Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T08:03:34.167Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Direct numerical simulation of a supercritical hydrothermal flame in a turbulent jet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2021

Tai Jin
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, PR China School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, PR China
Changcheng Song
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, PR China
Haiou Wang
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, PR China
Zhengwei Gao
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, PR China
Kun Luo
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, PR China
Jianren Fan*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, PR China
*
†Email address for correspondence: fanjr@zju.edu.cn

Abstract

The aim of this study is to establish a fundamental understanding of the flame structure and autoignition characteristics of supercritical hydrothermal flames in three-dimensional shear-driven turbulence. The study involves direct numerical simulation of a non-premixed flame (with fuel comprising a mixture of 10 % $\textrm {H}_2$ and 90 % $\textrm {H}_2\textrm {O}$ in terms of mole fraction) at 25.0 MPa in a slot jet; detailed reaction mechanism and multispecies real-fluid properties are considered in the simulation. Qualitative transient inspection revealed that the flame undergoes a three-stage development process in the streamwise direction: sparse autoignition kernels in the upstream region, intense ignitions and establishment of a continuous flame surface in the middle region, and massive flamelets in the downstream region. Ignition kernels primarily form in the interior of large-scale shear-driven vortices featuring a low scalar dissipation rate. Probability density function (p.d.f.) analysis further confirmed that these kernels mainly form in the premixed combustion mode and on the fuel-lean side, in contrast to the authors’ previous findings concerning autoignition in a two-dimensional mixing layer. Analysis of the preignition chemistry indicator (i.e. $\textrm {H}_2\textrm {O}_{2}$ radicals) revealed that although the fuel-rich condition has a shorter homogeneous autoignition delay time, it does not exhibit any remarkable preignition chemistry or intense heat release in the upstream or middle regions because of its large-scale flow structure. A volume rendering of the dimensionless Damköhler number ($Da$) reveals the distribution of autoignition spots and propagating flames. The joint p.d.f. of the mixture fraction and $Da$ reveals the transition from sparse ignition to intense ignition and, finally, to flame propagation.

Information

Type
JFM Papers
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Elemental reaction models for hydrogen combustion in supcrcritical water, $k=A T^n \exp (-E/RT)$. Units of kJ, mol, cm$^3$, s, K (Holgate & Tester 1993). M$^{\dagger}$ is a third body, assumed to be exclusively $\textrm {H}_2\textrm {O}$.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Sketch of the 3-D DNS computational domain, with domain length $L_x=16.0\ \textrm {mm}$, height $L_y=11.0\ \textrm {mm}$ and width $L_z=2.0\ \textrm {mm}$. The height of the fuel inlet is $H=1.0\ \textrm {mm}$.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Transient inspection of the flame structure and combustion mode: (a) snapshots of $\chi$ on the $z=0$ plane at two representative instants; (b) snapshots of $\text {FI} \times \text {HRR}$ on the $z=0$ plane at two representative instants; (c) volume rendering of $\text {FI} \times \log _{10}\text {HRR}$ at two representative instants. The exhibited region is $3\ \textrm {mm}< x<6\ \textrm {mm}, 0\ \textrm {mm}< y<2\ \textrm {mm}$ and $-1\ \textrm {mm}< z<1\ \textrm {mm}$. The upper halves of panel (a,b) were captured at the same instant, and the bottom halves of panel (a,b) were both captured at another instant. The left side of panel (c) was captured at the same instant as the upper panel of (b), and the right side was captured 0.9 ms later. Volume rendering was performed using VisIt (Childs et al.2012).

Figure 3

Figure 3. Snapshots of key variables on the $z=0$ plane captured at the same instance as the upper panel of figure 2. The exhibited region is $0\ \textrm {mm}< x<5\ \textrm {mm}, 0\ \textrm {mm}< y<2\ \textrm {mm}$: (a) contour of $Y_{H_2}$; (b) contour of $Y_{O_2}$; (c) contour of $T$; (d) quiver plot of $\boldsymbol {V}$.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Snapshots of $T$ on the $z=0$ plane captured at the same time as those displayed in the upper halves of figure 2(a,b). The exhibited region is $3\ \textrm {mm}< x<8\ \textrm {mm}, 0\ \textrm {mm}< y<3\ \textrm {mm}$. The dashed black lines represent the isolines of $T=1200\ \textrm {K}$.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Statistical analysis of the mixing degree at various streamwise locations: (a) profiles of the p.d.f.s of $\xi$; (b) profiles of the $\xi$-conditional Favre-averaged HRR; (c) contour of the Reynolds average and r.m.s. of $\xi$ in physical space. The same colour bar is used for the contours of the Reynolds r.m.s. and Reynolds average of $\xi$.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Joint p.d.f. of $\xi$ and the combined field variable $\text {FI} \times \log _{10}\text {HRR}$ at various streamwise locations. The vertical black dashed line in each panel marks $\xi _{st}=0.911$. The univariate p.d.f.s of the two variables were also estimated and drawn on the marginal axes. For convenience of reference, a transient contour of $\text {FI} \times \text {HRR}$ is also presented.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Profiles of the $\xi$-conditional Favre average and variance of $T$ at various streamwise locations.

Figure 8

Figure 8. Contour of the mass fraction and mass production rate of $\textrm {H}_2\textrm {O}_{2}$ radicals ($Y_{H_2O2}$ and $\dot {\omega }_{H_2O_2}$, respectively). The contour of $\dot {\omega }_{H_2O_2}$ is flipped vertically to combine with the contour of $Y_{H_2O_2}$ for the convenience of integrated analysis.

Figure 9

Figure 9. Joint p.d.f. of $\xi$ and $\dot {\omega }_{H_2O_2}$ at various streamwise locations. The vertical black dashed line in each panel marks $\xi _{st}=0.911$. Estimates of the univariate p.d.f. of the two variables are also displayed on the marginal axes.

Figure 10

Figure 10. Profiles of the $\xi$-conditional Favre average and variance of $Y_{OH}$ at various streamwise locations.

Figure 11

Figure 11. Joint p.d.f. of $\xi$ and $\chi$ at various streamwise locations. The profile of $\langle \chi |\xi \rangle$ against $\xi$ is also plotted in the corresponding panels. The vertical black dashed line in each panel marks $\xi _{st}=0.911$. Estimates of the univariate p.d.f. of the two variables are also displayed on the marginal axes.

Figure 12

Figure 12. Volume rendering of $Da$ with regions of $Da \approx 1$ and $Da > 8$ highlighted.

Figure 13

Figure 13. Joint p.d.f. of $\xi$ and $\log _{10} Da$ at various streamwise locations. The vertical black dashed line in each panel marks $\xi _{st}=0.911$. The horizontal red dashed line in each panel marks $\log _{10} Da = 0$ ($Da=1$). Estimates of the univariate p.d.f. of the two variables are also displayed on the marginal axes.