Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T10:19:59.954Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

High-resolution correlation of the Homerian carbon isotope excursion (Silurian) across the interior of the Midland Platform (Avalonia), UK

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2019

David C. Ray*
Affiliation:
School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston B15 2TT, United Kingdom
Emilia Jarochowska
Affiliation:
GeoZentrum Nordbayern, Fachgruppe Paläoumwelt, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Loewenichstr. 28, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
Philipp Röstel
Affiliation:
GeoZentrum Nordbayern, Fachgruppe Paläoumwelt, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Loewenichstr. 28, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
Graham Worton
Affiliation:
Dudley Museum and Art Gallery, The Archives and Local History Centre, Tipton Road, Dudley DY1 4SQ, United Kingdom
Axel Munnecke
Affiliation:
GeoZentrum Nordbayern, Fachgruppe Paläoumwelt, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Loewenichstr. 28, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
James R. Wheeley
Affiliation:
School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston B15 2TT, United Kingdom
Ian Boomer
Affiliation:
School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston B15 2TT, United Kingdom
*
Author for correspondence: David C. Ray, Email: daveray01@yahoo.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

New δ13Ccarb and microfacies data from Hereford–Worcestershire and the West Midlands allow for a detailed examination of variations in the Homerian carbon isotope excursion (Silurian) and depositional environment within the Much Wenlock Limestone Formation of the Midland Platform (Avalonia), UK. These comparisons have been aided by a detailed sequence-stratigraphic and bentonite correlation framework. Microfacies analysis has identified regional differences in relative sea-level change and indicates an overall shallowing of the carbonate platform interior from Hereford–Worcestershire to the West Midlands. Based upon the maximum δ13Ccarb values for the lower and upper peaks of the Homerian carbon isotope excursion (CIE), the shallower depositional setting of the West Midlands is associated with values that are 0.7 ‰ and 0.8 ‰ higher than in Hereford–Worcestershire. At the scale of parasequences the effect of depositional environment upon δ13Ccarb values can also be observed, with a conspicuous offset in the position of the trough in δ13Ccarb values between the peaks of the Homerian CIE. This offset can be accounted for by differences in relative sea-level change and carbonate production rates. While such differences complicate the use of CIEs as a means of high-resolution correlation, and caution against correlations based purely upon the isotopic signature, it is clear that a careful analysis of the depositional environment can account for such differences and thereby improve the use of carbon isotopic curves as a means of correlation.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Locality maps for the Midland Platform. (a) Areas attributed to the Midland Platform and Welsh Basin showing the broad location of the study area. (b) Outcrop of the Much Wenlock Limestone Formation across the northern and central part of the Midland Platform with study areas located. (c) The Storridge and Suckley (Hereford–Worcestershire) areas showing the location of measured sections at Whitman’s Hill Quarry (SO 7490 4830) and Bruff Business Park (SO 7365 5065); (d) The Dudley (West Midlands) area showing the location of measured sections at Castle Hill, Wren’s Nest Hill and Mons Hill: Castle Mill Basin (CMB) (SO 9454 9164), Reef Knoll Stairwell (RKS) (SO 9363 9202), Lower NCC Cutting (LNC) (SO 9380 9222), Seven Sisters Quarry North (SSQ) (SO 9358 9188), Upper NCC Cutting (UNC) (SO 9382 9222), Reef Knoll Quarry (RKQ) (SO 9356 9200 and SO 9358 9210), Snake Pit Quarry (SPQ) (SO 9383 9228) and Lion’s Mouth Cavern (LMC) (SO 9354 9161).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Stratigraphic overview of Whitman’s Hill Quarry and Bruff Business Park modified from Ray et al. (2013), showing the carbon isotopic values, the position of parasequences (PS), bentonite correlations (Marker Bentonite), lithostratigraphic units and transitional intervals (Passage Beds).

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Stratigraphic overview of the Dudley area modified from Ray et al. (2013), showing the position of the measured sections, carbon isotopic values, the position of parasequences (PS), marker bentonite beds (WNH), lithostratigraphic units and transitional intervals (Basement and Passage beds) (see Fig. 2 for the key). Within the study area are the following systems tracts and their bounding surfaces: SB/TS – sequence boundary and combined transgressive surface; ETST – early transgressive systems tract; SMSS – surface of maximum sediment starvation; LTST – late transgressive systems tract; MFS – maximum flooding surface; HST – highstand systems tract; SFR – surface of forced regression; FSST – falling stage systems tract.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. The carbon isotopic record across the Coalbrookdale – Much Wenlock Limestone Formation boundary at Dudley. (a) The Castle Mill Basin section (Wren’s Nest Tunnel Portal) and the carbon isotopic record. (b) Stratigraphic overview of Castle Mill Basin section.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. The carbon isotopic record across the Much Wenlock Limestone – Lower Elton Formation boundary at Dudley. (a) The Lion’s Mouth Cavern section and the carbon isotopic record. (b) Stratigraphic overview of the Lion’s Mouth Cavern section.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. A comparison between the composite carbon isotopic curves derived from the Hereford–Worcestershire (Storridge and Suckley) and the West Midlands (Dudley) areas (see Fig. 2 for the key).

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Microfacies of the uppermost part of the Coalbrookdale Formation (see Figs 2, 4 for thin-section (TS) locations). (a) Transition from crinoidal wacke- to grainstone; arrows point to Rhabdoporella, thin-section 2 (TS2), Castle Mill Basin, scale bar 1 mm. (b) Bryozoan encrusted with Allonema, thin-section 1 (TS1), Castle Mill Basin, scale bar 500 µm. (c) Calcareous green alga Dimorphosiphon?, thin-section 1 (TS1), Castle Mill Basin, scale bar 750 μm. (d) Crinoidal packstone with recrystallized shells encrusted with Rothpletzella, thin-section 2 (TS2), Castle Mill Basin, scale bar 100 μm. (e) Close-up of Allonema in (b), scale bar 200 µm. (f) Tentaculite, thin-section 2 (TS2), Castle Mill Basin, scale bar 1 mm. (g) Spherical unidentified components with thin recrystallized walls, thin-section 3 (TS3), Castle Mill Basin, scale bar 1 mm. (h) Brachiopod shell encrusted with Allonema, thin-section 4 (TS4), Whitman’s Hill, scale bar 500 μm. (i) Bioclastic pack- to floatstone over an erosional boundary cutting into a poorly fossiliferous mudstone, thin-section 4 (TS4), Whitman’s Hill, scale bar 3 mm. (j) Laminated peloidal grainstone with sparse bioturbations (arrows), thin-section 5 (TS5), Whitman’s Hill, scale bar 3 mm. (k) Close-up of the peloidal grainstone in (j), scale bar 200 μm.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Microfacies of the Lower Quarried Limestone (a–g) and Nodular Beds (h–j) members (see Fig. 2). (a) Oncoid–gastropod floatstone; arrows show algal coating on recrystallized gastropod shell, thin-section 7 (TS7), Whitman’s Hill, scale bar 2 mm. (b) Crinoidal pack- to grainstone with cortoids, thin-section 6 (TS6), Whitman’s Hill, scale bar 4 mm. (c) Oncoid formed by probable Girvanella, thin-section 7 (TS7), Whitman’s Hill, scale bar 500 μm. (d) Close-up of a porostromate problematicum forming an oncoid, thin-section 6 (TS6), Whitman’s Hill, scale bar 200 μm. (e) Truncated oncoid formed by a porostromate problematicum, thin-section 6 (TS6), Whitman’s Hill, scale bar 500 μm. (f) Aggregation of Girvanella and Allonema floating in the matrix, thin-section 8 (TS8), Whitman’s Hill, scale bar 500 μm. (g) Close-up of Girvanella in (f), scale bar 200 μm. (h) Girvanella floating in a grainstone, thin-section 9 (TS9), Whitman’s Hill, scale bar 500 μm. (i) Contact between crinoidal bioturbated wacke- to packstone and crinoidal grainstone with peloids, thin-section 11 (TS11), Bruff Business Park, scale bar 4 mm. (j) Sponge spicules in a wackestone matrix, thin-section 10 (TS10), Bruff Business Park, scale bar 500 μm.

Figure 8

Fig. 9. Microfacies of the Upper Quarried Limestone Member (a–c, e–f) and Lower Elton Formation (d) (see Figs 2, 5). (a) Partly dolomitized crinoidal packstone, sample 12 (TS12), Bruff Business Park, scale bar 3 mm. (b) Laminated peloidal grainstone with Planolites-like bioturbations, sample 14 (TS14), Bruff Business Park, scale bar 3 mm. (c) Erosional contact between bioturbated bioclastic wackestone and crinoidal grainstone, sample 13 (TS13), Bruff Business Park, scale bar 3 mm. (d) Erosional contact between bioturbated bioclastic float- to rudstone and crinoidal pack- to grainstone, sample 15 (TS15), Bruff Business Park, scale bar 3.5 mm. (e) Bioturbated crinoidal packstone with phosphatized crinoids, sample 16 (TS16), Lion’s Mouth Cavern, scale bar 2.5 mm. (f) Close-up of (e), scale bar 500 μm.

Supplementary material: PDF

Ray et al. supplementary material

Ray et al. supplementary material

Download Ray et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 454 KB