detail of a spine. Scale bars: A, 100 µm; B–H, 200 µm; I–J, 150 µm, L, 100 µm.

Figure 12

Fig. 12. Leodia sexiesperforata (Leske, 1778) (MZUSP 1070). (A) Specimen from Trindade Island photographed in situ, between 16–17 m depth; images of the carapace showing (B) aboral view and (C) oral view; detail of the (D) apical disc, (E) peristome, and (F) periproct; Aristotle's lantern (G) oral and (H) aboral side, and (I–J) detail of individual pyramids. Scale bars: B–C, 20 mm; D–F, 2 mm; G–H, 5 mm; I–J, 1 mm.

Figure 13

Fig. 13. Leodia sexiesperforata (Leske, 1778) (MZUSP 1070). Optical microscope images of the (A–D) bidentate pedicellariae, of the spines from the (E) edge of the test, and from the (F) aboral region; and (G) SEM image of the tip of a spine depicted in (F). Scale bars: A–D, 10 µm; G, 100 µm.

Figure 14

Fig. 14. Plagiobrissus grandis (Gmelin, 1791): A (MZUSP 1084); B, G (MZUSP 1289); C–F (MZUSP 1117). (A) Specimen from Trindade Island photographed in situ, at 16 m depth; images of the carapace showing (B) aboral view, (C) oral view and (D) lateral view of the body; and detail of the (E) apical disc, (F) peristome and (G) periproct. Scale bars: B–D, 20 mm; E–G, 5 mm.

Figure 15

Fig. 15. Plagiobrissus grandis (Gmelin, 1791) (MZUSP 1289). SEM images – (A–B) valves of triphyllous pedicellariae; (C) valve of rostrate pedicellaria; (D–E) valves of tridentate pedicellariae; (F–G) valves of long globiferous pedicellariae; (H–I) rods from tube feet; and (K–L) detail of a spine. Scale bars: A–B, 30 µm; C–E, 50 µm; F–G, 100 µm; H–J, 20 µm; K, 200 µm.

Figure 16

Fig. 16. Chiridota rotifera (Pourtalès, 1851): A, C (MZUSP 944); B (MZUSP 946); D (MZUSP 973). Specimen fixed in ethanol: (A) lateral view of the body, (B) miliar granules (indicated by the arrow) on the posterior region of the body, (C) detail of the anterior region (arrow indicates warts (aggregations of wheel) in tentacles and body wall), and (D) detail of tentacles and calcareous ring (indicated by the arrow). Scale bars: A–B, 5 mm; D, 1 mm.

Figure 17

Fig. 17. Chiridota rotifera (Pourtalès, 1851): (MZUSP 944). SEM and optical microscope images of the ossicles – wheels from body wall in (A) ventral, (B) dorsal and (C) lateral view; (D) early developmental stage of a wheel; (E) C-shaped ossicles from body wall; (F–H) rods from tentacles. Scale bars: A–D, 20 µm; E, 10 µm; F–H, 50 µm.

Figure 18

Fig. 18. Euapta lappa (Müller, 1850) (MZUSP 289). (A) Specimen from Trindade Island photographed in situ, at 14 m depth, and (B) fixed in ethanol; (C) detail of pinnate tentacles; (D) calcareous ring, arrow indicates place for insertion of radial nerves. Scale bars: B, 5 cm; E, 2 mm.

Figure 19

Fig. 19. Euapta lappa (Müller, 1850) (MZUSP 289). SEM images of the ossicles – anchors from body wall in (A) dorsal and (B) ventral view, (C) detail of minute tubercles on anchor vertex, and (D) detail of branched anchor stock; anchor plates from body wall in (E–F) dorsal and (G–H) ventral view; detail of (I) dentate holes and of (J) anchor handle; (K) rods and (L) rosettes from tentacles. Scale bars: A–C, 100 µm; D, 20 µm; E–H, 100 µm; I–L, 20 µm.

Figure 20

Fig. 20. Actinopyga agassizii (Selenka, 1867) (MZUSP 293). (A) Specimen from Trindade Island photographed in situ, depth not recorded; (B) calcareous ring; (C) top view of mouth showing numerous tentacular ampullae (indicated by a yellow arrow in (D)) and a mottled brown Polian vesicle (indicated by a white arrow in (D)); and (E) detail of anal teeth. Scale bars: B, 5 mm; C, 1 mm; D, 5 mm; E, 3 cm.

Figure 21

Fig. 21. Actinopyga agassizii (Selenka, 1867) (MZUSP 293). SEM images of the ossicles – rosette-like elements from body wall: (A) ‘dog biscuit’-shaped and (B) branched rods; (C–D) rods from tentacles; and (E) end plate and (F) rod from tube feet. Scale bars: A–B, 20 µm; C–E, 100 µm; F, 20 µm.

Figure 22

Fig. 22. Holothuria (Cystipus) pseudofossor Deichmann, 1930 (MZUSP 1305). (A) Specimen fixed in ethanol, (B) photograph and (C) drawing of the calcareous ring (‘R’, radial plate, ‘I’, interradial plate). Scale bars: A, 1 cm; B, 2 mm.

Figure 23

Fig. 23. Holothuria (Cystipus) pseudofossor Deichmann, 1930 (MZUSP 1305). SEM images of the ossicles – tables from body wall in (A) bottom, (B) lateral and (C) top view; (D) button from body wall; tables from ventral region in (E) lateral and (F) top view; (G–H) large curved rods ((I) detail of the tip of the rod depicted in (H) showing tiny perforation), and (J) small straight rod from tentacles; (K) end plate and (L–M) rods from tube feet. Scale bars: A–C, 20 µm; D, 50 µm; E–F, 20 µm; G–H, 50 µm; J, 10 µm; K–M, 100 µm.

Figure 24

Fig. 24. Holothuria (Halodeima) grisea Selenka, 1867 (MZUSP 1057). (A) Specimen fixed in ethanol; detail of calcareous ring (B) before and (C) after bleach treatment. Scale bars: A, 6 cm; B–C, 5 mm.

Figure 25

Fig. 25. Holothuria (Halodeima) grisea Selenka, 1867 (MZUSP 1057). SEM images of the ossicles: body wall tables in (A) lateral, (B) top and (C) bottom view; (D–F) different developmental stages of body wall buttons; rods from (G–M) tentacles, and (N) the tube feet. Scale bars: A, 20 µm; B–C, 10 µm; D–F, 20 µm; G–N, 100 µm.

Figure 26

Fig. 26. Holothuria (Halodeima) manningi Pawson, 1978 (MZUSP 301). (A) Dorsal and (B) ventral view of specimen fixed in ethanol; (C) calcareous ring; (D); arrows indicate the Polian vesicles; and (E) detail of anal papillae. Scale bars: A–B, 10 cm; C–D, 2 cm; E, 1 cm.

Figure 27

Fig. 27. Holothuria (Halodeima) manningi Pawson, 1978 (MZUSP 301). SEM images of the ossicles – body wall tables in (A) lateral view and (B) detail of reduced disc; (C) buttons from body wall; (D–F) rods from tentacles; and (G–H) flattened plates and (I) end plate from tube feet. Scale bars: A–B, 20 µm; C, 10 µm; D–F, 20 µm; G–I, 50 µm.

Figure 28

Fig. 28. Holothuria (Semperothuria) surinamensis Ludwig, 1875 (MZUSP 1058). (A) Specimen fixed in ethanol; (B) peltate tentacles; (C) calcareous ring; (D) madreporite. Scale bars: A, 5 cm; C, 2 mm; D, 1 mm.

Figure 29

Fig. 29. Holothuria (Semperothuria) surinamensis Ludwig, 1875 (MZUSP 1058). SEM images of the ossicles – body wall tables in (A) lateral, (B) bottom, and (C) top view; (D–G) rods from tentacles; (H) plate, (I–J) rods, and (K) end plate from tube feet. Scale bars: A–C, 20 µm; D, 10 µm; E, 20 µm; F–G, 100 µm; H, 50 µm; I–K, 100 µm.

Figure 30

Fig. 30. Holothuria (Thymiosycia) arenicola Semper, 1868 (MZUSP 949). (A) Specimen from Trindade Island photographed in situ, at 10 m depth (the colour may have been affected by light gradients), and (B) fixed in ethanol; (C) peltate tentacles; (D) calcareous ring; (E) white arrow indicates tentacular ampullae attached to the calcareous ring (red arrow). Scale bars: B, 5 cm; C, 2 cm; D, 2 mm; E, 1 mm.

Figure 31

Fig. 31. Holothuria (Thymiosycia) arenicola Semper, 1868 (MZUSP 949). SEM images of the ossicles – tables from body wall in (A) top and (B) lateral view; (C) button from body wall; (D–F) rods from tentacles; (G–H) rods and (I) end plate from tube feet. Scale bars: A–C, 20 µm; D–H, 50 µm; I, 100 µm.

Figure 32

Fig. 32. Isostichopus badionotus (Selenka, 1867) (MZUSP 936). (A) Specimen from Trindade Island photographed in situ, at 11.5 m depth, and (B) fixed in ethanol; (C) calcareous ring; (D) tentacular ampullae indicated by arrow; and (E) detail of the madreporite. Scale bars: B, 5 cm; C–E, 5 mm.

Figure 33

Fig. 33. Isostichopus badionotus (Selenka, 1867) (MZUSP 936). SEM images of the ossicles – tables from body wall in (A) lateral and (B) top view; (C–E) rods from tentacles; (F–G) rods and (H) end plate from tube feet. Scale bars: A, 20 µm; B, 5 µm; C–D, 200 µm; E, 50 µm; F–G, 100 µm; H, 200 µm.

Figure 34

Table 2. Geographic distribution of echinozoan species so far known from the tropical southern Atlantic oceanic islands. Abbreviations and symbols as following: ASC, Ascension Island; BR, continental coast and shelf of Brazil, including Abrolhos Archipelago; FN, Fernando de Noronha Archipelago; MV, Martin Vaz Archipelago; NEA, North-east Atlantic (continental coast and shelf of West Africa, from Morocco to Equatorial Guinea, Canary Islands, Cape Verde Archipelago, São Tomé and Príncipe Island, and West European coast); NWA, North-west Atlantic (North Carolina to Florida and Texas, Gulf of Mexico, Caribbean Sea, Bahamas and Bermuda); SPP, São Pedro and São Paulo Archipelago; SEA, South-east Atlantic (continental coast and shelf of West Africa, from Gabon to South Africa); STH, Saint Helena Island; TI, Trindade Island; UA, continental coast and shelf of Uruguay and Argentina (including Falkland/Malvinas Islands). X, Previously known record; *, New record; ?, Record to be confirmed.