Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T05:11:48.322Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of protein sources on concentrations of hydrogen sulphide in the rumen headspace gas of dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2012

A. J. M. Fonseca
Affiliation:
REQUIMTE, ICBAS, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salazar, Universidade do Porto, Campus Agrário de Vairão, Rua Padre Armando Quintas, 4485-661 Vairão VC, Portugal
A. R. J. Cabrita
Affiliation:
REQUIMTE, Departamento de Geociências, Ambiente e Ordenamento do Território, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, Campus Agrário de Vairão, Rua Padre Armando Quintas, 4485-661 Vairão VC, Portugal
L. A. O. Pinho
Affiliation:
REQUIMTE, ICBAS, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salazar, Universidade do Porto, Campus Agrário de Vairão, Rua Padre Armando Quintas, 4485-661 Vairão VC, Portugal
E. J. Kim
Affiliation:
Institute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Gogerddan, Aberystwyth SY23 3EB, United Kingdom
R. J. Dewhurst*
Affiliation:
Teagasc, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Grange, Dunsany, County Meath, Ireland

Abstract

Two Latin square design experiments investigated the relationship between hydrogen sulphide concentration in the rumen headspace gas of dairy cows and the early stages of protein degradation in the rumen. In Expt 1, three protein sources differing in rumen N (nitrogen) degradability (maize gluten feed (MGF); sunflower meal (SFM); and soyabean meal (SBM)) were used, whereas in Expt 2 four different batches of the same feed (MGF) differing in colour (CIE L*, a*, b* (CIELAB) scale) were used. After allowing the concentration of hydrogen sulphide in rumen gas to decline close to zero, a fixed amount of protein sources was offered to cows and the concentrations of hydrogen sulphide were recorded in rumen headspace gas at 30-min intervals. In Expt 1, the concentration of hydrogen sulphide showed considerable variation between protein sources, with MGF having the highest concentration followed by SFM and SBM resulting in very low concentrations. The N wash losses (zero time measurements with nylon bags) ranked the feeds in the same way, from MGF (highest; 61%) to SBM (lowest; 26%). There were marked differences in the degradation of cystine and methionine between protein sources, although the degradation of cystine was always higher than for methionine. MGF (Expt 2) led to increased concentrations of hydrogen sulphide, with peak concentrations achieved between 1 and 2 h after feeding. The concentrations of hydrogen sulphide were higher for MGF1, intermediate for MGF2 and lower for MGF3 and MGF4, agreeing with colour scale. Differences in the early stages of dietary sulphur degradation corresponded with differences in hydrogen sulphide concentrations in rumen gas. The results suggest that hydrogen sulphide concentrations in the rumen headspace gas could be useful to evaluate nutritional parameters not measured by the in sacco technique, contributing to a better understanding of the response of dairy cows to different protein supplements.

Information

Type
Nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2012
Figure 0

Table 1 Chemical composition of the feeds offered to cows before measurements (MS, RH, CON) and the protein sources (MGF, SFM, SBM) tested in Expt 1

Figure 1

Table 2 Chemical composition of the feeds offered to cows before measurements (G, GS, CON) and the chemical composition and colour parameters (CIELAB scale) for the four batches of MGF tested in Expt 2

Figure 2

Table 3 Mean effects of protein source (MGF, SFM, SBM) on rumen degradability of DM, N, cystine and methionine, and on concentration of hydrogen sulphide (ppm) in rumen headspace gas (Expt 1)

Figure 3

Figure 1 Effects of the intake of 0.75 kg dry matter of maize gluten feed (MGF), sunflower meal (SFM) and soyabean meal (SBM) on the concentration of hydrogen sulphide in the rumen headspace gas of dairy cows (Expt 1). Values represent the mean from three animals. s.e.m. = 18.9.

Figure 4

Figure 2 Dry matter (a), nitrogen (b), cystine (c) and methionine (d) degradability of maize gluten feed (MGF), sunflower meal (SFM) and soyabean meal (SBM; Expt 1). In Figures 2a and b, values represent the mean from three animals (s.e.m. = 1.34 and 1.73, respectively). In Figures 2c and d, values represent the mean from two animals (s.e.m. = 5.03 and 4.12, respectively).

Figure 5

Table 4 Mean effects of MGF batch on rumen degradability of DM and S, and on the concentration of hydrogen sulphide (ppm) in rumen headspace gas (Expt. 2).

Figure 6

Figure 3 Effects of the intake of 1.0 kg dry matter of four batches of maize gluten feed (MGF) on the concentration of hydrogen sulphide in the rumen headspace gas of dairy cows (Expt 2). Values represent the mean from four animals. s.e.m. = 70.6.

Figure 7

Figure 4 Dry matter (DM; a) and sulphur (b) degradability of four batches of maize gluten feed (MGF; Expt 2). Values represent the mean from two animals. (s.e.m. = 0.81 and 4.90, respectively).