Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T03:12:32.168Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Impact of mid- to late Holocene precipitation changes on vegetation across lowland tropical South America: a paleo-data synthesis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2017

Richard J. Smith*
Affiliation:
University of Reading, Centre for Past Climate Change and Department of Geography and Environmental Science, School of Archaeology, Geography and Environmental Science (SAGES), Whiteknights, PO Box 227, Reading RG6 6AB, United Kingdom
Francis E. Mayle
Affiliation:
University of Reading, Centre for Past Climate Change and Department of Geography and Environmental Science, School of Archaeology, Geography and Environmental Science (SAGES), Whiteknights, PO Box 227, Reading RG6 6AB, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author at: University of Reading, Centre for Past Climate Change and Department of Geography and Environmental Science, School of Archaeology, Geography and Environmental Science (SAGES), Whiteknights, PO Box 227, Reading RG6 6AB, United Kingdom. E-mail address: r.smith3@pgr.reading.ac.uk (R. Smith).
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A multi-proxy paleo-data synthesis of 110 sites is presented, exploring the impact of mid- to late Holocene precipitation changes upon vegetation across Southern Hemisphere tropical South America. We show that the most significant vegetation changes occurred in southwest Amazonia and southeast Brazil, regions reliant on precipitation derived from the South American summer monsoon (SASM). A drier mid-Holocene in these regions, linked to a weaker SASM, favored more open vegetation (savannah/grasslands) than present, while increased late-Holocene precipitation drove expansion of humid forests (e.g., evergreen tropical forest in southwest Amazonia, Araucaria forests in southeast Brazil). The tropical forests of central, western and eastern Amazonia remained largely intact throughout this 6000-year period. Northeastern Brazil’s climate is “antiphased” with the rest of tropical South America, but a lack of paleo-data limits our understanding of how vegetation responded to a wetter (drier) mid-(late) Holocene. From this paleo-data perspective, we conclude that ecotonal forests already close to their climatic thresholds are most vulnerable to predicted future drought, but the forest biome in the core of Amazonia is likely to be more resilient. Of greater concern are widespread deforestation and uncontrolled anthropogenic burning, which will decrease ecosystem resilience, making them more vulnerable than they might be without current anthropogenic pressures.

Information

Type
Tribute to Daniel Livingstone and Paul Colinvaux
Copyright
Copyright © University of Washington. Published by Cambridge University Press, 2017 
Figure 0

Figure 1 (color online) Observed long-term mean precipitation (mm/day), 850 mb wind speed and wind direction for (a) June, July, and August (JJA), and (b) December, January, and February (DJF). Labels indicate key climate features: Intertropical Convergence Zone, ITCZ; South American Low Level Jet, SALLJ; Chaco Low, CL; South Atlantic Convergence Zone, SACZ; South Atlantic Subtropical High, SASH; and Nordeste Low, NL. See text for details. Precipitation data taken from Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission v7 (TRMM) 3B43 dataset (1998–2014; Huffman et al., 2007). Wind data taken from NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) dataset (1979–2010; Saha et al., 2010a, 2010b).

Figure 1

Figure 2 Overview maps of study area. (a) Location and numeric ID of each site corresponding to Table 1. (b) Broad modern vegetation biomes, modified from Olson et al. (2001). (c) Long-term average annual precipitation based on Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission v7 (TRMM) 3B43 dataset (1998–2014; Huffman et al., 2007). The polygons shown in (b) and (c) represent the regions discussed in text: CW, Central and western lowland Amazonia; EA, Eastern Amazonia; SW, Southwestern Amazonia; SB, Southeastern Brazil; NE, Northeastern Brazil. The blue squares in (b) and (c) show locations of the paleoclimate sites discussed in text: 1=El Condor, 2=Cueva del Tigre Perdido, 3=Lake Junin, 4=Huaguapo, 5=Lake Titicaca, 6=Laguna La Gaiba, 7=Botuvera Cave, 8=Rio Grande do Norte, 9=Paraíso Cave. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Figure 2

Table 1 List of paleoecological sites. “ID” number refers to location number in Figure 2a. Size categories refer to those outlined in Table 3. Superscript numbers next to site names refer to the proxy types used in that study: 1=pollen analysis; 2=charcoal analysis; 3=isotopic analysis; 4=physio-chemical analysis. Asterisk next to site ID indicates a site where an independent age-depth model was created (see Methods).

Figure 3

Table 2 Description of the broad vegetation classifications used in this study

Figure 4

Table 3 Size categories representing the different catchment areas of the paleoecological sites.

Figure 5

Figure 3 (color online) Selected paleoclimate records representing proxy records for precipitation changes through the last 6 ka, shown alongside calculated January insolation at 15°S (Berger and Loutre, 1991; Berger, 1992). (a) δ18O of stalagmite Core A and Core B from El Condor Cave (Cheng et al., 2013). (b) δ18O of stalagmite records NC-A and NC-B from Cueva del Tigre Perdido (van Breukelen et al., 2008). (c) δ18O of calcite from Lake Junin (Seltzer et al., 2000). (d) δ18O of speleothem record Huaguapo (Kanner et al., 2013). (e) Lake-level changes as measured by δ13C at Lake Titicaca (Rowe et al., 2002). (f) Pediastrum-inferred lake-level change at Laguna La Gaiba (Whitney and Mayle, 2012). (g) δ18O of speleothem record BTV3a, Sr/Ca of speleothem BTV21a from Botuvera Cave (BTV) site (Wang et al., 2007; Bernal et al., 2016). (h) δ18O of speleothem records FN1, RN1, and RN4 from the Rio Grande do Norte (RGDN) record (Cruz et al., 2009).

Figure 6

Figure 4 (color online) Paleoecological reconstructions at 0.5 ka time slices from 6 ka to present. Background of modern vegetation biomes, modified from Olson et al. (2001). Vegetation classifications outlined in Table 2. Size of circles represents catchment area of that site, outlined in Table 3.

Supplementary material: File

Smith and Mayle supplementary material 1

Smith and Mayle supplementary material

Download Smith and Mayle supplementary material 1(File)
File 986.3 KB