1. Introduction
During the Mesozoic and Cenozoic, the high Arctic (Fig. 1) underwent multiple stages of rifting, sedimentation and magmatism in connection with the opening of the Atlantic and Arctic oceans. Cretaceous magmatic activity is considered to have been one of the main stages in this evolution and to have resulted in the High Arctic Large Igneous Province, termed HALIP (Maher, Reference Maher2001; Buchan & Ernst, Reference Buchan, Ernst, Hanski, Mertanen, Rämö and Vuollo2006; Minakov et al. Reference Minakov, Mjelde, Faleide, Flueh, Dannowski and Keers2012), extending from the Canadian Arctic Archipelago to Franz Josef Land. The mafic extrusive and intrusive rocks found in the Barents Sea define the Barents Sea Large Igneous Province (BLIP), and are an important component of the HALIP. The duration of this magmatic event and its influence on the tectonic evolution of the region remain uncertain however (e.g. Alvey et al. Reference Alvey, Gaina, Kusznir and Torsvik2008). Ernst & Bleeker (Reference Ernst and Bleeker2010) suggested that HALIP was emplaced during two phases at 130 and 90 Ma, coinciding with the opening of the Arctic Ocean. Much younger activity between 70 and 60 Ma is known to have built the Kap Washington volcanic succession at the northern edge of Greenland (Thorarinsson et al. Reference Thorarinsson, Holm, Tappe, Heaman and Tegner2011) while magmatism at 55 Ma (Charles et al. Reference Charles, Condon, Harding, Pälike, Marshall, Cui, Kump and Croudace2011) signals the break-up of the North Atlantic and Arctic Oceans.
Bathymetric map showing the position of Svalbard and Franz Josef Land at the edge of the Barents Sea platform and in relation to the other basins of the Arctic realm. Abbreviations: FZ – fault zone; GR – Gakkel Ridge; MJR – Morris Jesup Rise; NSI – New Siberian Islands; YP – Yermak Plateau.
On Franz Josef Land, basalts related to the HALIP are intercalated with fossiliferous sedimentary strata assigned from the Hauterivian to the Albian (c. 136–100 Ma) (Amundsen et al. Reference Amundsen, Evdokimov, Dibner, Andresen, Solheim, Musatov and Heintz1998) but such basalts also yield K–Ar dates that vary greatly, the majority of them from 175 to 92 Ma but with a peak at about 123 Ma (Piskarev et al. Reference Piskarev, Heunemann, Makar'ev, Makar'eva, Bachtadse and Aleksyutin2009). Radiometric K–Ar determinations for mafic sills (Tarakhovsky et al. Reference Tarakhovsky, Fishman, Shkola and Andreichev1983; Dibner, Reference Dibner1998) provided a range of ages from the Permian (288 ± 20 Ma) to the Oligocene (34 ± 2 Ma) although more recent K–Ar studies of 14 samples from the wells and 8 from outcrops indicate a much shorter period of activity with ages of 131–108 Ma, averaging 116 ± 5 Ma (Grachev et al. Reference Grachev, Arakelyantz, Lebedev, Musatov and Stolbov2001); the short timespan is comparable to that of the Siberian traps where magmatic activity did not last more than 2–3 Ma (Grachev, Reference Grachev2000).
The broad distribution of K–Ar and Ar–Ar dates from Svalbard and Franz Josef Land allows the interpretation that the magmatic evolution in the Arctic could have been a protracted series of events. For example, the compilation of Maher (Reference Maher2001) could be interpreted as indicating almost 150 Ma of oscillating, but essentially uninterrupted magmatic activity (see also Levskii et al. Reference Levskii, Stolbov, Bogomolov, Vasil'eva and Makar'eva2006; Nejbert et al. Reference Nejbert, Krajewski, Dubinska and Pecskay2011). Age variations observed between samples of common units (Nejbert et al. Reference Nejbert, Krajewski, Dubinska and Pecskay2011) suggest, however, that some of the dates record secondary resetting processes. Obtaining a reliable record for the timing of magmatism within this province is crucial for correlating the variety of magmatic expressions in the Arctic, for understanding the processes that caused their formation and for verifying whether their emplacement can be linked to some extreme climatic upheavals registered in the sedimentary record. Use of the more robust U–Pb method can help to consolidate the chronological record; in this paper we therefore report isotope dilution thermal ionization mass spectrometry (ID-TIMS) U–Pb ages for chemically abraded zircon from (1) a Cretaceous felsic tuff in Svalbard; (2) zircon, rutile and titanite from two mafic sills in Svalbard; and (3) zircon and baddeleyite from four drill cores intersecting mafic sills in Franz Josef Land. The felsic tuff occurs in the Helvetiafjellet Formation below the anoxic level, which is characterized by a negative δ 13C excursion at the boundary between Barremian and Aptian. The sample therefore provides the means to date the volcanic event and constrain the age of the Barremian–Aptian boundary.
2. Geological setting
The archipelagos of Svalbard and Franz Josef Land are situated on continental crust close to the northern edge of the Barents Sea platform (Fig. 1; Faleide et al. Reference Faleide, Tsikalas, Breivik, Mjelde, Ritzmann, Engen, Wilson and Eldholm2008). The crust underneath Svalbard comprises largely Precambrian rocks reworked during the Caledonian orogeny and is locally overlain by post-orogenic Devonian sedimentary deposits (Harland et al. Reference Harland, Lester, Anderson and Manasrah1997).
The post-Devonian evolution started with Permo-Carboniferous rifting and the development of discrete NE-trending troughs, mainly in the Barents Sea, followed by formation of an extensive post-rift carbonate platform with local accumulations of evaporitic sequences (Worsley, Reference Worsley2008). The Triassic is characterized by a decrease in subsidence, while the Jurassic–Cretaceous transition was dominated by the deposition of fine clastic sedimentary rocks. The Early Cretaceous was characterized by crustal uplift in the north, apparently related to the arrival of a mantle plume which was later responsible for HALIP volcanism. This regional doming resulted in deltaic progradation over the base Cretaceous unconformity. The northern uplift continued into the Aptian–Albian and through the Late Cretaceous (Worsely, Reference Worsley2008). These events preceded the Cenozoic break-up of Laurasia, which resulted in the opening of the Norwegian–Greenland Sea and the Eurasia Basin. These domains were linked across a SE-trending megashear system which involved both transtensional and transpressional components, the latter reflected in the development of the Spitsbergen Fold-and-Thrust Belt (Faleide et al. Reference Faleide, Tsikalas, Breivik, Mjelde, Ritzmann, Engen, Wilson and Eldholm2008). The regional variations resulted in variable stratigraphic developments between Svalbard and Franz Josef Land, the latter exhibiting both a much thicker Triassic sequence (4200 v. 1000 m) and much more abundant Cretaceous mafic sills and flows (Solheim et al. Reference Solheim, Musatov, Heintz, Elverhøi, Solheim, Musatov and Heintz1998).
The basaltic lava on Kong Karls Land and Franz Josef Land was preferentially extruded in synclines correlated to the Helvetiafjellet Formation, providing stratigraphic evidence of Early Cretaceous volcanic activity in the region. A geochemical study of basalts from Franz Josef Land shows that they are tholeiitic, and have positive ɛNd values (+6 to +4) indicative of a provenance from depleted mantle, but with more elevated Sr initial values suggestive of seawater contamination (Amundsen et al. Reference Amundsen, Evdokimov, Dibner, Andresen, Solheim, Musatov and Heintz1998). The mafic sill complexes were emplaced preferentially in organic-rich sedimentary sequences, such as the Jurassic Agardhfjellet Formation and in the Triassic and Permian (Grogan et al. Reference Grogan, Nyberg, Fotland, Myklebust, Dahlgren and Riis2000).
3. Samples
The Svalbard samples were collected during a sampling campaign in April 2010 along a transect from Isfjorden Radio to Agardhbukta. All samples were taken from the coarser portions of thick (30–50 m) mafic sills. Sample 1AX represents the Diabasodden sill intruding Triassic strata at Diabasodden, and the other (sample 7A) occurs in Palaeozoic strata in an upturned section at Festingen, Linnévatnet (Fig. 2). The latter sample is highly altered with plagioclase entirely saussuritized, whereas pyroxene is for the most part still well preserved. Long skeletal ilmenite is only locally altered. The alteration assemblage comprises biotite, iddingsite, chlorite, sericite, chlorite, calcite and epidote, in addition to a green amphibole forming locally from pyroxene. Rutile appears to be associated with the breakdown of pyroxene, but the association of titanite within this secondary assemblage is uncertain.
(a) Geological map of the region around Isfjorden, western Svalbard. (b) Inset with a cross-section illustrating the stratigraphic and tectonic relationships and showing the sample locations.
A third sample is a felsic tuff intersected by the DH3 borehole near Longyearbyen, drilled to test the site as a potential repository for CO2. The core was sampled at the University Centre of Svalbard, Longyearbyen. In the boreholes the Barremian – early Aptian Helvetiafjellet Formation is overlain by early Aptian sapropel-rich shales of the Carolinefjellet Formation.
A suite of samples was also obtained from drill cores in Franz Josef Land. In 1976–1981 three deep stratigraphic wells were drilled on the islands of Alexandra (Nagurskaya well), Graham Bell (Severnaya well) and Heyes (Heyes well) (Fig. 3). All three wells penetrate 3–87 m thick basaltic sheets, most of them sills but several dykes were also met in the Nagurskaya well. The thick sills intrude Late Triassic (Carnian) sequences (Dypvik et al. Reference Dypvik, Fjellså, Pcelina, Sokolov, Råheim, Solheim, Musatov and Heintz1998; Piskarev et al. Reference Piskarev, Heunemann, Makar'ev, Makar'eva, Bachtadse and Aleksyutin2009). Three of the samples (1893, 1895, 1902) represent gabbro-doleritic domains at the bottom of the 87 m thick sill in the Severnaya well. In addition we also processed a sample from a sill or basalt layer on Hooker Island (FJL 03/07), but could not find datable magmatic accessories. Similarly, an attempt to separate zircon and/or baddeleyite from a sill drilled by the Ludlow well in the Eastern Barents Sea was not successful.
Map of Franz Josef Land with sampled drill hole sites. The sections on the right side of the figure illustrate the stratigraphic context of the samples from Severnaya and Hooker Island. The section of the Nagurskaya well is characterized by many sills only a few metres thick and is not shown.
4. U–Pb geochronology
4.a. Analytical procedure
The samples from Svalbard were crushed and processed through a combination of Wilfley table, heavy liquid separation and magnetic separation; only two of eight mafic sill samples yielded zircon. We also obtained mineral separates from several mafic sills from the Severnaya, Nagurskaya and Hooker Island boreholes on Franz Josef Land. After selection under a binocular microscope, the zircons were chemically abraded (Mattinson, Reference Mattinson2010), a technique that involves annealing for three days at 900 °C followed by partial dissolution in HF for one night at c. 190 °C. Baddeleyite, rutile and titanite were not abraded. Zircon, baddeleyite and rutile were dissolved in bombs at c. 190 °C and titanite in Savillex vials on a hotplate, all of them after addition of a 202Pb–205Pb–235U spike. The rest of the procedure, based on Krogh (Reference Krogh1973), is as described in Corfu (Reference Corfu2004). The data have been corrected for 230Th disequilibrium following Schärer (Reference Schärer1984), assuming a Th/U ratio in the magma of 4. The correction increases the 206Pb/238U age by about 0.1 Ma for the samples with the lowest Th/U, but is next to irrelevant for some of the zircons with high Th/U. Blank correction was ≤2 pg Pb and 0.1 pg U. However, a higher blank likely affected some of the baddeleyite analyses due to the difficulty in transferring the very tiny blades into the dissolution vessel. For most zircon analyses, all common Pb can be attributed to blank and the occasional excesses were corrected using the model of Stacey & Kramers (Reference Stacey and Kramers1975). Common Pb in rutile and titanite was corrected using the composition of coexisting pyroxene (Table 1). Decay constants are those of Jaffey et al. (Reference Jaffey, Flynn, Glendenin, Bentley and Essling1971). Plotting and calculations were performed with the program Isoplot of Ludwig (Reference Ludwig2009). All the age uncertainties represent 2σ and were calculated by propagating all sources of analytical error, but do not include spike or decay constant uncertainties.
U–Pb data
aZ – zircon; B – baddeleyite; R – rutile; T – titanite; eu – euhedral; an – anhedral; lp – long prismatic (l/w = >4); sp – short prismatic; bl – thin blades; fr – fragments, broken prisms; tu – turbid; NA – not abraded; CA – chemical abrasion with overnight partial dissolution; CAr – chemical abrasion with only 2 hours partial dissolution; [1] number of grains in fractions
bTh/U model ratio inferred from 208/206 ratio and age of sample
cTotal amount of common Pb (initial + blank)
dRaw data corrected for fractionation
eCorrected for fractionation, spike, blank and initial common Pb; error calculated by propagating the main sources of uncertainty; initial common Pb corrected using Stacey & Kramers (Reference Stacey and Kramers1975) model compositions except for rutile and titanite in sample 7A that were corrected using the composition of co-existing pyroxene (6/4 = 18.821 ± 0.24% and 7/4 = 15.662 ± 0.28%); 206Pb/238U and 207Pb/206Pb values corrected for excess 206Pb assuming Th/U = 4 for the parent magma and using the equation of Schärer (Reference Schärer1984).
4.b. Sample 1AX: Diabasodden sill, Svalbard
The sample yielded a very coherent set of zircon crystals having the classical appearance of zircon in rapidly crystallized mafic magmas, that is, long euhedral prisms with prominent {100} and {101} crystal faces, almost ubiquitous longitudinal cavities either with melt or empty, and generally rusty. The analysed grains show high U contents and high Th/U and yield four overlapping analyses, which define a weighted mean 206Pb/238U age of 124.5 ± 0.2 Ma (Fig. 4a; Table 1).
(a–d) Concordia diagrams showing U–Pb data for zircon, baddeleyite, titanite and rutile from mafic sills and bentonite from Svalbard and Franz Josef Land. Ellipses indicate the 2σ uncertainty.
4.c. Sample 7A: Linnévatnet sill, Svalbard
The zircon population in this sample was of the same general morphological type as in sample 1AX, but with fewer and less well-preserved crystals. The analyses are spread along the concordia curve (Fig. 4b), suggesting that some of the grains likely contained xenocrystic components. The three youngest zircon data points yield a weighted mean 206Pb/238U age of 124.7 ± 0.3 Ma. Rutile occurs as orange-red crystals, translucent and in most cases altered. The two analyses indicate U contents of about 10 ppm and yield data that overlap the youngest zircon data, indicating formation in late stages of essentially the same process. Titanite forms clear euhedral to anhedral crystals containing the same amount of U but more Th than the rutile. The two analyses yield an age of 123.9 ± 0.3 Ma, younger than zircon and rutile and likely reflecting post-magmatic alteration processes.
4.d. Sample DH3-CO2: bentonite in Helvetiafjellet Formation
Zircon in the bentonite occurs as a reasonably homogeneous population consisting principally of small, equant to short-prismatic crystals with a predominance of {100} and {101} crystal faces. The analyses yield a spread of ages, however, with two data points overlapping at about 140 Ma, another four in the range 130–126 Ma and a group of six overlapping and giving a weighted mean 206Pb/238U age of 123.3 ± 0.2 Ma (Fig. 4c). This coherent group is interpreted to indicate the time of the volcanic event, whereas the older apparent dates likely reflect xenocrystic components either as cores or as entirely xenocrystic crystals formed during earlier magmatic phases.
4.e. Mafic sill, Severnaya borehole, Franz Josef Land
4.e.1. Sample 1893
Recovered zircon grains are mostly subrounded, frosted and heterogeneous, and likely of detrital origin. As the sample integrated a 5 m section at the bottom of the sill (Fig. 3), the presence of detrital zircon probably reflects an imperfect separation of the mafic sill part of the core from the surrounding sediment. Two of the most euhedral ‘magmatic-looking’ zircons were dated, but these gave Cambrian and Mesoproterozoic ages (Table S1, Fig. S1 see online Supplementary Material available at http://journals.cambridge.org/geo). Analyses were therefore performed on baddeleyite, which occurs as 20–50 μm long, very thin blades. Three of the analyses overlap giving a weighted mean 206Pb/238U age of 121.5 ± 0.3 Ma. The fourth analysis is slightly younger (Fig. 4d).
Because of the small tabular nature of the baddeleyite crystals it was not possible to subject them to air abrasion (Krogh, Reference Krogh1982); the age must therefore be considered a minimum age. One effect that can be significant in such small tabular crystals is the loss of daughter nuclides due to alpha recoil. Davis & Davis (Reference Davis and Davis2010) observed that some loss is detectable in the outer 50 nm of baddeleyite crystals and the effect causes a reduction of the 206Pb/238U ratio by 20–30% at 20 nm. If we assume that our baddeleyites are c. 5 μm thick, then about 2% of their volume would have been affected by alpha recoil loss. This translates into a reduction of the Pb/U ratio by c. 0.25%, corresponding to c. 0.4 Ma. The other potential effect, which is more difficult to quantify, is superimposed Pb loss by diffusion or alteration. For example, unabraded 55 Ma baddeleyite from mafic sills in the North Atlantic shows a reduction in the Pb/U ratio of 1–2% with respect to coexisting zircon processed using abrasion (Svensen et al. Reference Svensen, Planke and Corfu2010), whereas large baddeleyite from Karoo sills that was abraded gives the same age as zircon (Svensen et al. Reference Svensen, Corfu, Polteau, Hammer and Planke2012). If we assume that baddeleyite in our sample 1893 lost 1–2% by both alpha recoil and Pb diffusion, then its real age would have to be 1–2 Ma older, that is 122.5–123.5 Ma.
4.e.2. Samples 1895 and 1902
Some zircon grains with features typical of zircon in mafic rocks, i.e. resembling those described for sample 1AX, were recovered from samples 1895 and 1902 representing specific parts at the bottom of the Severnaya sill. Most of these grains were very metamict however, and first selections almost totally dissolved during the standard overnight partial dissolution procedure of the chemical abrasion process. Another batch of grains was subsequently only held in HF for a few hours in an attempt to preserve at least parts of the grains, but this short procedure did not manage to remove all the discordance and most of these analyses give too-young ages (Fig. 4d, e). The oldest analyses obtained from each sample give identical 206Pb/238U ages of 122.9 ± 0.5 and 122.5 ± 0.5 Ma, which combine into a weighted mean 206Pb/238U age of 122.7 ± 0.3 Ma. This age is consistent with the inference from the baddeleyite analyses and is considered a good estimate for the time of emplacement of the sill.
4.f. Sample 2944: mafic sill, Nagurskaya boreholes, Franz Josef Land
A few magmatic zircon crystals resembling those described above were also found in a sill from Nagurskaya. One of the analyses is discordant, but the second overlaps the oldest analyses from the Severnaya sill, giving a 206Pb/238U age of 122.2 ± 1.1 Ma (Fig. 4e). Their similarity suggests that the sills in Franz Josef Land are indeed 123–122 Ma.
4.g. Xenocrystic zircon in samples from mafic sills, Severnaya, Nagurskaya and Hooker Island boreholes, Franz Josef Land
Two of the samples discussed above (2944 and 1902) also contained older xenocrystic zircons giving ages of 308 Ma (2 grains) and c. 316 Ma (one grain, moderately discordant; Table S1, Fig. S1, online Supplementary Material available at http://journals.cambridge.org/geo). A grain with a similar but more discordant age was also found in sample 1852. Zircon in five other samples have Precambrian ages ranging from 3100 to 750 Ma, some concordant and some highly discordant (Fig. S1). Sharply euhedral prisms from a sample from Hooker Island yield instead a Triassic, two Permian and a Carboniferous age. The provenance of these grains is not understood.
5. Discussion
5.a. Timing of magmatism in Svalbard and Franz Josef Land
The new results confirm the stratigraphic evidence for a predominant Early Cretaceous (Barremian) age of mafic magmatism in Svalbard with overlapping ages of 124.5 ± 0.2 and 124.7 ± 0.3 Ma for the two large sills in Svalbard and a 1.5 Ma younger age for the felsic tuff in the Helvetiafjellet Formation. The sills on Franz Josef Land are somewhat younger as indicated by the age of the Severnaya sill at 122.7 ± 0.3 Ma and the single result of 122.2 ±1.1 Ma for a sill on Nagurskaya Island. Taken together, the new U–Pb ages show that these episodes of magmatic activity lasted for at least a few million years, which is consistent with the presence of multiple extrusive horizons in the Cretaceous stratigraphic record.
The new U–Pb ages, together with the confined stratigraphic interval of the lava flows, suggest that the magmatic episode was likely restricted in time and did not span as much of the Mesozoic as suggested by the previously published K–Ar and Ar–Ar data. In fact, some of the contrasting values provided by these dating methods on some of the same bodies dated here by U–Pb (Nejbert et al. Reference Nejbert, Krajewski, Dubinska and Pecskay2011; S. Polteau, unpub. data, 2011) prove that the Ar systems in several cases have been severely reset by secondary events. The geological reasons for the isotopic disturbances are not straightforward. Our sample 7A was affected by very intense alteration which transformed the plagioclase in particular and also, to various degrees, the other minerals. The growth of rutile and titanite appears to be the expression of different stages of this alteration. The fact that rutile yields the same age as coexisting magmatic zircon shows that this specific alteration event, likely related to the local breakdown of pyroxene, occurred immediately after emplacement of the unit, probably as a response to the fluids activated in the contact metamorphic aureole. Titanite does not appear to be associated with or derived from rutile and was likely produced by some other reaction, although in thin section the link is difficult to establish. The up to 1 Ma younger age of the titanite supports its formation by a distinct reaction, presumably as a response to late fluid activity promoted by subsequent magmatic pulses. Interestingly, none of these minerals were affected by the younger disturbances recorded in the K–Ar systems, such as the K–Ar ages of 92 and 81 Ma reported for the Diasbasodden sill (Nejbert et al. Reference Nejbert, Krajewski, Dubinska and Pecskay2011) showing that the latter were likely affected by other weak and very local effects. Unless confirmed by independent evidence, the significance of the Ar ages therefore remains the subject of some uncertainty.
5.b. HALIP magmatism in the Arctic context
In light of the above considerations it is evident that some of the chronologic evidence used to formulate correlations and propose specific processes associated with the opening of the Arctic oceanic basins is problematic. Some of the chronology is based on fairly solid U–Pb results, such as the c. 90 Ma ages of the Hansen Point volcanics and the Wootton Intrusion in northern Ellesmere Island (Trettin & Parrish, Reference Trettin and Parrish1987) or the 70–60 Ma Kap Washington Suite in northern Greenland (Thorarinsson et al. Reference Thorarinsson, Holm, Tappe, Heaman and Tegner2011). Other chronological evidence is more uncertain and should be verified by more robust dating methods. The present study suggests that HALIP consists of one volcanic province in the Barents Sea (BLIP) that is older by c. 40 Ma, but overlaps in geographic distribution with the younger volcanic event dominating the Canadian Arctic. The study further shows that it is possible to find units and minerals datable by U–Pb by applying informed and systematic search criteria. The new U–Pb ages, together with the confined stratigraphic interval of the lava flows, suggest that the magmatic episode was likely restricted in time and did not span as much of the Mesozoic as suggested by the K–Ar and Ar–Ar data.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge a Petrobar grant to Sverre Plancke. Ivar Midtkandal and Ellen Eckhoff-Planke are thanked for their assistance in Svalbard during field work and collection of samples. The UNIS CO2 Lab kindly allowed the sampling of the tuff from the BH3 borehole and Snorre Olaussen and Alvar Braathen (UNIS) helped with the sampling. We are also grateful to NPD for their support and the Laboratory of Mineralogical and Fission Track Analysis of the Geological Institute, Russian Academy who carefully extracted zircon and baddeleyite from the samples from Franz Josef Land. Finally, we thank Sandra Kamo and an anonymous reviewer for constructive reviews.
