Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T03:37:06.263Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

MgB2, a two-gap superconductor for practical applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2011

Marina Putti
Affiliation:
CNR-SPIN and Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Genova via Dodecaneso 33, 16146 Genova, Italy; e-mail putti@fisica.unige.it
Giovanni Grasso
Affiliation:
Columbus Superconductors SpA, Via delle Terre Rosse 30, 16133 Genova, Italy; grasso.gianni@clbs.it

Abstract

The history of superconductivity in MgB2 has been short, but intense. Ten years after its discovery, the two-gap mechanism of superconductivity in MgB2 has been mastered to a considerable extent while developing its superconducting properties in wires that meet the technical and economic requirements of industrial applications. The hope for dry superconductivity (i.e., without any liquid cryogen) using this simple and low-cost material has been recently fulfilled, with current commercial availability of MgB2-based dry MRI machines. We expect that scientific progress in understanding and developing MgB2 conductors will continue, strengthening the base for further deployment of MgB2 in applications. This article presents the main scientific and technical highlights of MgB2, describing its two-gap superconductivity, progress in improving its superconducting properties, the advances toward making MgB2 a fully recognized practical superconductor, and its prospects for ongoing and upcoming applications.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011
Figure 0

Figure 1. The electronic structure of MgB2. The thick lines represent σ and π bands, crossing the Fermi level (horizontal dashed line). The inset shows the hexagonal crystallographic structure. Image courtesy of S. Massidda.

Figure 1

Table I. Characteristic properties of the σ and π bands.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Superconducting critical temperature Tc of MgB2 as a function of the residual resistivity ρ0 of a collection of irradiated samples. Inset: the energy gaps Δσ (0) (empty symbols) and Δπ (0) (filled symbols) as a function of Tc (see Reference 10).

Figure 3

Figure 3. Critical current Jc as a function of magnetic field B at 4.2 K for a standard MgB2 tape, improved samples with different types of additions,17,20–25 and a nanostructured thin film.26 (See references given for details about the different samples.)

Figure 4

Figure 4. (a) Vortex-pinning force FP normalized to its maximum value FPmax versus the reduced field h = H/Hirr. The continuous line represents the theoretical expression for the normalized grain boundary pinning force. The experimental curves are measured in tapes produced by the ex situ powder-in-tube method and by varying the high-energy ball-milling time of the precursor powders. (b) FP/FPmax for neutron irradiated polycrystalline samples.

Figure 5

Figure 5. (a) Transverse cross-section of an ex situ MgB2 wire. (Image courtesy of Columbus Superconductor.) (b) Transverse cross-section of an in situ MgB2 wire. (Image courtesy of Hypertech Research.)

Figure 6

Figure 6. First commercial MgB2-based MRI system. (Image courtesy of ASG Superconductors.)

Figure 7

Figure 7. Induction heater MgB2 coil (indicated by the arrow) prior to insertion in its vacuum chamber for testing.