Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rngvg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T06:43:31.156Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of different approaches applied for surgical correction of partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2025

Fan Fan
Affiliation:
Pediatric Cardiac Center, Beijing Children’s Hospital & Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
Song Bai*
Affiliation:
Pediatric Cardiac Center, Beijing Children’s Hospital & Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
Xiaofeng Li
Affiliation:
Pediatric Cardiac Center, Beijing Children’s Hospital & Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
Zhiqiang Li
Affiliation:
Pediatric Cardiac Center, Beijing Children’s Hospital & Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
Feng Tong
Affiliation:
Pediatric Cardiac Center, Beijing Children’s Hospital & Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
Jian Guo
Affiliation:
Pediatric Cardiac Center, Beijing Children’s Hospital & Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
Nan Ding
Affiliation:
Pediatric Cardiac Center, Beijing Children’s Hospital & Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
Zhangke Guo
Affiliation:
Pediatric Cardiac Center, Beijing Children’s Hospital & Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
*
Corresponding author: Song Bai; Email: xzwkbs@126.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

Right anterolateral thoracotomy or left anterolateral thoracotomy applied to partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection correction have been reported to obtain cosmetic and less invasive outcomes as alternative approaches to median sternotomy. However, the application of different approaches is still confusing. We compared the perioperative and mid-term outcomes to seek indications of different approaches and guide surgical treatment of partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection.

Methods:

From July 2019 to August 2023, 44 patients who underwent surgical correction of partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection were recruited. Of these, 13 (29.6%) patients who underwent median sternotomy were separated into M group, 28 (63.6%) patients who underwent right anterolateral thoracotomy were separated into R group, and three (6.8%) patients who underwent left anterolateral thoracotomy were separated into L group. Clinical data were reviewed and compared between each group.

Results:

In M group, direct anastomosis accounted for the most (7, 53.8%), in R group, intra-atrial rerouting accounted for the most (22, 78.6%), and in L group, direct anastomosis accounted for the most (3, 100%). R group had shorter cardiopulmonary bypass time (70.0 ± 32.4 vs113.1 ± 83.3, p = 0.029), shorter ICU stay (1.0 ± 0.2 vs 1.9 ± 1.7, p = 0.01), shorter postoperative stay (6.0 ± 1.2 vs 8.3 ± 5.0, p = 0.021), and fewer chest tube drainage (8.4 ± 4.3 vs 13.9 ± 10.2, p = 0.026) compared with M group. Three left-sided partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection in L group adopted off-pump approach.

Conclusions:

Median sternotomy S.V.C. can be applicable to all anatomic types of partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection especially for complex types. Considering the minimally invasive advantages, we prefer applying right anterolateral thoracotomy for pulmonary vein connected to right atrium or proximal end of off-pump. Applying left anterolateral thoracotomy for left-sided partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection without atrial septal defect by off-pump.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Flow of patients in our study.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Anatomic types and surgical methods of PAPVC in different group. (a) Proportion of anatomic types. (b) Proportion of surgical methods. PAPVC = partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection; PV = pulmonary vein; SVC = superior vena cava.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Preoperative and follow-up echocardiographic characteristics. (a) Proportion of different degrees of right atrial enlargement. (b) Proportion of different degrees of tricuspid regurgitation.

Figure 3

Figure 4. CT reconstruction of chest wall and heart. (a) Coronal structure of chest and heart. (b) Sagittal structure of chest and heart. The green area represent the third intercostal space.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Left anterolateral thoracotomy applied for PAPVC correction. (a) The incision of left anterolateral thoracotomy (LALT) at preoperation. (b) The incision of LALT at postoperation. (c) Operative field exposure.

Figure 5

Table 1. Perioperative data of different surgical approaches

Figure 6

Table 2. Echocardiographic characteristics