Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-th4rj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T19:35:33.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of confinement on the brittle compressive fracture of ice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

E. M. Schulson
Affiliation:
Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, U.S.A.
D. E. Jones
Affiliation:
Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, U.S.A.
G. A. Kuehn
Affiliation:
Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Granular, fresh-water ice was deformed at −40°C at 10−3 s−1 under confinement. Loading was applied such that confining stress, σ2 and σ3, were equal to each other and proportional to the highest stress, σ1; i.e. σ2 = σ3 = Rσ1 . Two regimes were evident. At lower confinement, the fracture stress, σ1f, increases markedly as R increases. At higher confinement, σ1f increases less sharply. The transition occurs at about R = 0.15. Wing cracks were seen in the ice fractured within the low-R regime. The data are analyzed in terms of the frictional crack sliding-wing crack mechanism of brittle compressive fracture.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1991
Figure 0

Fig. 1.Load versus time curves for R=0,075.

Figure 1

Fig. 2.Brittle compressive strength versus confining ratio, R. The. broken curveis a plot of Equation (7).

Figure 2

Fig. 3.Thin sections from a fractured specimen which failed via splitting (R = 0.025) showing a wing crack (magnification = 2.5 ×); (a) non-polarized image, (b) cross-polarized image. Note that the inclined crack nucleated along a grain boundary, whereas the wings propagated transgranularly.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Thin section from a fractured specimen showing a granulated, shear band (R = 0.15, magnification= 2.5 ×): (a) non-polarized image, (b) cross-polarized image. Note, the offset along the fault at A and Β in (b).

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Schematic sketch of the frictional crack sliding-wing crack mechanism: (a) low stress: no cracks, (b) intermediate stress: inclined crack, (c) high stress: wings initiated and lengthened.