Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T11:02:49.165Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bainite transformation affected by predeformation and stress in G55SiMoV steel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2014

Lei Tian
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Ji'nan 250061, China
Qing Ao
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Ji'nan 250061, China
Shengli Li*
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Ji'nan 250061, China
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: lishengli@sdu.edu.cn

Abstract

The influence of predeformation and stress on the isothermal bainite transformation has been investigated in G55SiMoV steel via microstructure observation and kinetic analysis. It was found that the bainite transformation became faster and at the end of isothermal holding the bainite fraction increased under the applied stress condition. When the stress increased to 150 MPa, the bainite distribution became to be nonrandom in G55SiMoV steel. Different deformation conditions, in which both promotion and inhibition occurred in the same steel, were created. The promoting and inhibiting factors affected bainite transformation comprehensively. 20% deformation could promote the bainite transformation when it deformed at 900 °C, but prevent bainite transformation when it deformed at 750 °C. Increase of ferrite nucleation rate caused by distortion and dislocation, would suppress the growth of bainite carbides and make most carbides without full growth be finer and shorter.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 
Figure 0

TABLE I. Chemical compositions of the G55SiMoV (wt%).

Figure 1

FIG. 1. Schematic illustration of thermal simulation processes: (a) deformation; (b) stress.

Figure 2

FIG. 2. Dilation curves of samples austempered at 290 °C after deformation at 900 °C with different deformation reductions.

Figure 3

FIG. 3. Dilation curves of samples austempered at 290 °C after deformation at 750 °C with different deformation reductions.

Figure 4

FIG. 4. Microstructure of samples with different deformation reductions (observed by OM): (a) 0%, (b) 10% (c) 20%, and (d) 30%.

Figure 5

FIG. 5. Bainite size distribution of samples with different deformation reductions: (a) 0%, (b) 10%, (c) 20%, and (d) 30%.

Figure 6

TABLE II. Microstructure parameters affected by deformation reduction.

Figure 7

FIG. 6. Microstructure of samples with and without deformation (observed by TEM): (a) undeformed, (b) undeformed, (c) 10%, and (d) 30%.

Figure 8

FIG. 7. Dilation curves of samples with 30% deformation reduction austempered at 290 °C deformed at different temperatures.

Figure 9

FIG. 8. Dilation curves of samples with 10% deformation austempered at 275 °C deformed at different temperatures.

Figure 10

FIG. 9. Dilation curves of samples austempered at 275 °C with different deformation reductions.

Figure 11

FIG. 10. Dilation curves of samples austempered at 275 °C applying different stresses.

Figure 12

FIG. 11. Dilation curves of samples austempered at 290 °C applying different stresses.

Figure 13

FIG. 12. Microstructures of samples applying different stresses: (a) 0 MPa, (b) 20 MPa, (c) 100 MPa, and (d) 150 MPa.