Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T09:17:14.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Determination of two structures of the solvent 3-hydroxypropionitrile crystallized at low temperatures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2024

Pamela S. Whitfield*
Affiliation:
Excelsus Structural Solutions (Swiss AG), Park Innovaare, Villigen, Switzerland National Research Council Canada, 1200 Montreal Road, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0R6
Zouina Karkar
Affiliation:
National Research Council Canada, 1200 Montreal Road, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0R6
Yaser Abu-Lebdeh
Affiliation:
National Research Council Canada, 1200 Montreal Road, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0R6
*
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: whitfieldps1@gmail.com

Abstract

The title compound, 3-hydroxypropionitrile, was crystallized repeatedly in situ inside a quartz capillary using a liquid nitrogen cryostream. The X-ray powder diffraction patterns obtained indicated the presence of two distinct crystalline phases. The cleanest datasets for each of the phases were used to solve the crystal structures via simulated annealing, followed by refinement and optimization via dispersion-corrected density functional theory (DFT) calculations, with a final Rietveld refinement against the experimental data. The two structures appear to correspond to those proposed in a 1960s literature vibrational spectroscopy paper, one being the more stable with a gauche molecular conformation and the second metastable phase more complex with mixed conformations. Dispersion-corrected DFT computation using lattice parameters for both phases obtained from a single 84 K dataset with co-existing phases shows the stable and metastable phases to differ in energy by less than 0.5 kJ mol−1. A comparison of experimental far infrared spectra published in the 1960s with those calculated from the proposed crystal structures provides some independent supporting evidence for the proposed structures.

Information

Type
Technical Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Centre for Diffraction Data
Figure 0

Figure 1. Raw data of the stable phase at 183 K and metastable phase at 218 K. The 183 K data have been displaced vertically by 3000 counts to improve clarity.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Pawley fit using the proposed orthorhombic unit cell with Pbca reflection conditions. Rwp = 7.2%.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Rietveld difference plot for the refinement of the orthorhombic form from the DFT-optimized starting point versus one of the pure-phase patterns at 183 K.

Figure 3

Figure 4. View of the final refined structure of the orthorhombic form showing the zig-zag chain of O–H⋯O hydrogen bonds running in the b-direction.

Figure 4

TABLE I. Atomic coordinates of the orthorhombic crystal-II phase of 3-HPN at 183 K

Figure 5

Figure 5. Gauche conformation of the 3-HPN molecule in the crystal-II phase showing how the hydroxyl and nitrile groups arrange themselves relative to each other.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Pawley fit using a primitive monoclinic unit cell with P21/n reflection conditions. Rwp = 7.0%.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Rietveld difference plot for the refinement of the monoclinic form at 218 K.

Figure 8

Figure 8. View of the final refined structure of the monoclinic form showing the helical chains of O–H⋯O hydrogen bonds running parallel to the b-direction. The insert shows the hydrogen bonding along b*, highlighting the characteristic triangle of a 31-like screw axis.

Figure 9

TABLE II. Atomic coordinates of the monoclinic crystal-I phase of 3-HPN at 218 K

Figure 10

Figure 9. Conformations of the three independent 3-HPN molecules in the crystal-I phase.

Figure 11

TABLE III. Comparison of the O–H⋯O hydrogen bonding environments in the orthorhombic and monoclinic phases from the final refined structures

Figure 12

TABLE IV. Comparison of the weak C–H⋯N intermolecular hydrogen bonding environments in the crystal-II and crystal-I phases from the final refined structures

Figure 13

Figure 10. Two-phase refinement of a dataset collected at 84 K.

Figure 14

TABLE V. Lattice parameters obtained from Pawley refinement of the two-phase dataset in Figure 10 at 84 K

Figure 15

Figure 11. Comparison of experimental and DFPT-calculated far-IR region for (a) crystal-I and (b) crystal-II. Experimental data extracted from Schneider (1969).

Supplementary material: File

Whitfield et al. supplementary material 1

Whitfield et al. supplementary material
Download Whitfield et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 282.5 KB
Supplementary material: File

Whitfield et al. supplementary material 2

Whitfield et al. supplementary material
Download Whitfield et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 274.1 KB
Supplementary material: File

Whitfield et al. supplementary material 3

Whitfield et al. supplementary material
Download Whitfield et al. supplementary material 3(File)
File 2.5 MB