Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T09:36:30.302Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Near-axis expansion of stellarator equilibrium at arbitrary order in the distance to the axis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2020

R. Jorge*
Affiliation:
Institute for Research in Electronics and Applied Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
W. Sengupta
Affiliation:
Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University, New York, NY 10012, USA
M. Landreman
Affiliation:
Institute for Research in Electronics and Applied Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: rjorge@umd.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A direct construction of equilibrium magnetic fields with toroidal topology at arbitrary order in the distance from the magnetic axis is carried out, yielding an analytical framework able to explore the landscape of possible magnetic flux surfaces in the vicinity of the axis. This framework can provide meaningful analytical insight into the character of high-aspect-ratio stellarator shapes, such as the dependence of the rotational transform and the plasma beta limit on geometrical properties of the resulting flux surfaces. The approach developed here is based on an asymptotic expansion on the inverse aspect ratio of the ideal magnetohydrodynamics equation. The analysis is simplified by using an orthogonal coordinate system relative to the Frenet–Serret frame at the magnetic axis. The magnetic field vector, the toroidal magnetic flux, the current density, the field line label and the rotational transform are derived at arbitrary order in the expansion parameter. Moreover, a comparison with a near-axis expansion formalism employing an inverse coordinate method based on Boozer coordinates (the so-called Garren–Boozer construction) is made, where both methods are shown to agree at lowest order. Finally, as a practical example, a numerical solution using a W7-X equilibrium is presented, and a comparison between the lowest-order solution and the W7-X magnetic field is performed.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2020
Figure 0

Figure 1. Example of a magnetic surface using Mercier’s coordinates, where the radial coordinate $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}$ is prescribed as a function of $s$ and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}=\unicode[STIX]{x1D703}+\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}$ in order to obtain a toroidal shape with elliptical cross-section. The magnetic axis curve is shown in black, together with the Frenet–Serret unit vectors, namely the tangent (cyan), normal (grey) and binormal (orange) unit vectors. The blue and yellow lines in the outermost surface denote the curves with constant $\unicode[STIX]{x1D703}$ and $s$, respectfully.

Figure 1

Table 1. Fitting results of the W7-X surface $\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}=0.01~\text{T}~\text{m}^{-2}$ to the expressions in (3.31) and (C 1). Only the parameters with absolute value greater than $0.01$ are shown.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Eight equally spaced cross-sections with $0\leqslant \unicode[STIX]{x1D6F7}<2\unicode[STIX]{x03C0}/5$. (a,c) VMEC (full lines) and best-fit results (dashed lines) for the lowest-order expression for $\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}$ in (3.31). (b,d) VMEC (full lines) and best-fit results (dashed lines) for the higher-order expression for $\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}$ in (C 1). (a,b) Fit to surface with $\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}=0.01~\text{T}~\text{m}^{-2}$. (c,d) fit to surface with $\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}=0.44~\text{T}~\text{m}^{-2}$.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Magnetic field strength in the flux surface from VMEC (a,c) and from the lowest-order fit (b,d) using the first-order expression for $B=|\unicode[STIX]{x1D735}\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}|$ in (7.9). (a,b) Inner surface with $\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}=0.01~\text{T}~\text{m}^{2}$. (c,d) Plasma boundary with $\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}=2.19~\text{T}~\text{m}^{2}$.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Left: cross-section of VMEC (full lines) and the best-fit results (dashed lines) at lowest order (a) and higher order (b) at $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6F7}=2\unicode[STIX]{x03C0}/10$; Right: cross-section of VMEC (full lines) and the best-fit results (dashed lines) at lowest order (c) and higher order (d) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6F7}=0$.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Cross-section of VMEC (full lines) and the best-fit results (dashed lines) at lowest order (a) and higher order (b) at $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6F7}=\unicode[STIX]{x03C0}/10$.

Figure 6

Figure 6. (a) W7-X plasma boundary. (b) Resulting surface from the nonlinear squares fit of (3.31) to (7.7). The colours show the magnetic field strength on the surface.