Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T12:30:55.380Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sexual traits and reproductive strategy of the leucosiid crab Pyrhila pisum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2020

Satoshi Kobayashi*
Affiliation:
Hakozaki 3-36-36-401, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka City, 812-0053, Japan
Miguel Vazquez Archdale
Affiliation:
Fisheries Resources Sciences Division, Faculty of Fisheries, Kagoshima University, Shimoarata 4-50-20, Kagoshima City, 890-0056, Japan
*
Author for correspondence: Satoshi Kobayashi, E-mail: mokuzuz@rock.odn.ne.jp
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mating strategy and sexual dimorphism of morphological traits of the leucosiid crab Pyrhila pisum were elucidated by analysing relative growth patterns of chelipeds and abdomen, and gonad development patterns. Male adults had long chelipeds compared with juvenile males and females. Among male adults, two phases with different slopes could be found in the regression lines; their chelipeds growth pattern changed from negative allometry to positive and longer chelipeds developed in large adults. The growth is more markedly expressed in the merus than in the propodus. Female adults had wider abdominal segments and a thicker body compared with juvenile females and males. Abdomen of females was greatly enlarged by a puberty moult. Male adults had well-developed gonads similar to female adults, and the weights of male gonads were often larger than those of females of the same body size. For adult males, a negative correlation was detected between carapace width and the weight ratio of their gonads, but no significant relationship was detected for adult females. Females had large and well-bloated seminal receptacles, whose weight was nearly equal to gonad weight. There was little difference in the amount of seminal receptacles regardless of the body size of females. There is a trade-off relationship in the development between chelipeds and gonads in adult males. Probably young adult males compensate for the disadvantageous condition of guarding by increasing the number of spermatozoids, and old adult males invest more of their energy to their chelae for guarding while decreasing investment in sperm production.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2020
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Position of measurement, (A): carapace (silhouette), (B) ventral view, (C) lateral view (silhouette). CW, carapace width; CPL, chela propodus length; CML, chela merus length; AW, width of 5th abdominal segment; BT, body thickness.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Photographs of whole body of Pyrhila pisum from the ventral side view. (A) juvenile male; (B) adult male; (C) juvenile female; (D) adult female.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Relationships between carapace width (CW) and propodus length (CPL) and merus length (CML) of chelipeds of juvenile and adult Pyrhila pisum, with regression line relative to CW of each phase. Axes are normal logarithmic.

Figure 3

Table 1. Allometry analysis between pairs of transformed morphological variables (independent variable vs dependent variable): log (carapace width, CW), log (chela propodus length, CPL), log (chela merus length, CML), log (abdominal width, AW), log (body thickness, BT)

Figure 4

Table 2. Results of analysis of covariance between regression lines fitted for each growth phase of chela propodus length (CPL) and chela merus length (CML) of Pyrhila pisum

Figure 5

Fig. 4. Relationships between carapace width (CW) and width of 5th abdominal segment (AW) and body thickness (BT) of juvenile and adult Pyrhila pisum, with regression line relative to CW of each phase. Axes are normal logarithmic.

Figure 6

Table 3. Results of analysis of covariance between regression lines fitted for each growth phase of abdominal width (AW) and body thickness (BT) of Pyrhila pisum

Figure 7

Fig. 5. Photographs of reproductive organs of Pyrhila pisum. (A) male; (B) female; (C) female (ovary removed). 1: testis, 2: ovary, 3: seminal receptacle.

Figure 8

Fig. 6. Relationship between carapace width (CW) and weight of gonads and its ratio to body weight (%), and seminal receptacles of Pyrhila pisum. Broken lines indicate 5% of body weight estimated for each carapace width.