Sleep is currently a topic of great interest in the wider media, occupying many column inches in newspapers, a best-selling book^{Reference Walker1} and time on broadcast media. Sleep hygiene is rightly seen as being neglected in our technology driven society. Otorhinolaryngology has much to offer in encouraging the wider understanding of this important subject for physical and mental wellbeing, especially in relation to the common condition of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS). The review and meta-analysis by Sharma et al.^{Reference Sharma, Wormald, Fishman, Andrews and Kotecha2} confirms the widely held belief that nasal surgery has a role in the management of sleep apnoea and has the potential to increase quality of life even when the sleep apnoea related indices have not improved to a significant degree. However, the matter is far from being a simple one, as OSAS is often multi-level,^{Reference Phua, Yeo, Su and Mok3} and medical management, which includes continuous positive airway pressure, is important. Not every patient with OSAS and a nasal airway imperfection will necessarily benefit from surgery, and much more work is needed to determine which subgroups are the most likely to benefit. This should inform our patient counselling.

Management of patients who suffer from patulous Eustachian tube syndrome is rarely easy. This issue of the journal contains an article by Alli et al.^{Reference Alli, Shukla, Cook and Waddell4} that describes a decently sized series (often hard to accumulate in this condition), using a method in which computed tomography guidance is used to place a silicone (polydimethylsiloxane) elastomer suspension implant into the Eustachian cushion region. This follows on from a previous case report^{Reference Rodrigues, Waddell and Cook5} using the method, and complements a series from Oxford on silicone injection.^{Reference Mackeith and Bottrill6} Previous Journal of Laryngology & Otology articles and abstracts on this fascinating and difficult topic have addressed: the diagnostic problems and dilemma of determining abnormal blockage versus abnormal patency, and the real potential to make things worse,^{Reference Alper7} as well as simple symptomatic treatments such as paper patching.^{Reference Boedts8}

Tuning forks have a hallowed place in clinical examination of the ear and have been the topic of Journal of Laryngology & Otology articles since the late nineteenth century.^{Reference Grant9,Reference Browning, Swan and Chew10} However, even the most ardent supporters have to concede that there are many occasions where no such item is ready to hand. The study in this issue from Cardiff^{Reference Hopkins and Owens11} uses a smartphone application that enables the device to produce an equivalent vibration. In this preliminary study, a smartphone is shown to be an adequate substitute for a tuning fork, at least for the Weber test. As smartphones are almost universally ‘at hand’ for all clinicians, this could be a promising way of continuing the tradition of bedside assessment without a long wait while someone looks for a tuning fork, often in vain.