Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8rzl6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T14:35:58.524Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Role of d-serine in the beneficial effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in post-stroke patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2020

Masachika Niimi*
Affiliation:
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tokyo General Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
Yuko Fujita
Affiliation:
Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Chiba University Center for Forensic Mental Health, Chiba, Japan
Tamaki Ishima
Affiliation:
Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Chiba University Center for Forensic Mental Health, Chiba, Japan
Kenji Hashimoto
Affiliation:
Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Chiba University Center for Forensic Mental Health, Chiba, Japan
Nobuyuki Sasaki
Affiliation:
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Takatoshi Hara
Affiliation:
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Naoki Yamada
Affiliation:
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Masahiro Abo
Affiliation:
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
*
Author for correspondence: Masachika Niimi, Email: pomardon2010@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

Abnormalities in neurotransmission via N-methyl-d-aspartic acid receptor (NMDAR) play a role in the pathophysiology of neuropsychiatric disorders. The impact of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on NMDAR-related amino acids remains unknown. We aim to investigate the effects of rTMS on NMDAR-related amino acids in serum of post-stroke patients.

Methods:

Ninety-five consecutive post-stroke patients with upper limb hemiparesis were recruited. In 27 patients, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) score was 10 or higher. Twelve depressed patients underwent rehabilitation in combination with rTMS and 15 non-depressed patients underwent rehabilitation only without rTMS for 14 days. 1 Hz rTMS was applied to the primary motor area in the non-lesional hemisphere. BDI was conducted before and after treatment. Serum glutamine, glutamate, glycine, l-serine, and d-serine levels were measured before and after treatment.

Results:

There were no differences between depressed patients and non-depressed patients in clinical characteristics, levels of the five amino acids in serum, and the ratio of amino acids. However, in 27 depressed patients, there was a significant correlation between levels of glutamate in serum and BDI (ρ = 0.428, p = 0.026). BDI decreased significantly in depressed patients after treatment with or without rTMS. d-serine decreased in the rehabilitation with rTMS group, but increased in the rehabilitation without rTMS group. l-serine increased in the rehabilitation with rTMS group, but decreased in the rehabilitation without rTMS group.

Conclusion:

The results suggest that rTMS can modulate NMDAR-related amino acids in blood, producing beneficial effects.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© Scandinavian College of Neuropsychopharmacology 2020
Figure 0

Table 1. Comparison of clinical characteristics at baseline

Figure 1

Table 2. Levels of amino acids in serum and ratio of amino acids in subjects at baseline

Figure 2

Table 3. Comparison of clinical characteristics at baseline between rehabilitation with rTMS group and rehabilitation without rTMS group

Figure 3

Fig. 1. (A) There was no significant correlation between serum levels of glutamine and BDI in depressed patients (n = 27, ρ = −0.021, p = 0.919) and non-depressed patients (n = 68, ρ = −0.107, p = 0.387). (B) There was a significant positive correlation between serum levels of glutamate and BDI in depressed patients (ρ = 0.428, p = 0.026). There was no significant correlation between serum levels of glutamate and BDI in non-depressed patients (ρ = 0.092, p = 0.454). (C) There was no significant correlation between serum levels of glycine and BDI in depressed patients (ρ = 0.254, p = 0.202) and non-depressed patients (ρ = 0.013, p = 0.919). (D) There was no significant correlation between serum levels of l-serine and BDI in depressed patients (ρ = 0.090, p = 0.656) and non-depressed patients (ρ = 0.046, p = 0.711). (E) There was no significant correlation between serum levels of d-serine and BDI in depressed patients (ρ = −0.159, p = 0.427) and non-depressed patients (ρ = −0.040, p = 0.745).

Figure 4

Fig. 2. There was a significant decrease of BDI score in both rehabilitation with rTMS group and rehabilitation without rTMS group (group: F = 0.5, df = 1,25, p = 0.489, time: F = 6.2, df = 1,25, p = 0.020, interaction (group × time): F = 0.1, df = 1,25, p = 0.777).

Figure 5

Fig. 3. (A) Two-way repeated measures ANOVA of glutamine data showed no significant effects and group-and-time interaction (group: F = 1.1, df = 1,25, p = 0.306, time: F = 0.4, df = 1,25, p = 0.531, interaction (group × time): F = 4.1, df = 1,25, p = 0.055). (B) Two-way repeated measures ANOVA of glutamate data showed no significant effects and group-and-time interaction (group: F = 2.0, df = 1,25, p = 0.169, time: F = 0.4, df = 1,25, p = 0.520, interaction (group × time): F = 1.2, df = 1,25, p = 0.278). (C) Two-way repeated measures ANOVA of glycine data showed no significant effects and group-and-time interaction (group: F = 0.9, df = 1,25, p = 0.346, time: F = 0.4, df = 1,25, p = 0.479, interaction (group × time): F = 0.8, df = 1,25, p = 0.387). (D) Two-way repeated measures ANOVA of l-serine data showed no significant effects and group-and-time interaction (group: F = 0.1, df = 1,25, p = 0.738, time: F = 0.1, df = 1,25, p = 0.798, interaction (group × time): F = 0.8, df = 1,25, p = 0.391). (E) Two-way repeated measures ANOVA of d-serine data showed a significant group-and-time interaction (group: F = 0.03, df = 1,25, p = 0.858, time: F = 1.5, df = 1,25, p = 0.232, interaction (group × time): F = 5.0, df = 1,25, p = 0.034).

Figure 6

Fig. 4. (A) Two-way repeated measures ANOVA of the ratio of glutamine to glutamate showed no significant effects and group-and-time interaction (group: F = 1.5, df = 1,25, p = 0.240, time: F = 0.4, df = 1,25, p = 0.546, interaction (group × time): F = 0.2, df = 1,25, p = 0.655). (B) Two-way repeated measures ANOVA of the ratio of glycine to l-serine showed no significant effects and group-and-time interaction (group: F = 0.3, df = 1,25, p = 0.566, time: F = 0.2, df = 1,25, p = 0.628, interaction (group × time): F = 0.1, df = 1,25, p = 0.709). (C) Two-way repeated measures ANOVA of the ratio of l-serine to d-serine showed no significant effects and group-and-time interaction (group: F = 0.1, df = 1,25, p = 0817, time: F = 2.7, df = 1,25, p = 0.114, interaction (group × time): F = 1.8, df = 1,25, p = 0.195).