Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T04:11:08.070Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Maternal effect gene expression in porcine metaphase II oocytes and embryos in vitro: effect of epidermal growth factor, interleukin-1β and leukemia inhibitory factor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2016

Marta Wasielak*
Affiliation:
Department of Gamete and Embryo Biology, Institute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Tuwima 10, 10–747 Olsztyn, Poland. Department of Gamete and Embryo Biology, Institute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Tuwima 10, 10–748 Olsztyn, Poland.
Teresa Więsak
Affiliation:
Department of Gamete and Embryo Biology, Institute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Tuwima 10, 10–748 Olsztyn, Poland.
Iwona Bogacka
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Physiology, University of Warmia and Mazury, Oczapowskiego 1A, 10–719 Olsztyn, Poland.
Beenu Moza Jalali
Affiliation:
Department of Gamete and Embryo Biology, Institute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Tuwima 10, 10–748 Olsztyn, Poland.
Marek Bogacki
Affiliation:
Department of Gamete and Embryo Biology, Institute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Tuwima 10, 10–748 Olsztyn, Poland.
*
All correspondence to: M. Wasielak. Department of Gamete and Embryo Biology, Institute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Tuwima 10, 10–747 Olsztyn, Poland. Tel: +48 89 539 3114. Fax: +48 89 539 3155. E-mail: m.wasielak@pan.olsztyn.pl
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Maternal effect genes (MEG) play a crucial role in early embryogenesis. In vitro culture conditions may affect MEG expression in porcine oocytes and embryos. We investigated whether in vitro culture medium supplementation with epidermal growth factor (EGF), IL-1β or LIF (leukemia inhibitory factor) affects the mRNA level of ZAR-1 (zygote arrest 1), NPM2 (nucleoplasmin 2) and DPPA3 (developmental associated protein 3) in porcine MII oocytes and embryos. Cumulus–oocyte complexes (COCs) were matured in NCSU-37 medium (control) or in NCSU-37 with EGF 10 ng/ml, IL-1β 10 ng/ml or LIF 50 ng/ml. After maturation for 44–46 h, MII oocytes were preserved for the analysis of MEG mRNA levels (experiment 1). In experiment 2, COCs were fertilized, and the presumptive zygotes were cultured in the same groups. Then, 2-, 4-, 8-cell embryos, morulae and blastocysts were collected for the analysis of MEG mRNA levels. LIF addition to the maturation medium increased MII oocyte numbers (P < 0.05), while EGF and IL-1β did not affect oocyte maturation. Medium supplementation with EGF resulted in lower DPPA3 mRNA levels in MII oocytes and in 2- and 4-cell embryos versus control embryos (P < 0.05). LIF treatment increased DPPA3 mRNA levels in morulae and blastocysts (P < 0.05). Culture with EGF and IL-1β decreased ZAR-1 and NPM2 mRNA levels in 2-cell embryos (P < 0.05). The inclusion of EGF or IL-1β in the porcine in vitro production system influences ZAR-1, NPM2 and DPPA3 mRNA in MII oocytes and embryos but not beyond the 4-cell stage. LIF stimulates oocyte maturation and affects DPPA3 mRNA in porcine morulae and blastocysts in vitro.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 
Figure 0

Table 1 Primers used for real-time PCR

Figure 1

Figure 1 Porcine oocyte maturation and embryo development in vitro. The percentages of MII oocytes are expressed relative to the total number of oocytes subjected to in vitro maturation (A). The percentages of cleaved embryos on Day 2 and blastocysts on Day 7 of culture are expressed relative to the total number of presumptive zygotes used for in vitro culture (B). In total, five or six experiments were conducted for each treatment. Asterisk above the bars indicate statistically significant differences from the control group at P < 0.05.

Figure 2

Figure 2 ZAR-1, NPM2 and DPPA3 mRNA levels in porcine MII oocytes obtained in vitro in NCSU-37 medium supplemented with 10 ng/ml of EGF, 10 ng/ml of IL-1β and 50 ng/ml of LIF. The data were normalized to the luciferase mRNA level and are presented in arbitrary units as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). For each treatment four replicates were analyzed. Asterisks above the bars indicate statistically significant differences from the control group at P < 0.05.

Figure 3

Figure 3 ZAR-1 mRNA level in porcine embryos (2-, 4-, and 8-cell embryos, morulae and blastocysts) produced in vitro in NCSU-37 medium supplemented with 10 ng/ml of EGF, 10 ng/ml of IL-1β and 50 ng/ml of LIF. The data were normalized to luciferase mRNA level and are presented in arbitrary units as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). For each treatment four replicates per developmental stage were analyzed. Asterisks above the bars indicate statistically significant differences from the control group at P < 0.05.

Figure 4

Figure 4 NPM2 mRNA level in porcine embryos (2-, 4-, and 8-cell embryos, morulae and blastocysts) produced in vitro in NCSU-37 medium supplemented with 10 ng/ml of EGF, 10 ng/ml of IL-1β and 50 ng/ml of LIF. The data were normalized to luciferase mRNA expression and are presented in arbitrary units as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). For each treatment four replicates per developmental stage were analyzed. Asterisks above the bars indicate statistically significant differences from the control group at P < 0.05.

Figure 5

Figure 5 DPPA3 mRNA level in porcine embryos (2-, 4-, and 8-cell embryos, morulae and blastocysts) produced in vitro in NCSU-37 medium supplemented with 10 ng/ml of EGF, 10 ng/ml of IL-1β and 50 ng/ml of LIF. Data were normalized to luciferase mRNA level and are presented in arbitrary units as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). For each treatment four replicates per developmental stage were analyzed. Asterisks above the bars indicate statistically significant differences from the control group at P < 0.05.