Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T10:12:39.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Geochemistry of the 1100 Ma intrusive rocks from the Ahlmannryggen region, Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2014

Teal R. Riley*
Affiliation:
British Antarctic Survey, NERC, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 OET, UK
Ian L. Millar
Affiliation:
NERC Isotope Geosciences Laboratory, Kingsley Dunham Centre, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The recognition of a Mesoproterozoic large igneous province (LIP) across large parts of southern Africa has been strengthened by recent geochronology, geochemistry and petrology. The c. 1100 Ma Umkondo province has been recognized across parts of Botswana, Zimbabwe, South Africa and Mozambique where tholeiitic sills, dykes and rare lava flows have been correlated into a single magmatic province emplaced in the interval 1108–1112 Ma. The extension of the province into the Dronning Maud Land region of Antarctica has been suggested by several workers, but detailed analyses of geochemistry and petrogenesis are lacking, as are comparative studies. This study investigates 25 dykes and sills of the Borgmassivet intrusions which include several of the major diorite sills of the province, up to 300 m in thickness. The dykes and sills are also considered to be c. 1100 Ma and they were emplaced, in part, synchronously with the Ritscherflya Supergroup sedimentary sequence. The Borgmassivet intrusions are characterized by geochemical signatures that suggest the magmas were either extensively contaminated by continental crust or derived from an enriched lithospheric mantle source, where the enrichment was related to earlier subduction. The limited geochemical range of the Borgmassivet and Umkondo intrusions are probably not consistent with significant levels of crustal contamination. Furthermore, the trace element ratios indicate a source in the sub-lithospheric mantle, followed by gabbroic fractionation and interaction with lithospheric wall rocks.

Information

Type
Earth Sciences
Copyright
Copyright © Antarctic Science Ltd 2014 
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Location map of rock outcrops in western Dronning Maud Land (Antarctica) from Vestfjella to H.U. Svedrupfjella. The inset is a pre-break-up Gondwana reconstruction of Africa and Antarctica showing the extent of the Kaapvaal-Grunehogna Craton and the outcrop of Early–Middle Jurassic Karoo igneous rocks.

Figure 1

Table I Whole rock analyses of dolerite dykes/diorite sills from Ahlmannryggen, Dronning Maud Land.

Figure 2

Fig. 2 Total alkali vs SiO2 diagram (wt%) for the Ahlmannryggen dykes and Borgmassivet intrusions. The samples are basalt or basaltic andesite and are classified as quartz tholeiites based on their CIPW norms, with the exception of two samples which are olivine tholeiites (Z.1815.1 and Z.1835.1).

Figure 3

Fig. 3 Variations in Zr, TiO2, Cr, Fe2O3(T), Ni, Y, Sr and Rb vs MgO for the Ahlmannryggen dykes and Borgmassivet intrusions. Major oxides in wt% and trace elements in ppm.

Figure 4

Table I Continued.

Figure 5

Fig. 4 Variation in Zr vs TiO2 for Ahlmannryggen dykes and Borgmassivet intrusions shown in comparison to MPWA and MPWB sills (Bullen et al. 2012), Karoo-age dykes from the Ahlmannryggen (Dronning Maud Land (DML) groups 3–4; Riley et al. 2005), Karoo low Ti-Zr (LTZ) and high Ti-Zr (HTZ) basalts (Sweeney et al. 1994) and average Ferrar (Antonini et al. 1999).

Figure 6

Fig. 5 Chondrite normalized (Nakamura 1974) rare earth element (REE) diagrams for Ahlmannryggen dykes and Borgmassivet intrusions in comparison to the MPWA sills (Bullen et al. 2012).

Figure 7

Fig. 6 Primitive mantle normalized incompatible element diagrams for the Ahlmannryggen dykes and Borgmassivet intrusions in comparison to the MPWA sills (Bullen et al. 2012). Normalizing values are taken from Sun & McDonough (1989).

Figure 8

Fig. 7 Variations in Th/Yb vs Nb/Yb showing the composition of basic dykes from the Ahlmannryggen dykes and Borgmassivet intrusions relative to the MORB-OIB array (Pearce & Peate 1995). With comparisons to the Karoo-Dronning Maud Land (DML) fields from the Ahlmannryggen (Riley et al. 2005), average Ferrar (Molzahn et al. 1996), MPWA and MPWB sills (Bullen et al. 2012) and average global subducting sediment (GLOSS; Plank & Langmuir 1998).

Figure 9

Fig. 8 Nb anomaly, Nb/Nb* (=NbN√(ThN x LaN)) vs87Sr/86Sr. The Nb anomaly can be used to test the role of sediment contamination in mantle-derived magmas. With comparisons to the Karoo-Dronning Maud Land (DML) group 2 and 3 fields (Riley et al. 2005), the MPWA sills (Bullen et al. 2012), the Ferrar field (Molzahn et al. 1996) and average global subducting sediment (GLOSS; Plank & Langmuir 1998). 87Sr/86Sr = 0.7173, Sr = 327 ppm, Nb/Nb* = 0.22.

Figure 10

Fig. 9 Ce/Y vs Zr/Nb plot for basic dykes/sills from the Ahlmannryggen and Borgmassivet intrusions. Non-modal equilibrium melting curves (Shaw 1970) for primitive mantle (solid line) and depleted mantle (dashed line) (compositions calculated from the average N-MORB composition given by Sun & McDonough 1989). Full details of the distribution coefficients are in Upton et al. (2005). OIB = ocean island basalt.