Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T00:15:09.166Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Phenakite and bertrandite: products of post-magmatic alteration of beryl in granitic pegmatites (Tatric Superunit, Western Carpathians, Slovakia)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2022

Pavel Uher*
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy, Petrology and Economic Geology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Ilkovičova 6, 842 15 Bratislava, Slovakia
Daniel Ozdín
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy, Petrology and Economic Geology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Ilkovičova 6, 842 15 Bratislava, Slovakia
Peter Bačík
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy, Petrology and Economic Geology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Ilkovičova 6, 842 15 Bratislava, Slovakia Earth Science Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 840 05 Bratislava, Slovakia
Martin Števko
Affiliation:
Earth Science Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 840 05 Bratislava, Slovakia
Martin Ondrejka
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy, Petrology and Economic Geology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Ilkovičova 6, 842 15 Bratislava, Slovakia
Olena Rybnikova
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy, Petrology and Economic Geology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Ilkovičova 6, 842 15 Bratislava, Slovakia
Štěpán Chládek
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Engineering, Faculty of Mining and Geology, VŠB – Technical University of Ostrava, 17. listopadu 15, 708 33 Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic
Jana Fridrichová
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy, Petrology and Economic Geology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Ilkovičova 6, 842 15 Bratislava, Slovakia
Jaroslav Pršek
Affiliation:
AGH University of Science and Technology, Department of Mineralogy, Petrography and Geochemistry, 30–059 Kraków, Mickiewicza 30, Poland
Ľubica Puškelová
Affiliation:
Earth Science Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 840 05 Bratislava, Slovakia
*
*Author for correspondence: Pavel Uher, Email: pavel.uher@uniba.sk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The beryllium silicate minerals phenakite and bertrandite have been identified in granitic pegmatite dykes of the beryl-columbite subtype of Variscan age (~340−355 Ma), associated with S- to I-type granitic rocks of the Tatric Superunit, Western Carpathians (Slovakia). The two beryllium silicates and associated minerals were characterised by electron microprobe analysis, back-scattered electron petrography and cathodoluminescence imagery, X-ray diffraction and micro-Raman techniques. Phenakite and bertrandite form euhedral-to-anhedral crystals and aggregates in irregular domains and veinlets replacing primary magmatic beryl. A detailed textural study revealed a close genetic association of phenakite and bertrandite with secondary fine-grained quartz, K-feldspar and muscovite. Locally, clay phyllosilicate minerals, (with compositions similar to those of Fe-dominant hydrobiotite, beidellite, nontronite and saponite) occur as the youngest minerals. During the post-magmatic (hydrothermal) stage of the pegmatites, infiltration of aqueous K-bearing fluids at T ≈ 200–400°C resulted in the breakdown of magmatic beryl to secondary assemblages containing phenakite and bertrandite.

Information

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Simplified geological map of the Western Carpathians with the locations of the investigated pegmatites investigated of the Tatric Superunit. Area 1 represents the pegmatites of the Bratislava Massif (BLS to BOR occurrences), 2: MOR, 3: PRA, 4: DUB and 5: SOL pegmatites. For locality symbols and their geographic locations see Table 1.

Figure 1

Table 1. Geographic regions, locations and locality symbols of the Tatric beryl-bearing granitic pegmatites investigated.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Beryl breakdown to phenakite and associated minerals from the Tatric pegmatites: (a−e, g) back-scattered electron (BSE) images; (f,h) cathodoluminescence (CL) images. Mineral abbreviations include Brl (beryl), Phk (phenakite), Qz (quartz), Ms (muscovite) and Hbt (mineral similar to hydrobiotite). Pegmatite locations: BRQ (a), BZS (b), BLS (c,d), BJL (e,f) and BKA (g,h). For locality symbols see Table 1.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Beryl breakdown to bertrandite and associated minerals from the Tatric pegmatites: (a−h) back-scattered electron (BSE) images. Mineral abbreviations include Brl (beryl), Btd (bertrandite), Qz (quartz), Ms (muscovite), Kfs (K-feldspar), Gis (gismondine-Ca), Hbt (mineral similar to hydrobiotite) and Sap (mineral similar to saponite). Pegmatite locations: BJL (a), SOL (b), BHL (c−f) and MOR (g,h). For locality symbols see Table 1.

Figure 4

Table 2. Secondary beryllium and associated minerals in the Tatric pegmatites studied. Mineral abbreviations: Phk (phenakite), Btd (bertrandite), Ms (muscovite), Kfs (K-feldspar), Qz (quartz), Hbt (hydrobiotite-like mineral), Bei-Non (beidellite-nontronite-like mineral), Sap (saponite-like mineral), Py (pyrite), Sp (sphalerite), Gn (galena), Brt (baryte), Czo-Ep (clinozoisite-epidote), Gis (gismondine-Ca), Cal (calcite).

Figure 5

Fig. 4. The Fe + Mn + Zn + Mg vs. Na + K + Rb + Cs (apfu) diagram of beryl (Barton and Young, 2002) from the Tatric pegmatites. Fe = Fe2+ + Fe3+. For locality symbols see Table 1.

Figure 6

Table 3. Representative compositions of beryl from the Tatric pegmatites (wt.%). BeO wt.% content was calculated by stoichiometry assuming 3 Be atoms per formula unit. For locality symbols see Table 1.

Figure 7

Table 4. Representative compositions of phenakite from the Tatric pegmatites (wt.%). BeO wt.% content was calculated by stoichiometry assuming 2 Be atoms per formula unit. For locality symbols see Table 1.

Figure 8

Table 5. Representative compositions of bertrandite from the Tatric pegmatites (wt.%). BeO and H2O wt.% contents were calculated by stoichiometry assuming 4 Be atoms and 2 (OH) per formula unit. For locality symbols see Table 1.

Figure 9

Fig. 5. (a) Muscovite composition in Al total vs. Si + Fe + Mn + Mg (apfu) diagram; (b) muscovite vs. beryl Fe/(Fe + Mg) diagram from the Tatric pegmatites. Fe = Fe2+ + Fe3+; atomic proportions. For locality symbols see Table 1.

Figure 10

Table 6. Representative compositions of phyllosilicate minerals from the Tatric pegmatites (wt.%). For locality symbols see Table 1.

Figure 11

Fig. 6. In situ micro-Raman spectrum of phenakite, Bratislava, Rössler Quarry pegmatite (BRQ, sample BM-3Be).

Figure 12

Fig. 7. In situ micro-Raman spectrum of bertrandite, Bratislava, Jezuitské Lesy pegmatite pegmatite (BJL, sample BMD-1).

Figure 13

Table 7. Unit-cell parameters of phenakite and bertrandite from Bratislava, Líščia Stráň pegmatite (BLS locality; BD-1, BD-5, BD-6, BM-66-2 samples) with comparison to published data.

Figure 14

Fig. 8. The BeO–Al2O3–SiO2–K2O system projected from K2O onto the BeO–Al2O3–SiO2 plane of identified (black circles) and other important minerals (grey circles). Ideal end-member mineral compositions are plotted. Mineral abbreviations include Brl (beryl), Phk (phenakite), Btd (bertrandite), Ms (muscovite), Kln (kaolinite), Hly (halloysite), Kfs (K-feldspar), Qz (quartz), Prl (pyrophyllite), Ecs (euclase), Byt (beryllite), Sbtd (sphaerobertrandite), Bmel (bromellite), Beh (behoite), Cbht (clinobehoite), Cbrl (chrysoberyl), And (andalusite), Ky (kyanite), Sil (sillimanite) and Crn (corundum, Al-oxide–hydroxides).