Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T00:48:39.172Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The oxygen uptake efficiency slope in adults with CHD: group validity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2024

J. M. Redfern*
Affiliation:
Countess of Chester Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Chester, UK
S. Hawkes
Affiliation:
Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, LP, UK
A. Bryan
Affiliation:
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, GM, UK
D. Cullington
Affiliation:
Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, LP, UK
R. Ashrafi
Affiliation:
Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, LP, UK
*
Corresponding author: J. M. Redfern; Email: james.redfern4@nhs.net
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The maximal oxygen uptake (V02 max) is a well-validated measure of cardiorespiratory function that is calculated during a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test. V02 max enables physicians to objectively assess cardiopulmonary function to aid in decision-making for patients with CHD. A significant proportion of these patients however are unable to achieve a maximal exercise test, and as such, there is a need for reliable submaximal predictors of cardiorespiratory reserve.

The oxygen uptake efficiency slope represents a measure of how effectively oxygen is extracted from the lungs and taken into the body and can be calculated from a submaximal exercise test. Its reliability as a predictor of cardiorespiratory reserve has been validated in various patient populations, but there is limited evidence for its validity in adult patients with CHD.

Retrospective analysis of cardiopulmonary exercise test data in 238 consecutive patients with CHD who completed a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test at our tertiary cardiology centre demonstrated a strong correlation between peak V02 and the oxygen uptake efficiency slope (0.936). A strong correlation with peak V02 was also demonstrated when oxygen uptake efficiency slope was calculated at ventilatory anaerobic threshold (OUESVAT), 75% (OUES75), and 90% (OUES90) of the test (0.833, 0.905, 0.927 respectively).

In adult patients with CHD who are unable to complete a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test, the oxygen uptake efficiency slope is a reliable indicator of cardiopulmonary fitness which correlates strongly with peak V02 at or beyond the ventilatory anaerobic threshold. Further research is required to validate the findings in patients with less common anatomies and to assess the relationship between the oxygen uptake efficiency slope and mortality.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Relationship between the oxygen uptake and the minute ventilation during a cardiopulmonary exercise test in a healthy 27-year-old woman, and in sex and age-matched patients with transposition of the great arteries and Fontan circulation. The values of the oxygen uptake efficiency slope are 2.49, 1.50, and 0.96, respectively, and the data are presented as linear (top graph) and semi-log plots of the x-axis (bottom graph). TGA: transposition of the great arteries, VE: minute ventilation, VO2; oxygen uptake.

Figure 1

Table 1. Characteristics of study participants.

Figure 2

Table 2. Exercise test characteristics.

Figure 3

Table 3. Relationships between cardiopulmonary exercise testing and oxygen uptake efficiency slope variables for the combined and separate patient cohorts.

Figure 4

Figure 2. Graphical representation of oxygen uptake efficiency slope calculation from the entire test, from first 90%, from first 75% and at ventilatory anaerobic threshold. VE; minute ventilation, VO2; oxygen uptake, OUES100; oxygen uptake efficiency slope from the entire test, OUES90; oxygen uptake efficiency slope from first 90%, OUES75; oxygen uptake efficiency slope from first 75%, OUESVAT; oxygen uptake efficiency slope at ventilatory anaerobic threshold.

Figure 5

Figure 3. Relationship between peak V02 and OUES100 (top left); peak V02 and OUES90 (top right); peak V02 and OUES75 (bottom left); peak V02 and OUESVAT (bottom right). Peak V02; maximum oxygen uptake, OUES75; oxygen uptake efficiency slope from the first 75% of the test, OUES90; oxygen uptake efficiency slope from the first 90% of the test, OUES100; the oxygen uptake efficiency slope from the entire test, OUESVAT; oxygen uptake efficiency slope at ventilatory anaerobic threshold.

Figure 6

Figure 4. Correlation of OUES100 with OUES90 and OUES75. OUES75; oxygen uptake efficiency slope from the first 75% of the test, OUES90; oxygen uptake efficiency slope from the first 90% of the test, OUES100; oxygen uptake efficiency slope from the entire test.