Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T23:38:36.437Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Intra-basaltic soil formation, sedimentary reworking and eodiagenetic K-enrichment in the Middle to Upper Ordovician Dunn Point Formation of eastern Canada: a rare window into early Palaeozoic surface and near-surface conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2011

P. JUTRAS*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Saint Mary's University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 3C3, Canada
J. J. HANLEY
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Saint Mary's University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 3C3, Canada
R. S. QUILLAN
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Saint Mary's University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 3C3, Canada
M. J. LEFORTE
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Saint Mary's University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 3C3, Canada
*
*Author for correspondence: pierre.jutras@smu.ca
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mafic flows of the Middle to Upper Ordovician Dunn Point Formation of eastern Canada were deeply weathered under warm and relatively humid conditions before being buried by subsequent flows. In the absence of superior plants, and in the context of relatively low atmospheric carbon levels, the soils developed alkaline groundwater conditions through mineral–water interactions, which resulted in an enhanced mobility of Al relative to Si in most palaeosols of that formation. Although the vegetation cover was volumetrically insignificant compared with that of subsequent geological times, it was apparently producing very efficient chelates, which, for most palaeosols of the succession, generated a well-defined cheluviation pattern for not only Al and Fe, but also and mainly Ti, which is typically immobile in modern soils. The resulting soils developed an Al–Fe–Ti-depleted upper horizon that was enriched in Si, probably through periodic ground saturation. Long-term climatic variations related to orbital cycles are inferred to have accounted for a second type of soil in the succession, which contrasts with the former by showing a Si-depleted and less Al–Fe–Ti-depleted upper horizon. Some soil material was substantially reworked by surface runoff, but such occurrences can be easily differentiated from in situ soil material in terms of texture, structure and composition. A thick overlying rhyolite flow is thought to be responsible for providing abundant K in solution, which was incorporated in the underlying basalt palaeosols as exchangeable cations within a probably montmorillonitic clay precursor to the Fe–Mg-rich phengite that later developed during deep burial and orogenic compression.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011
Figure 0

Figure 1. Simplified geology of the study area and section localities (modified from Boucot et al. 1974). The inset situates the study area within eastern Canada.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Stratigraphic table for the early to middle Palaeozoic of the Arisaig area in northern Nova Scotia (based on the time scale of Okulitch, 2004, and on the stratigraphic determinations of Boucot et al. 1974, Murphy, Keppie & Hynes, 1991 and Hamilton & Murphy, 2004).

Figure 2

Figure 3. (a) Well-developed red-silcrete-bearing profile from the McGillivray Brook locality (palaeosol 2); (b) non-silcrete-bearing profile from the Doctor's Brook locality (palaeosol 1); (c) weathering profile truncated and downcut by a surface runoff deposit at the Doctor's Brook locality (palaeosol 2); (d) gradational truncation of a calcite–epidote vein network by weathering at the Arisaig locality (palaeosol 2).

Figure 3

Table 1. X-ray diffraction (XRD) analyses. Semi-quantitative vol.% based on diffraction peak intensities in relation to a quartz standard

Figure 4

Table 2. X-ray fluorescence analyses. Detection limit is 0.1% for major elements and 1 ppm for minor elements

Figure 5

Figure 4. Vertical mass gains and losses in the Middle to Upper Ordovician Dunn Point Formation palaeosols and alluvium with respect to their basaltic host rocks; based on the dimensionless element-mass-transfer coefficients of Anderson, Dietrich & Brimhall (2002; modified from Brimhall et al. 1992) in relation to Zr.

Figure 6

Figure 5. SEM maps showing the distribution of silicon in Arisaig palaeosol 2: (a) sample A2e (Amq horizon); (b) sample A2c (Bo horizon); (c) sample A2a (host rock).

Figure 7

Figure 6. SEM maps showing the distribution of aluminium in Arisaig palaeosol 2: (a) sample A2e (Amq horizon); (b) sample A2c (Bo horizon); (c) sample A2a (host rock).

Figure 8

Figure 7. SEM maps showing the distribution of potassium in Arisaig palaeosol 2: (a) sample A2e (Amq horizon); (b) sample A2c (Bo horizon); (c) sample A2a (host rock).

Figure 9

Figure 8. SEM maps showing the distribution of calcium in Arisaig palaeosol 2: (a) sample A2e (Amq horizon); (b) sample A2c (Bo horizon); (c) sample A2a (host rock).

Figure 10

Figure 9. SEM maps showing the distribution of iron in Arisaig palaeosol 2: (a) sample A2e (Amq horizon); (b) sample A2c (Bo horizon); (c) sample A2a (host rock).

Figure 11

Figure 10. SEM maps showing the distribution of titanium in Arisaig palaeosol 2: (a) sample A2e (Amq horizon); (b) sample A2c (Bo horizon); (c) sample A2a (host rock).

Figure 12

Figure 11. Mineralogical maps of Arisaig palaeosol 2: (a) sample A2e (Amq horizon); (b) sample A2c (Bo horizon); (c) sample A2a (host rock); based on EDS element maps, XRD data (Table 1) and optical microscopy.

Figure 13

Figure 12. Surface runoff deposit above Doctor's Brook palaeosol 2 in thin-section, with polarized light; (a) sandy upper part (sample DB2g), with a coarse sand-size lithic clast of weathered basalt in the lower left quadrant and a well-preserved orthoclase clast in the lower right; (b) silty lower part of the deposit (sample DB2h).

Figure 14

Figure 13. Pedogenic model: (a) establishment of a high water table following the emplacement of a mafic flow; (b) ground saturation during peak rain season, resulting in the mobilization of various cations in solution throughout the profile; (c) gradual lowering of the aquifer to its phreatic level during the drier season, and establishment of a vertical gradient of groundwater pH owing to vertical differences in weathering and evaporation rates; (d) establishment of well-developed horizons after several decades; (e) subsequent mafic flow emplacement and bulldozing of the mechanically weak uppermost part of the palaeosol above the zone of induration by silica accumulation.