Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T23:37:46.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The structure and thermochemistry of K2CO3–MgCO3 glass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 September 2019

Martin C. Wilding*
Affiliation:
Materials and Engineering Research Institute, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield S1 1WB, U.K.; and Department of Geosciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11794, USA
Brian L. Phillips
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11794, USA
Mark Wilson
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry Laboratory, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QZ, U.K.
Geetu Sharma
Affiliation:
Peter A. Rock Thermochemistry Laboratory, University of California, Davis, California 95616, USA
Alexandra Navrotsky
Affiliation:
Peter A. Rock Thermochemistry Laboratory, University of California, Davis, California 95616, USA
Paul A. Bingham
Affiliation:
Materials and Engineering Research Institute, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield S1 1WB, U.K.
Richard Brooker
Affiliation:
School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1RJ, U.K.
John B. Parise
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11794, USA
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: martin.wilding@manchester.ac.uk

Abstract

Carbonate glasses can be formed routinely in the system K2CO3–MgCO3. The enthalpy of formation for one such 0.55K2CO3–0.45MgCO3 glass was determined at 298 K to be 115.00 ± 1.21 kJ/mol by drop solution calorimetry in molten sodium molybdate (3Na2O·MoO3) at 975 K. The corresponding heat of formation from oxides at 298 K was −261.12 ± 3.02 kJ/mol. This ternary glass is shown to be slightly metastable with respect to binary crystalline components (K2CO3 and MgCO3) and may be further stabilized by entropy terms arising from cation disorder and carbonate group distortions. This high degree of disorder is confirmed by 13C MAS NMR measurement of the average chemical shift tensor values, which show asymmetry of the carbonate anion to be significantly larger than previously reported values. Molecular dynamics simulations show that the structure of this carbonate glass reflects the strong interaction between the oxygen atoms in distorted carbonate anions and potassium cations.

Information

Type
Invited Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019 
Figure 0

Figure 1: (a) FTIR absorbance spectra taken using micro-ATR. The 12C sample has two peaks assigned to ν1 symmetric stretching at 1049 and 1088 cm−1 and two peaks assigned to ν2 out-of-plane bending at 806 and 870 cm−1. Only one ν4 in-plane bend peak is seen at 691 cm−1, but the detector response may have cut off a second peak at a lower wavenumber. The ν3 asymmetric stretch is more complex, but can be fitted with 4 peaks representing two doublets. ν3 are approximately at 1340, 1377, 1395, and 1431 cm−1. In the upper spectra, the approximate magnitude of the isotopic shift related to 13C is indicated by vertical ticks. The 13C peaks are marked with an asterisk. (b) The glasses do not change their water content in the first 24 h. However, it should be noted that they eventually turn to a white powder within 3–4 weeks. The peak at 3200 cm−1 is assumed to represent O–H stretching, but has a lower frequency than observed in silicate glasses.

Figure 1

TABLE I: Enthalpy of drop solution of 0.55K2CO3–0.45MgCO3 glass at 975 K.

Figure 2

Figure 2: 13C MAS-NMR spectra of 13C-labeled 0.55K2CO3·0.45MgCO3 glass acquired at 100.56 MHz (9.4 T) and spinning rates of (a) 10.3 kHz and (b and c) 1.5 kHz. Spectra in (a and b) were taken by direct 13C excitation (DE) with 4.5 μs pulses separated by a 30-s relaxation delay for (a) 800 and (b) 280 acquisitions, and in (c) by standard 1H → 13C cross-polarization (CP) with a 2-ms contact time and 2-s relaxation delay, for 800 scans. Inset shows center bands at an expanded scale.

Figure 3

Figure 3: Energy dispersive (collected at sector 16 APS) for 55% K2CO3–45% MgCO3 glass compared with the summed partial contributions for the simulated liquids of the same composition (top); the lower panel shows the individual partial contributions with X-ray weighting (Ashcroft–Langreth) fo K–K, K–O, and O–O which dominate the X-ray scattering pattern. There is a considerable mismatch between the experiment and simulation. This could result from the difference between the fully relaxed liquid and the vitreous form of this carbonate.

Figure 4

Figure 4: Molecular dynamics snapshots of the 55% K2CO3–45% MgCO3 liquid at 1800 K showing the distribution of the carbonate anions. C–O bonds are shown in black (a) with some longer C–O bond lengths (shown in gray) and formation of the CO3+1 configuration apparent even at ambient pressure. This is compared with the rhombohedral crystal structure of K2Mg(CO3)2 [41] (b) with the unit cell illustrated; the rigid, triangular carbonate anions form planes perpendicular to the c-axis. In the lower figure, potassium and magnesium atoms are also shown (c); the structure is dominated by the strong interaction between the large, blue potassium cations and the distorted carbonate. The coordinate polyhedra of potassium and magnesium are shown for the ambient pressure crystal structure.

Figure 5

Figure 5: Six of the partial radial distribution functions to illustrate the response of the K2CO3–MgCO3 liquids to pressure. The curves are generated by the simulations at six different densities (pressures) with the lowest densities the topmost curves. The emergence of the second C–O length scale seen at high pressure in the C–O (a) and C–C (b) partial contributions. The changes in K–K (c), K–O (d) and O–O (e) partial contribution represent the changes in the potassium sub-density and strong interaction between the oxygen atoms in the carbonate anion and the potassium cations. The Mg–O partial contribution (f) changes little with pressure.

Supplementary material: Image

Wilding et al. supplementary material

Wilding et al. supplementary material 1

Download Wilding et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 933.3 KB
Supplementary material: File

Wilding et al. supplementary material

Wilding et al. supplementary material 2

Download Wilding et al. supplementary material(File)
File 2.8 MB
Supplementary material: Image

Wilding et al. supplementary material

Wilding et al. supplementary material 3

Download Wilding et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 917.5 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Wilding et al. supplementary material

Wilding et al. supplementary material 4

Download Wilding et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 926.4 KB