Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T03:21:07.672Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“Geochronology and geochemistry of pelitic granulite from the South Delhi Terrane of the Aravalli Delhi Mobile Belt, NW India: implications for petrogenesis and geodynamic model”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 July 2023

M. Kumar
Affiliation:
Centre of Advanced Study in Geology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, India
D. Prakash*
Affiliation:
Centre of Advanced Study in Geology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, India
C. K. Singh
Affiliation:
Centre of Advanced Study in Geology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, India
S. Singh
Affiliation:
Centre of Advanced Study in Geology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, India
R. K. Pandey
Affiliation:
Centre of Advanced Study in Geology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, India
Pradip K. Singh
Affiliation:
Centre of Advanced Study in Geology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, India
B. Mahanta
Affiliation:
Centre of Advanced Study in Geology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, India
*
Corresponding author: D. Prakash; Email: dprakash_ynu@yahoo.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An attempt has been made to illustrate the evolution of pelitic granulite from south of the Balaram-Abu road, which lies in the South Delhi Terrane (SDT) of the Aravalli-Delhi Mobile Belt (ADMB), using geochemistry and geochronology. The current work offers a plausible explanation for the protolith of pelitic granulite, nature of the sediments and its provenance. The elemental geochemistry of the pelitic granulites reveals that the protolith is an arkosic to shaley type. The rare earth elements pattern shows that there is a negative Eu anomaly and a small excess of LREE over HREE. This means that the source of sediments probably has the same elements as the upper crust. However, the amounts of Sr, Nd and Pb vary a lot, which shows that the sediments supplied from two different types of sources (felsic and mafic) in different proportions from a Proterozoic terrain. The monazite geochronology indicates that the metamorphic overprint occurred between 797 Ma and 906 Ma. Additionally, the ages correlate to the debris that was formed between the 1188 Ma and 1324 Ma from magmatic/sedimentary sources for pelitic granulite. The present research provides a more in-depth understanding of the evolutionary history of the pelitic granulite that comprises the SDT in the ADMB region during the Proterozoic era.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. (a) Map of India showing different tectonic elements, modifed after Prakash et al. (2021). (b) Geological map of the Aravalli Mobile Belt (modified after Prakash et al.2021). (c) Geological map of the study area showing sample location (map modified after Srikarni et. al, 2004; Singh et al.2010; Prakash et al.2021; Biswal et al.2022).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Field photographs of the principal rock types in the study area: (a) Study area shows well exposures of pelitic granulites near the village of Dhabeli. (b) Typical pelitic granulites with banding of colours. (c) Tight isoclinal fold is developed in response to severe compressional regeim near Chikanavos village. (d) Field photograph illustrating the evolution of a quartz vein near kanpura. (e) Pelitic granulites having alternating bands of luecocritic and melanocritic in near khapa village. (f) High concentration of garnet crystallization in the core of folding in the vicinity of Khapa village. (g) Core of sheath fold surrounded by folded migmatitic bands in pelitic granulites near Dhanpura village. (h) Joints with no obserable movement of blocks are also developed in pelitic granulites near Diwani hills.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Photomicrographs of pelitic granulites. (a) Sillimanite occurs as inclusions within garnet. (b and c) Symplectitic intergrowth of spinel and cordierite. (d) Biotite quartz symplectites replaces garnet.

Figure 3

Table 1a. Representative microprobe analyses and structural formulae of garnet and orthopyroxene

Figure 4

Figure 4. (a) Triangular plot of garnet showing Fe-rich composition. (b) Triangular plot of spinel showing Fe-rich composition. (c) Triangular plot of biotite showing relatively high Fe + Mn and Al content as compared to Mg content. (d) Triangular plot of feldspar showing higher concentration of sanidine and oligoclase composition.

Figure 5

Table 1b. Representative microprobe analyses and structural formulae of spinel, biotite and cordierite

Figure 6

Table 1c. Representative microprobe analyses and structural formulae of K-feldspar, sillimanite and ilmenite

Figure 7

Table 2a. Chemical composition of pelitic granulite. Major oxides (%) and rare earth elements (PPM)

Figure 8

Figure 5. Harker variation graphs, showing the relation of Al2O3, Fe2O3, K2O, TiO2, MgO, MnO, Na2O and CaO with increase of SiO2.

Figure 9

Table 2b. Chemical composition of pelitic granulite. Major elements (%) and trace elements (PPM)

Figure 10

Table 3. Comparison of geochemical values of the pelitic granulite of study area

Figure 11

Figure 6. (a) Chondrite-normalized rare earth elements (REE) patterns in the pelitic granulites samples and (b) primitive mantle normalize trace elements spider diagram.

Figure 12

Figure 7. The composition of the protolith in the study area is depicted Rb/Ba vs Rb/Sr diagram, showing the source of sediments are deficient in clay.

Figure 13

Table 4. Comparison of geochemical values of the pelitic granulite of the study area with rocks of different ages (McLennan et al.1980, Taylorand McLennan, 1985)

Figure 14

Figure 8. Differentiating the plate tectonic setting based on (a) Th, Hf and Co plotting and (b) La-Th-Sc to demonstrate the passive continental margin.

Figure 15

Table 5. Comparison of geochemical values of the pelitic granulite of the study area with rocks of different tectonic settings (Bhatia, 1983; Bhatia, 1985; Bhatia & Crook, 1986)

Figure 16

Figure 9. Represents the backscattered images (BSE-SEM) of different monazite grains.

Figure 17

Table 6. Analytical results from monazites of granulite using the EPMA U–Th–total Pb method

Figure 18

Figure 10. Displays the results of the ISOPLOT programme (Ludwig, 2011). (a) Weighted average older age distribution, (b) weighted average younger age distribution and (c) probability density plot.

Figure 19

Figure 11. Cartoon depicting different stages of evolution of the Aravalli-Delhi Fold Belts (ADMB) of the northwestern Indian Shield (after Rao et al.2000).