Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T10:34:08.746Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Anomalous scaling of passive scalar fluctuations in experiments of turbulent pipe flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2026

Huixin Li
Affiliation:
The State Key Laboratory of Nonlinear Mechanics, Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences , No. 15 Beisihuanxi Road, 100190, Beijing, PR China School of Engineering Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 1 Yanqihu East Road, 101408, Beijing, PR China
Duo Xu*
Affiliation:
The State Key Laboratory of Nonlinear Mechanics, Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences , No. 15 Beisihuanxi Road, 100190, Beijing, PR China School of Engineering Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 1 Yanqihu East Road, 101408, Beijing, PR China
Guowei He
Affiliation:
The State Key Laboratory of Nonlinear Mechanics, Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences , No. 15 Beisihuanxi Road, 100190, Beijing, PR China School of Engineering Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 1 Yanqihu East Road, 101408, Beijing, PR China
*
Corresponding author: Duo Xu, duo.xu@imech.ac.cn

Abstract

The anomalous scaling of passive scalar fluctuations is experimentally investigated in turbulent pipe flow with a Taylor-microscale Péclet number of $\mathcal{O}(10^5)$, where the turbulence is known to deviate from the homogeneous isotropic turbulence. The scalar structure functions and intermittency in the mixing are examined. The experimental results consolidate that the scaling exponents of scalar structure functions saturate at high-order even moments, evidenced previously in homogeneous isotropic turbulence with a Taylor-microscale Péclet number of $\mathcal{O}(10^3)$. The saturation scaling exponent decreases to approach unity as the Taylor-microscale Péclet number increases. This saturation scaling exponent is further corroborated by the fractal codimension of sharp scalar fronts.

Information

Type
JFM Papers
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Summary of the flow characteristic parameters: $\textit{Re}$ is bulk Reynolds number; $r/D$ is the radial position; $\textit{Re}_\lambda = u_{\textit{rms}} \lambda _u/\nu$ is the Taylor-microscale Reynolds number, where $u_{\textit{rms}}$ is the root-mean-square of the velocity, $\lambda _u$ the Taylor microscale of velocity fluctuation and $\nu$ the kinetic viscosity; $\eta _K$ is the Kolmogorov scale; $\textit{Pe}_{\! \lambda} =\textit{Re}_\lambda \textit{Sc}$ is the Taylor-microscale Péclet number.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Sketch of the general pipe set-up, where inner diameter $D = 40$ mm. The fluid in the pipe is driven by gravity and scalar is discharged by injection through small needle with a 2 mm inner diameter ($d$) at downstream positions $L_1-L_2 = 25D$. The scalar concentration field was measured by PLIF at $L_2 = 220d$ downstream from the needle.

Figure 2

Figure 2. (a) Plots of $|E_{zr}(k_z)|/(U_0^2D)$ versus $k_z \eta _K$ (dotted lines), $|E_{zz}(k_z)|/(U_0^2D)$ versus $k_z \eta _K$ (solid lines) and $|E_{rr}(k_z)|/(U_0^2D)$ versus $k_z \eta _K$ (dashed lines) for $\textit{Re} = 10\,000$ at $r/D = 0$ (top) and $r/D = 0.3$ (bottom). (b) Plots of $H_{zr}(k_z)$ versus $k_z \eta _K$ for $\textit{Re} = 10\,000$ and 20 000 at $r/D = 0$ (solid lines) and $r/D = 0.3$ (dashed lines). Note that $H_{zr}(k_z) \ll 1$ for all $k_z$.

Figure 3

Figure 3. (a) Probability density functions of the normalised streamwsie scalar derivative ($\partial _z \phi ^\prime$) and the normalised radial scalar derivative ($\partial _r \phi ^\prime$, dashed lines) for $\textit{Sc} \approx 2000$ and $\textit{Re} = 20\,000$ at $r/D = 0.0$ (filled symbols) and 0.3 (hollow symbols). The inset shows the quantity $ \gamma = |\mathrm{p.d.f.}(\beta )-\mathrm{p.d.f.}(-\beta )|/[\mathrm{p.d.f.}(\beta )+\mathrm{p.d.f.}(-\beta )]$, where $\beta = \partial _z \phi ^\prime /\langle (\partial _z \phi ^\prime )^2\rangle ^{1/2}$ or $\partial _r \phi ^\prime /\langle (\partial _r \phi ^\prime )^2\rangle ^{1/2}$. Smaller values of this quantity indicate smaller asymmetries. (b) The ratio, $\langle (\partial _r \phi ^\prime )^2 \rangle ^{1/2}/ \langle (\partial _z \phi ^\prime )^2 \rangle ^{1/2}$, versus $r/D$ for $\textit{Re} = 10\,000, 15\,000$ and 20 000.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Probability density functions of the normalised scalar increments $\kappa = S_1/\sigma _1$ at $\textit{Pe}_{\! \lambda} =156\,400$, where $\sigma _1$ is the standard deviation of $S_1$. From the outer to the inner p.d.f., $\Delta z/\eta _K = 1, 10, 100$ and $200$. The grey dashed line indicates a Gaussian distribution.

Figure 5

Figure 5. (a) Normalised scalar structure functions along streamwise direction (from $p = 2$ to 16) at $\textit{Pe}_{\! \lambda} =156\,400$. (b) Corresponding local slope of $p$th-order scalar structure functions. The grey region indicates the scale range for calculating the scaling exponents.

Figure 6

Figure 6. (a) Scalar structure functions $S_p$ ($p = 4, 8, 12, 16$, from bottom to top) versus $S_2$ at $\textit{Pe}_{\! \lambda} =156\,400$. The grey dashed lines indicate the selected extended self-similarity (ESS) range. (b) Corresponding local slope of $p$th-order structure functions in ESS.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Scaling exponents of the structure functions estimated by the log–log fitting (figure 5a), the mean of the local slope (figure 5b) and ESS (figure 6a) at $\textit{Pe}_{\! \lambda} = 156\,400$. The respective $95\,\%$ confidence intervals from the log–log fitting and the ESS fitting are taken as error bars. The standard deviation of the local slopes is taken as the error bars.

Figure 8

Figure 8. Integrands of scalar increment moments as functions of scalar increments at (a) $\Delta z/\eta _K = 15$ and (b) $\Delta z/\eta _K = 90$.

Figure 9

Figure 9. (a) Scaling exponent $\xi _p$ as a function of the moment order $p$ for three $\textit{Pe}_{\! \lambda}$ from this study and reference studies. Error bars represent the 95 % confidence intervals. The dashed line $\xi _p = p/3$ corresponds to the Kolmogorov–Obukhov–Corrsin phenomenology. The dotted line with an arrow indicates the approximate saturation. (b) Saturation scaling exponent $\xi _\infty$ colour-coded with the background velocity gradient along the pipe radius as a function of $\textit{Pe}_{\! \lambda}$. The inset shows $\xi _\infty (\textit{Pe}_{\! \lambda} )$ of the passive scalar mixing in homogeneous isotropic turbulence (HIT) from Moisy et al. (2001), Watanabe & Gotoh (2006), Iyer et al. (2018) and Buaria et al. (2021a), as well as the pipe flow in this study.

Figure 10

Figure 10. Probability density function of scalar increments at $r/D = 0$ for Re = 20 000 across the inertial range, multiplied by $(\Delta z)^{-\xi _\infty }$, where $-\xi _\infty$ is the saturation exponent (see figure 9a). The p.d.f. tails collapse, confirming saturation of exponents.

Figure 11

Figure 11. (a) Probability density function of the normalised scalar gradient, $\mathscr{R} \equiv \partial _r \phi ^\prime /(\phi ^\prime _{\textit{rms}}/\eta _K)$, where dotted lines denote $ |\mathscr{R}| = 0.2, 0.4$ and $0.6$, respectively. (b, c) Compensated plot of $\langle N\rangle$, the number of squares in dimension of $\Delta z$ containing the scalar fronts satisfying the threshold condition.

Figure 12

Figure 12. Sharp scalar fronts with $ |\mathscr{R}| = (a)\, 0.2$, (b) $0.4$ and (c) $0.6$ for a snapshot at $\textit{Re} = 20\,000$ and $\textit{Sc} = 2000$.