Introduction
Postpartum depression (PPD) is one of the main complications of perinatal period [Reference Howard, Molyneaux, Dennis, Rochat, Stein and Milgrom1]. Two peaks of occurrence are described: early-onset PPD beginning in the first 2 months after childbirth and late-onset PPD beginning between the 2nd and 12th month postpartum [Reference Stowe, Hostetter and Newport2–Reference Rosenwald and Stonehill5]. Our study among the interaction of gene and environment of depression during postpartum (IGEDEPP) women, in the Paris areas (France), showed 1-year cumulative incidence of PPD of 18.1%, a prevalence of early-onset PPD of 8.3%, and a prevalence of late-onset PPD of 12.9% [Reference Tebeka, Le Strat, De Premorel Higgons, Benachi, Dommergues and Kayem6], in line with previous works [Reference Norhayati, Hazlina, Asrenee and Emilin7]. Indeed, PPD is associated with significant morbidity and mortality for mothers: onset of chronic psychiatric disorders, non-psychiatric disorders, and mortality due to both natural and unnatural causes such as suicide [Reference Vacheron, Tessier, Rossignol and Deneux-Tharaux8]. Suicide is the cause of more than 4% of maternal deaths [Reference Metz, Rovner, Hoffman, Allshouse, Beckwith and Binswanger9], and currently, the co-first cause of maternal death in France. Children of mothers with PPD may have eating or sleeping disorders and be at an increased risk for cognitive, psychomotor, emotional, and social development disorders [Reference Grace, Evindar and Stewart10–Reference Stein, Pearson, Goodman, Rapa, Rahman and McCallum13]. While PPD is a major cause of maternal and pediatric morbidity needing prevention and treatment, its causes remain poorly known.
This disorder is a complex multifactorial disease with sociodemographic, environmental, psychiatric, and genetic determinants [Reference Howard, Molyneaux, Dennis, Rochat, Stein and Milgrom1,Reference Tebeka, Le Strat and Dubertret14,Reference Tebeka, Strat, Mandelbrot, Benachi, Dommergues and Kayem15]. We have previously shown that sociodemographic, clinical, and environmental determinants of early- and late-onset PPD are different, suggesting partially overlapping pathophysiological mechanisms [Reference Tebeka, Strat, Mandelbrot, Benachi, Dommergues and Kayem15,Reference Tebeka, Le, Etain, Ray, Mullaert and Dubertret16]. However, in both types of PPD, personal and family histories of depression are important risk factors for PPD, suggesting a genetic vulnerability. Family aggregation studies confirmed a 2 or 3-fold risk of PPD when a first-degree relative had a PPD history [Reference Murphy-Eberenz, Zandi, March, Crowe, Scheftner and Alexander17,Reference Payne, MacKinnon, Mondimore, McInnis, Schweizer and Zamoiski18]. Twin studies estimated that PPD heritability is approximately 50%, a third of which is not shared with the genetic variance of depression in the general population; this result suggests that the genetic etiologies for perinatal depression and non-perinatal depression only partially overlap [Reference Viktorin, Meltzer-Brody, Kuja-Halkola, Sullivan, Landen and Lichtenstein19].
Numerous studies have focused on PPD candidate genes, in particular those encoding transporters, neurotransmitters or molecules involved in postpartum neurohormonal changes [Reference Elwood, Murray, Bell, Sinclair, Kernohan and Stockdale20–Reference Figueiredo, Parada, de Araujo, Silva and Del-Ben23]. For instance, several studies have shown that functional polymorphisms of SLC6A4/5-HTT gene (5HTTLPR and STin2-VNTR) were associated with the risk of early-onset PPD but not with late-onset PPD [Reference Sanjuan, Martin-Santos, Garcia-Esteve, Carot, Guillamat and Gutierrez-Zotes24–Reference Binder, Newport, Zach, Smith, Deveau and Altshuler26]. However, PPD is a complex disease where several genes likely interact synergistically with a relatively minor effect exerted by each gene individually [Reference Fan, Hu, Xin, Zhao and Wang27]. A pangenomic approach, without any a priori pathophysiological hypothesis, could confirm or disconfirm the involvement of genetic factors, and ultimately characterize unknown biological pathways.
Several genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been carried out on depression in the general population, but none specifically in the postpartum population [Reference Wray, Ripke and Mattheisen28]. Recently, a meta-analysis carried out on 246,363 cases of major depressive disorder (MDD) and 561,190 controls identified 102 independent genetic variants and 15 sets of genes associated with depression, including genes and genetic pathways associated with synaptic structure and neurotransmission [Reference Howard, Adams, Clarke, Hafferty, Gibson and Shirali29]. In an independent replication sample of 414,055 cases and 892,299 controls, 87 of the 102 associated variants were replicated [Reference Howard, Adams, Clarke, Hafferty, Gibson and Shirali29]. A GWAS was published on perinatal depression, including depression during pregnancy and PPD up to 6 months postpartum, without identifying any associated genetic variants [Reference Kiewa, Meltzer‐Brody, Milgrom, Guintivano, Hickie and Whiteman30]. More recently, a meta-analysis of 18 European cohorts (including IGEDEPP data) failed to identify a genetic marker of PPD in the year following childbirth [Reference Guintivano, Byrne, Kiewa, Yao, Bauer and Aberg31].
Classically, GWAS analysis identifies a set of variants, each contributing a small effect. In this context, the PRS allows all variants to be considered for further analysis in independent samples [Reference Ikeda, Saito, Kanazawa and Iwata32]. In addition, five studies have investigated the genetic overlap between perinatal psychiatric disorders and mood disorders, both MDD and bipolar disorder (BD) [Reference Kiewa, Meltzer‐Brody, Milgrom, Guintivano, Hickie and Whiteman30,Reference Byrne, Carrillo-Roa, Penninx, Sallis, Viktorin and Chapman33–Reference Rantalainen, Binder, Lahti-Pulkkinen, Czamara, Laivuori and Villa36]. All of these studies found genetic overlap with MDD, although the specific phenotypes of perinatal psychiatric disorder used differed between studies. The results for BD were inconsistent: three studies found a genetic overlap of PPD with BD [Reference Byrne, Carrillo-Roa, Penninx, Sallis, Viktorin and Chapman33,Reference Pouget, Taylor, Dennis, Grigoriadis, Oberlander and Frey35,Reference Kiewa, Meltzer‐Brody, Milgrom, Guintivano, Hickie and Whiteman30] and two studies did not [Reference Bauer, Liu, Byrne, Sullivan, Wray and Agerbo34,Reference Rantalainen, Binder, Lahti-Pulkkinen, Czamara, Laivuori and Villa36]. These different conclusions may reflect the different clinical evaluations and/or perinatal phenotypes used. Indeed, different disorders are assessed in each of the studies: depression, mood disorders (including puerperal psychosis), and perinatal psychiatric disorders (considering the prescription of psychotropic drugs). The timeframe considered also differs among studies: some consider early postpartum only, others up to 1 year postpartum, and still others the entire peripartum period including pregnancy. Defining a precise and homogenous phenotype of PPD should help to better characterize its determinants and lead to a better understanding of its genetic architecture.
Our work is based on data from IGEDEPP, which is the largest prospective multicenter cohort of French postpartum women with follow-up for 1 year. Assessment for depression was performed at three time points (immediately after childbirth, 8 weeks, and 1 year postpartum) by a trained clinician using reliable DSM-5 criteria. We hypothesize that early-onset PPD and late-onset PPD are two phenotypes that have distinct genetic substrates. We reported here the results of the first GWAS on PPD distinguishing early and late-onset PPD using an extremely dense single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping array. Finally, post-GWAS analysis was performed for significant associated regions by using Functional Mapping and Annotation of Genome-Wide Association Studies (FUMA) [Reference Watanabe, Taskesen, van Bochoven and Posthuma37] and gene expression analyses to identify quantitative trait loci (QTL) using GTEx-portal and PsychENCODE.
Patients and methods
Patients
IGEDEPP is a French prospective cohort of 3,310 women from 8 maternity departments in the Paris metropolitan area and included between November 2011 and June 2016. All of the women were over 18 years old, French speaking, and of European ancestry (defined by self-declaration of the four grandparents born in Europe).
Women were evaluated at three-time points by a clinician trained to assess depression using the semi-structured interview of the Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies (DIGS), based on DSM-5 criteria [Reference Nurnberger, Blehar, Kaufmann, York-Cooler, Simpson and Harkavy-Friedman38]. Among the women included in the maternity department between the 2nd and 5th day postpartum, 91.1% were followed up at 8 weeks postpartum to assess early-onset PPD, and 71.0% at 1 year after childbirth to assess late-onset PPD. A blood sample was taken at the maternity department after informed consent was received. Further details regarding this cohort can be found in [Reference Tebeka, Le Strat, De Premorel Higgons, Benachi, Dommergues and Kayem6].
The research protocol (ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT01648816), including informed consent procedures, was approved by the Data Protection and Freedom of Information Commissions and the French Ethics Committee (Ile de France I).
Definition of cases and controls
In the present work, we included only women who had a clinical diagnosis of early and late-onset PPD (N = 1,661) to define cases and controls.
Among the cases, 234 met the criteria for early-onset PPD (presence of a major depressive episode with onset from delivery up to 2 months postpartum), and 223 met the criteria for late-onset PPD (presence of a major depressive episode with onset between 2 months and 1 year postpartum). Early- and late-onset PPD were exclusive categories.
The control group consisted of 1,204 women evaluated at the same three times points as the PPD group (at the maternity department, 8-week postpartum and at 1-year postpartum) and who had not presented a depressive episode within their lifetime: either before pregnancy, during pregnancy, or postpartum (early and late). These controls are considered “super controls” for this investigation because no depression was reported at any point during their lifetime.
DNA extraction and genotyping
DNA was extracted from blood samples and genotyping was performed using the Illumina Global Screening Array with a multidisease drop-in panel (GSA-MD v1.0). Genotyping was performed at the CNRGH (Evry, France) on an Illumina automated high-throughput genotyping platform, according to manufacturer’s instructions. To validate results after imputation, two imputed SNPs (rs6028723 and rs6129447) on chromosome 20 were genotyped by TaqMan® SNP genotyping assays (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using an Applied Biosystems 7900HT Sequence detection system. Taqman genotyping was also performed at CNRGH.
Quality control and imputation
Quality control (QC) was performed for all patients all genotyped patients, regardless of their known PPD status, according to the Turner et al recommendations [Reference Turner, Armstrong, Bradford, Carlson, Crawford and Crenshaw39]. Genotype imputation was performed using the pre-phasing/imputation stepwise approach implemented in IMPUTE2/SHAPEIT, and imputation reference set was 1000Genomes/phase 3 [Reference Howie, Donnelly and Marchini40].
The number of SNPs and samples excluded at each stage of QC before and after imputation, as well as their parameters, are described in Figure S1 and in the Supplementary methods section. Of the 687,571 variants genotyped by the chip, 288,039 were selected after this QC (note that 388,277 variants were excluded because they had an MAF ≤ 0.05, Figure S2), and 50 patients were removed from subsequent analysis. More than 10 million markers were added through imputation, and 7.1 million were retained by QC performed after imputation.
A principal component analysis (PCA) was performed on a collection of SNPs (detailed in Supplementary methods and reported in Figure S3).
Genome-wide association analyses
The association analysis was conducted with a general regression model (GRM), which corresponds to a corresponds to a 2-degree of freedom test based on a logistic regression model that allows for the testing of an association without assumption of the genetic model and avoids loss of power in the case of deviation from additivity. The GRM used an additive and a dominance deviation term for the logistic regression, with the coding of 0/1/2 for the additive term (Add) and 0/1/0 for the dominance deviation term (DomDev) for AA, Aa, and aa genotypes, respectively, with a risk allele. GRM allows to test the genetic model in a second time [Reference Dizier, Demenais and Mathieu41,Reference Gloaguen, Dizier, Boissel, Rocheleau, Canouil and Froguel42]: comparison of the regression coefficient of Add and DomDev terms in a case of association test allowed for the selection of the best genetic model. Despite testing multiple genetic models, the GRM procedure yields p-values for association that do not need to be adjusted for multiple tests. The statistical significance thresholds were 5 × 10–8 and 0.01 for SNP-phenotype association assessment and genetic model selection, respectively. All imputed SNPs that passed quality control were tested without post-imputation pruning. For each significant marker, the association was tested a second time with the selected genetic model to obtain odd ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) from asymptotic approximation. The percentage of explained variance was estimated based on the selected genetic models.
For the two imputed genotyped markers, the association was tested directly with the selected genetic model. For each phenotype, a further GWAS analysis was performed using the most significant SNP as a covariate.
A sensitivity analysis, where 8 individuals that seem to be outliers according to Figure S3 are removed, has also been conducted.
Quality controls and association analysis were carried out using Plink software (version 1.9) [Reference Chang, Chow, Tellier, Vattikuti, Purcell and Lee43], and R console, Manhattan plot was performed by the qqman package [Reference Turner, Armstrong, Bradford, Carlson, Crawford and Crenshaw39], and regional plots and R 2 estimations were obtained using LDlink [Reference Machiela and Chanock44].
Post-GWAS analyses
To evaluate the functional impact of candidate markers, FUMA (v1.3.7) [Reference Watanabe, Taskesen, van Bochoven and Posthuma37] was used with default settings, with gene-based, gene-pathway, and tissue-enrichment analyses performed by MAGMA [Reference de Leeuw, Mooij, Heskes and Posthuma45]. Correction for gene analysis was calculated by Bonferroni correction as 0.05/number of tested genes (with 17766 genes, the threshold was 2.8 × 10–6). Tissue-enrichment analysis included genotype-tissue expression (GTEx) v8 expression data [46] and BrainSpan [Reference Kang, Kawasawa, Cheng, Zhu, Xu and Li47].
We used other approaches to determine whether the genes identified in our study had been previously associated with psychiatric phenotypes: a literature search in PubMed (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/) and querying of the NCBI Gene database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene) to obtain information on the encoded proteins and their expression.
To identify the potential causal effect of candidate marker, the expression and splicing of quantitative trait locus (eQTL and sQTL, respectively) of significant SNPs were assessed by the GTEx v8 database (https://gtexportal.org/home/) and PsychENCODE (http://www.psychencode.org/). Significant markers rsIDs and genes of interest identified in the GWAS were submitted to the two selected databases. Description of the database is included in the Supplementary methods section.
Polygenic risk score (PRS)
The PRSs of BD and MDD in both the early- and late-onset PPD cohorts were calculated using PRSice (v 2.3.3) [Reference Choi and O’Reilly48] with the summary statistics from the published GWAS related on BD [Reference Stahl, Breen, Forstner, McQuillin, Ripke and Trubetskoy49] and MDD [Reference Howard, Adams, Clarke, Hafferty, Gibson and Shirali29] freely available online on the website from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (PGC; https://www.med.unc.edu/pgc/download-results/). PRS was calculated using 14 p-value thresholds (1, 0.5, 0.4, 0.3, 0.2, 0.1, 0.05, 0.01, 0.001, 10e−4, 10e−5, 10e−4, 10e−6, 10e−7, 10e−8) and we chose the best-fit threshold in general linear regression for each GWAS. Clumping was performed to remove the SNPs in linkage disequilibrium by including the 503 European samples from 1,000 genome projects as reference [50]. General linear regression models were used to determine the relationships between PPD status and each PRS, adjusted on age, and the top 10 principal components that indicate population structure were calculated using Plink. PRS were normalized using R to have a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1, in order to standardize the effect-size estimates. Empirical p-value was obtained through permutation of 10,000 times in PRSice. The statistical analyses were performed using R 4.0.5, and the plot was generated using the “Seaborn” module in Python 3.
Ethics, consent, and permissions
The authors assert that all procedures contributing to this work comply with the ethical standards of the relevant national and institutional committees on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008. All procedures involving human subjects were approved by the French Ethics Committee (Ile de France I) in March 2011 (reference numbers: AOM10056, NI10018, IGEDEPP, ID-RCB 2010-AO1315-34) and by Data Protection and Freedom of Information Commissions.
Results
Sample description
Among the 1,661 women who were included in our analyses, 234 (14.1%) had an early-onset PPD and 223 (13.4%) had a late-onset PPD. The controls were 1,204 (72.5%) without PPD.
The sociodemographic characteristics of the sample (N = 1,661) are described in Table 1. Participants had an average age of 32.7 years old, with 4.2% of women in our sample being less than 26, and 4.9% more than 39 years old. Women were mostly married or living common-law (97.3%), had a high level of education (93.4% reported at least a high school level), and most had a professional activity (93.9%).
Sociodemographic characteristics among IGEDEPP cohort respondents included in GWAS (N = 1661)
Main genetic association results
Early-onset PPD
We performed a GWAS on the early-onset PPD status (Figures 1 and S4(A)). Of note, the QQ-plots in Figure S4 show a slight inflation of the test statistics, which is not uncommon when using GRM, and is not observed when the analysis is carried out under a standard additive model (Figure S5).
Associations with early-onset PPD. Manhattan plot of association with early-onset PPD (A). The red and blue lines corresponding to significant (5 × 10−8) and suggestive (1 × 10−5) threshold, respectively. Zoom plot for chromosome 2 (B) and for chromosome 14 (C). For Zoom plot, blue line corresponds to significant threshold (5 × 10−8). Best markers with data linkage disequilibrium (LD) data were indicated in blue, markers not present in 1000G database are presented in white. Variation of red correspond to the LD. Size of the point for each marker correspond to the minor allele frequency. Known genes are presented below the plot as line, indicating the location and size, with intronic and exonic part, of each gene.
The lead associated markers are presented in Table 2, section A. Using GRM, we found two significant markers associated with early-onset PPD, rs6436132 on chromosome 2 (2q35) (P = 1.3 × 10–8) and rs184644645 on chromosome 14 (14q24.1) (p-value = 3.9 × 10–8). The selected genetic model for these two markers was recessive. The sensitivity analysis, where 8 possible outliers are removed, gives similar results: the p-values of rs6436132 and rs184644645 were 4.7 × 10–8 and 2.3 × 10–8, respectively (Figure S6).
Characteristics of the loci associated with the genotyping model and the best selected model (A) for early-onset PPD, (B) for late-onset PPD imputed and genotyped markers (B and C)
a Position on GRCH37.p13.
b The nearest genes around the variant according to dbSNP.
c Risk/protective allele in our sample.
d Non-significant marker with GRM, but selected for genotyping by CNG.
Under the recessive model, the rs6436132 marker has an OR of 3.34 (95% CI: [2.20–5.07]; p-value = 2.8 × 10–9), homozygous for TT, and was localized in an intronic variant of the PTPRN genes. Frequency of the T allele in our cohort was 0.33 for cases and 0.26 for controls. Two other genes (RESP18 and DNAJB2) were present in the linkage disequilibrium region (r 2 > 0.6).
The rs184644645 marker has an OR of 4.88 (95% CI: [2.70–8.82]; p-value = 9.2 × 10–9) and homozygous for TATG insertion. It is an intronic variant of the RAD51B gene. Frequency of the TATG insertion in our cohort was 0.25 for cases and 0.17 for controls. No other gene was present in this region. A new genome-wide analysis using rs6436132 as a covariate did not yield a genome-wide significant marker (data not shown).
We note the effect size of these SNPs (consistent with our power study, Supplementary data), which explains 2.2% and 2.0% of the trait variance.
Late-onset PPD
Results of the GWAS for late-onset PPD are displayed in Figures 2 and S4(B). We found five significant markers on chromosome 20 (20q12) presented in Table 2, section B. For these markers, the selected genetic model was additive. In the GWAS, these markers were imputed; to validate imputation, two of these significant markers in this region were genotyped. The results for imputed and genotyped data were consistent (Table 2, section C and Table S1). The two markers (rs6028723 and rsrs6129447) are significantly associated with late-onset PPD, respectively, with an OR of 1.81 (95% CI: [1.46–2.41]; p-value = 5.7 × 10–8) and 1.79 (95% CI: [1.44–2.22]; p-value = 1.6 × 10–7) for genotyped data. Only the long intergenic Non-Protein Coding RNA 1370 (LINC01370) is mapped in this region. A new genome-wide analysis using rs6028721 as a covariate yielded no genome-wide significant marker (data not shown). In the sensitivity analysis, where 8 possible outliers are removed, these SNPs do not reach statistical significance: the p-values range from 6 × 10–8 to 1.4 × 10–7 (Figure S7). The percentage of explained variance of this locus was estimated to be 2.2.
Associations with late-onset PPD. Manhattan plot of association with early-onset PPD (A). The red and blue line corresponding to significant (5 × 10−8) and suggestive (1 × 10−5) threshold, respectively. Zoom plot for chromosome 20 (B). For Zoom plot, blue line corresponds to significant threshold (5 × 10−8). Best markers with data linkage disequilibrium (LD) data were indicated in blue, markers not present in 1000G database are presented in white. Variation of red correspond to the LD. Size of the point for each marker correspond to the minor allele frequency. Known genes are presented below the plot as line, indicating the location and size, with intronic and exonic part, of each gene.
Post-GWAS analysis
Early-onset PPD
The markers present on the GSA array mapped to 17,766 protein-coding genes. MAGMA Gene-Set analysis performed by FUMA did not identify any curated gene sets or GO terms significantly associated with early-onset PPD. In contrast, tissue expression analysis shows that genes differentially expressed in the uterus are significantly enriched with early-onset PPD (p-value = 7.4 × 10–3), but no brain tissue was identified (Figure 3A).
FUMA principal results for tissue expression. Tissue expression results on 53 specific tissue types by GTEx, with significantly enriched. Differentially expressed gene sets (p-valuecorrected < 0.05) highlighted in red (FUMA) (A). Heatmap of expression of genes present in LD region associated with early-onset PPD (B). The expression level of the genes is between 0 (blue) and 5.67 (red).
For the significantly associated regions, six genes were initially identified. Among these genes, the two genes present on chromosome 2 are preferentially and more strongly expressed in different brain cell tissues (PTPRN and RESP18) (Figure 3B). Genes located in chromosome 14 seem to be more ubiquitous.
Annotation of the chromatin performed by FUMA suggested no specific region of regulation as an enhancer for the 2q35 region, and chromatin state for the region 14q24.1 suggested the presence of enhancers and quiescent markers (Figure S8).
We also assessed whether genetic variants significantly associated with early-onset PPD exert their effects through the regulation of gene expression and splicing. Variant rs6436132 associated with early-onset PPD affects splicing and expression of PTPRN: sQTL and eQTL in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, p = 1.8 × 10–25 and 1.3 × 10–9, respectively, according to the PsyENCODE database (Table 3). Other nearby genes, including RESP18 and STK16) were also found to be regulated by rs6436132, in several cerebral tissues (Table 3). Interestingly, using the PsychENCODE database, the search for sQTLs and eQTLs of the PTPRN gene identifies rs6436132 as the leading SNP with the most significant effect on expression among 120 significant results, and splicing among 28 significant results with a threshold 5 × 10–8 (data not shown).
Significant QTL identified in PsychENCODE and GTEx database for the rs6436132 marker
Chr, Chromosome; NES, normalized effect size (− underexpression, + overexpression).
No QTL was identified for the rs184644645 on chromosome 14.
Late-onset PPD
In contrast to the analysis of the early-onset PPD phenotype, MAGMA Gene-Set Analysis shows enrichment for genes associated with the regulation of cell adhesion molecule production (p-value corrected = 0.033) for late-onset PPD. However, the other analyses provided by FUMA do not show any significant results in terms of a difference in the level of expression both for the whole GWAS analyses and in the case of the precise analysis of the chromosome 20 region. The chromatin study, however, shows several markers associated with enhancers and a quiescent region of several genes (Figure S9).
None QTL was identified for the associated markers in chromosome 20.
Polygenic risk score
PRS derived from both MDD GWAS and BD GWAS could discriminate early-onset PPD cases from controls, the variance explained by MDD had a larger effect size compared to that of BD (effect size = 0.32, empirical p-value <0.001 based on MDD GWAS and effect size = 0.22, empirical p-value = 0.033 based on BD GWAS). Only PRS from MDD GWAS could discriminate late-onset PPD cases from controls (effect size = 0.21, empirical p-value = 0.039) (Table S2 and Figure S10).
Discussion
In this study, we performed two GWAS for early- and late-onset PPD separately. We distinguished these two phenotypes according to the timing of onset: 234 cases with early-onset PPD, 223 cases with late-onset PPD and 1,204 controls without a depression history. We highlighted two candidate loci for early-onset PPD and one region of interest for late-onset PPD. These SNP are not reported as significant in a recent meta-analysis on PPD [Reference Guintivano, Byrne, Kiewa, Yao, Bauer and Aberg31], although the direction of effect is consistent with our findings. We also identified rs6436132 in chromosome 2 as a strong sQTL and eQTL potentially regulating the expression of PTPRN in the brain, and found an enrichment of uterus tissue in the early expression of PPD genes.
This first GWAS result reinforces the disputed idea that there is a distinction between these two phenotypes of PPD [Reference Batt, Duffy, Novick, Metcalf and Epperson51]. As it currently stands, some epidemiological, clinical and biological data support this point. Both GWAS on perinatal depression (including pregnancy and PPD until 6 month after delivery) and a meta-analysis of GWAS for PPD in the first year after delivery (thus mixing early- and late-onset PPD) failed to identify any specific genetic variants [Reference Kiewa, Meltzer‐Brody, Milgrom, Guintivano, Hickie and Whiteman30,Reference Guintivano, Byrne, Kiewa, Yao, Bauer and Aberg31]. In addition, several previous candidate gene studies found different associations according to the phenotype: early or late-onset PPD [Reference Elwood, Murray, Bell, Sinclair, Kernohan and Stockdale20–Reference Figueiredo, Parada, de Araujo, Silva and Del-Ben23]. For instance, several studies have been performed on the rs6265 polymorphism of BDNF, a gene encoding the brain-derived neurotrophic factor involved in cerebral neuroplasticity and the regulation of the hypothalamic–pituitary axis. An association between this polymorphism and PPD at 6–8 weeks was demonstrated, but was not found with late-onset PPD (evaluated at 3 and 6 months) [Reference Comasco, Sylvén, Papadopoulos, Oreland, Sundström-Poromaa and Skalkidou52–Reference Alvim-Soares, Miranda, Campos, Figueira, Romano-Silva and Correa54]. Similarly, Tan et al. looked at the rs174575 polymorphism of the ESR2 gene, encoding the estrogen receptor, and found an association with early PPD at 6 weeks, but no association with late-onset PPD at 6 months [Reference Tan, Lim, Chua, Tan, Lee and Chen55]. This result may implicate hormonal changes in the immediate postpartum period in the pathophysiology of early-onset PPD [Reference Schiller, Meltzer-Brody and Rubinow56].
Our GWAS reveals that early-onset PPD is significantly associated with two markers, on chromosome 2 (rs6436132) and chromosome 14 (rs184644645), respectively.
The rs6436132 marker lies in an intronic variant of the PTPRN gene, encoding the protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor-N, an autoantigen known to be signaling molecules that regulates a variety of cellular processes predominantly expressed in the brain, without a specific cerebral area. Interestingly, three other tyrosine phosphatase protein receptor genes (PRPRR, PTPRD, and PTPRS), were found to be significantly associated with depressive disorder [Reference Edwards, Galletly, Semmler-Booth and Dekker57,Reference Muglia, Tozzi, Galwey, Francks, Upmanyu and Kong58].
Eleven other genes in chromosome 2 were in the linkage disequilibrium in this region. The RESP18 gene encodes for Regulated Endocrine Specific Protein 18, a protein sensitive to glucocorticoids in the corticotropic secretion pathway [Reference Bloomquist, Darlington, Mueller, Mains and Eipper59]. The “stress axis” is known to be involved in the pathophysiology of depression, in particular in PPD, with sudden changes in the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal and hormonal axes during early postpartum [Reference Seth, Lewis and Galbally60]. The expression of RESP18 is mainly in the brain and particularly in the basal ganglia (nucleus accumbens, caudate, and putamen). Basal ganglia dysfunction was found in depression, particularly when psychomotor symptoms were present [Reference Pizzagalli, Holmes, Dillon, Goetz, Birk and Bogdan61,Reference Van Cauwenberge, Bouckaert, Vansteelandt, Adamson, De Winter and Sienaert62]. The putamen seems to be specifically involved in PPD [Reference Sasaki, Liotta, Luckey, Margioris, Suda and Krieger63,Reference Duan, Cosgrove and Deligiannidis64]. Indeed, monamine oxidase A (MAO-A) total distribution volume was significantly elevated in the dorsal putamen during the early postpartum period. This may be a marker of a monoamine-lowering process that contributes to the change in mood [Reference Sacher, Wilson, Houle, Rusjan, Hassan and Bloomfield65]. Furthermore, RESP18 is regulated by physiological factors such as blood sugar and dopaminergic drugs, but its functions remain unclear [Reference Liang, Yang, Bian, Liu, Hong and Wang66].
The second SNP associated with early-onset-PPD is rs184644645, an intronic variant of the RAD51B gene located on chromosome 14. It encodes a protein of the RAD51 family, conserved during evolution because it is essential for DNA repair. Its expression is ubiquitous. Polymorphisms of homologous recombination RAD51 were found to be associated with cancer and rheumatoid arthritis [Reference Figueroa, Garcia-Closas, Humphreys, Platte, Hopper and Southey67,Reference Zhi, Yao, Ma, Zhang, Chen and Li68], but never before in mood disorders.
The GWAS for late-onset PPD revealed five SNPs significantly associated with this phenotype in one region on chromosome 20. Two of them were confirmed by TaqMan genotyping. They were found in the Long Intergenic Non-Protein Coding RNA 1370 (LINC01370). No other genes or microRNAs were present in this region.
All of the risk variants reported for early-onset PPD or late-onset PPD found with our GWAS were located in non-exonic regions, suggesting that these genetic variations confer risk by modulating gene expression or splicing. Our analyses on QTLs showed that rs6436132 located on intron 18 of PTPRN is both: the SNP most associated with the early-onset PPD phenotype and a QTL that very significantly modifies the expression and splicing of the PTPRN gene in different brain tissues. This suggests that PTPRN might be a candidate causal gene in early-onset PPD.
Tissue expression analysis showed that genes differentially expressed in the uterus were significantly enriched and could confer risk specific to early-onset PPD. Interestingly, Kiewa et al. have demonstrated the potential role of genes expressed in the ovaries in perinatal depression [Reference Kiewa, Meltzer‐Brody, Milgrom, Guintivano, Hickie and Whiteman30]. Genes expressed in reproductive tissues, therefore, appear to have a specific implication in perinatal depression, particularly with the early-onset form, because this result is not found in MDD or late-onset PPD [Reference Howard, Adams, Clarke, Hafferty, Gibson and Shirali29]. This further reinforces the hormonal pathophysiological hypotheses and a specific genetic vulnerability for early-onset PPD [Reference Schiller, Meltzer-Brody and Rubinow56,Reference Mehta, Rex-Haffner, Sondergaard, Pinborg, Binder and Frokjaer69].
PRS analysis revealed a genetic overlap between PPD (both early and late-onset) and MDD. Although the question remains debated by some authors, this incomplete overlap gives more weight to the argument for a distinction between MDD and PPD [Reference Batt, Duffy, Novick, Metcalf and Epperson51,Reference O’Brien, Sethi, Gudbrandsen, Lennuyeux-Comnene, Murphy and Craig70]. We also found a genetic overlap with BD, though different than that with MDD. Interestingly, only early-onset PPD overlaps with BD; a finding which is consistent with our previous results that 12.2% of women with BD begin their disorder with PPD [Reference Tebeka, Le Strat and Dubertret71,Reference Tebeka, Godin, Mazer, Bellivier, Courtet and Etain72]. The differences between early and late-onset PPD displayed in the present study match those found in the literature. Byrne et al. and Pouget et al. also found a genetic overlap between early-onset PPD and BD [Reference Byrne, Carrillo-Roa, Penninx, Sallis, Viktorin and Chapman33,Reference Pouget, Taylor, Dennis, Grigoriadis, Oberlander and Frey35]. These two studies focused on samples of women who developed symptoms early in postpartum: “around the time of delivery” and before the end of the first 3 months postpartum (including 80% before the first month postpartum), respectively. Conversely, Rantalainen et al. and Bauer et al., who considered women with later manifestations (within the first 6 months postpartum and within 1 year postpartum, respectively), did not show any genetic overlap between PPD and BD [Reference Bauer, Liu, Byrne, Sullivan, Wray and Agerbo34,Reference Rantalainen, Binder, Lahti-Pulkkinen, Czamara, Laivuori and Villa36]. This may be explained by more rapid mood changes postpartum in women with BD [Reference Munk-Olsen, Laursen, Meltzer-Brody, Mortensen and Jones73].
Our study has several strengths. First, to our knowledge, this is the first GWAS to date on PPD, based on the largest multicenter prospective study of postpartum women. Second, our quality control showed a homogeneity of our cases and controls, suggesting that we can, with reasonable confidence, rule out a significant bias in our results caused by the residual genetic substructure. Third, the cases and controls were carefully selected: the diagnosis of PPD was made prospectively by a trained clinician and based on international DSM-5 criteria [74]. The date of depression onset was collected at 8 weeks for early-onset PPD, and at 1 year for late-onset PPD. Regarding the controls, in the IGEDEPP study, we favored “super controls”: women without any personal lifetime history of depression (evaluated using the DIGS while at the maternity hospital for the birth, then at 8 weeks, and 1 year postpartum, according to DSM-5 criteria). By using the most distinct phenotypes, we were able to highlight genetic differences and potentially explain previous discrepancies. Moreover, our population has particularly favorable sociodemographic characteristics: more than 90% of women were in a relationship, with a high level of education, and employed; these elements reduce the impact of a deleterious environment in revealing genetic vulnerabilities. Finally, our genetic analysis is based on the imputation of certain markers, the validity of this imputation was confirmed by genotyping, which reinforces the reliability of our data.
Our findings should be considered with certain limitations. First, our study was limited to women of European ancestry (self-reported) and is not representative of the French population as a whole, which limits the generalisability of our results to other populations. Second, our sample has a limited number of subjects for a GWAS. It has been shown that for multifactorial diseases, where several SNPs may be involved, each with a small effect, large sample sizes of the order of several thousand are needed to obtain sufficient statistical power [Reference Bodmer and Bonilla75,Reference Altshuler and Daly76]. Replication in an independent and larger sample is required and, for late-onset PPD, the significant results are not preserved in a sensitivity analysis. Finally, we do not have a functional analysis that could shed light on our results.
In summary, we report results from the first GWAS specifically for PPD. We found different markers for early- and late-onset PPD, identifying different markers that involve genes for each phenotype. We found two markers associated with early-onset PPD on chromosome 2 (PTPRN gene) and chromosome 14 (RAD51B gene), respectively, and five markers in one region on chromosome 20 associated with late-onset PPD. The distinction between early and late-onset PPD is reinforced by our PRS analyses: early-onset PPD has an extensive genetic overlap with both MDD and BD, while late-onset PPD only overlaps with MDD. Finally, we found an enrichment of uterus tissue in expression of early-onset PPD genes.
To conclude, these results provide an important step toward a better understanding of genetic factors of PPD and provide arguments for a distinction between early and late-onset phenotypes.
Abbreviations
- BD
-
bipolar disorder
- CI
-
confidence interval
- FUMA
-
Functional Mapping and Annotation of Genome-Wide Association Studies
- GRM
-
general regression model
- GTEx
-
genotype-tissue expression
- GWAS
-
genome-wide association study
- IGEDEPP
-
interaction of gene and environment of depression during postpartum
- QTL
-
quantitative trait locus
- OR
-
odd ratio
- PPD
-
postpartum depression
- PRS
-
polygenic risk score
- SNP
-
single nucleotide polymorphism
Supplementary material
The supplementary material for this article can be found at http://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.26.
Data availability statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from AP-HP. Restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for this study. Data are available from the authors with the permission of AP-HP.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank all the clinicians involved in this study, especially Emmanuelle Bertin, Cecile Bourneuf, Jeanne Colombe, Laura Couppa, Fanny Georges, Julie Guiot Madhavi, Celine Hebbache, Marie Le Bars, Cindy Parent, and Alix de Premorel who included and followed the participants. We would also like to thank the entire team of Bichat’s Clinical Research and Innovation Department and in particular, Sonia Makhlouf (project director), Samira Laribi (Bioinformatician manager), and Yohan Maurer (Clinical Research Attached). We also thank the team of the CNRGH high-throughput genotyping team for data production and in particular, Jeanne-Antide Perrier and Céline Derbois for the TaqMan validation and Delphine Daian for the quality control performed on all the data.
We thank all the women who participated in the study.
Author contribution
S.T. drafted the initial manuscript and approved the final manuscript as submitted. E.G. and J.M. carried out the initial analyses, revised the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted. Q.H. computed analyses and approved the final manuscript as submitted. A.B. and J.F.D. generated data, revised the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted. C. Jamet revised the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted.
N Ramoz and C. Dubertret designed analyses, revised the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted.
Financial support
The study was funded by a grant from the Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique – PHRC 2010 (French Ministry of Health). The study was sponsored by Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (Délégation à la Recherche Clinique et à l’Innovation).
Competing interest
The authors have no competing interests to decalre.
Open access
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.