I. INTRODUCTION
Many members of the garnet-group minerals are birefringent. The various reasons given as the cause of the birefringence were recently discussed (Antao and Klincker, Reference Antao and Klincker2013). Antao (Reference Antao2013a, Reference Antao2013b) and Antao and Klincker (Reference Antao and Klincker2013) proposed a multi-phase intergrowth of slightly different structural (unit-cell and bond distances) and chemical compositions that gives rise to strain, as the only cause of the anisotropy in garnets. This study examines the crystal structure of a birefringent andradite–grossular sample from Crowsnest Pass, southern Alberta. The sample was examined using electron microprobe analyses (EMPA), single-crystal X-ray diffraction (SCD), and high-resolution powder X-ray diffraction (HRPXRD). The EMPA results indicate that the sample is chemically homogeneous, so the multi-phase intergrowths occur on a fine scale. The SCD technique indicates a single-phase sample, but the HRPXRD technique shows a three-phase intergrowth. Such intergrowths cause strain because of structural mismatch, which makes the sample birefringent under cross-polarized light. Preliminary reports were presented (Antao et al., Reference Antao, Klincker and Round2013a, Reference Antao, Klincker and Round2013b).
Several structure refinements for different garnets in the cubic space group
$Ia\overline 3 d$
are available (e.g., Novak and Gibbs, Reference Novak and Gibbs1971; Basso et al., Reference Basso, Cimmino and Messiga1984a, Reference Basso, Cimmino and Messiga1984b; Sacerdoti and Passaglia, Reference Sacerdoti and Passaglia1985; Armbruster et al., Reference Armbruster, Birrer, Libowitzky and Beran1998; Ferro et al., Reference Ferro, Galli, Papp, Quartieri, Szakall and Vezzalini2003; Adamo et al., Reference Adamo, Gatta, Rotitoti, Diella and Pavese2010). However, the structure for some birefringent garnets was also refined in non-cubic, lower symmetry space groups (e.g., Takéuchi et al., Reference Takéuchi, Haga, Umizu and Sato1982; Nakatsuka et al., Reference Nakatsuka, Yoshiasa, Yamanaka, Ohtaka, Katsura and Ito1999; Wildner and Andrut, Reference Wildner and Andrut2001; Shtukenberg et al., Reference Shtukenberg, Popov and Punin2005; Frank-Kamenetskaya et al., Reference Frank-Kamenetskaya, Rozhdestvenskaya, Shtukenberg, Bannova and Skalkina2007). Based on the cubic structure refinements of garnet given in the literature, several structural trends across the garnet series were observed (Antao, Reference Antao2013a, Reference Antao2013b; see Figure 4).
The general chemical formula for garnet is [8]X3 [6]Y2 [4] Z3 [4]O12, Z = 8, space group
$Ia\overline 3 d$
, where the eight-coordinated dodecahedral X site contains Mg, Ca, Mn, or Fe2+ cations, the six-coordinated octahedral Y site contains Al, Fe3+, Ti4+, or Zr4+ cations, and the four-coordinated tetrahedral Z site contains Si, Fe3+, or Al cations, or (F, O4H4) (Novak and Gibbs, Reference Novak and Gibbs1971; Takéuchi et al., Reference Takéuchi, Haga, Umizu and Sato1982; Smyth et al., Reference Smyth, Madel, McCormick, Munoz and Rossman1990; Griffen et al., Reference Griffen, Hatch, Phillips and Kulaksiz1992; Armbruster et al., Reference Armbruster, Birrer, Libowitzky and Beran1998; Chakhmouradian and McCammon, Reference Chakhmouradian and McCammon2005).
The crystal structure of garnet consists of alternating ZO4 tetrahedra and YO6 octahedra with X cations filling the cavities to form the XO8 dodecahedra. The eight O atoms in the XO8 polyhedra occur at the corners of a distorted cube (Figure 1). The O atom is bonded to two X, one Y, and one Z in a tetrahedral configuration.
(Color online) Projection of the garnet structure down c showing the ZO4 tetrahedra, YO6 octahedra, and XO8 dodecahedra where the eight O atoms occur at the corners of a distorted cube.
II. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
A. Sample characterization
The andradite–grossular sample occurs in an extrusive alkaline igneous complex at Crowsnest Pass, southern Alberta, Canada. The sample was collected on a road cut on highway 3, near the town of Coleman. Phenocrysts of andradite–grossular occur with aegirine-augite, sanidine, analcime, and plagioclase in trachyte and phonolite volcanic flows, agglomerates, and tuffs (Dingwell and Brearley, Reference Dingwell and Brearley1985). Some andradite–grossular crystals are chemically zoned; the Fe and Ti contents decrease from the core to the rim (Hilton, Reference Hilton2000). The euhedral andradite–grossular crystals used in this study are dark brown to black in color, about 4 mm in diameter, and show low birefringence in cross-polarized light (Figure 2). In plain-polarized light, lamellar features are observed [Figure 2(a)]. The sample shows fine-scale tweed-like features [Figure 2(b)].
(Color online) Optical microscopy thin-section images for the andradite-grossular from Crowsnest Pass: (a) plane-polarized light (ppl) and (b) cross-polarized light (xpl). The lamellar features are contained in (a). Fine-scale tweed-like features occur in (b). The scale bars represent 50 μm (top left).
B. Electron microprobe analysis
The Crowsnest Pass sample (≈2 mm in diameter) was analyzed by using a JEOL JXA-8200 WD-ED electron-microprobe analyzer (EMPA). The JEOL operating program on a Solaris platform was used for ZAF correction and data reduction. The wavelength-dispersive operating conditions were 15 kV accelerating voltage, 20 nA beam current, and a beam diameter of 5 μm. Various minerals were used as standards [e.g., almandine-pyrope (MgKα), grossular (CaKα), almandine (FeKα, AlKα, and SiKα), rutile (TiKα), spessartine (MnKα), and chromite (CrKα)]. The sample appears homogeneous based on EMPA data from eight spots from different areas of the crystal (Table I). However, the structure refinement of the three phases shows small variations in their compositions. The intergrowth of the three phases occurs on a fine scale that cannot be resolved by EMPA.
Electron microprobe analysis a of andradite–grossular from Crowsnest Pass, Alberta, Canada.
a EMPA data were analyzed by using the spreadsheet from Locock (Reference Locock2008). The estimated standard deviation in brackets is based on the average analyses from eight spots. Numbers in bold indicate significant end-members.
C. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction
A suitable single crystal of andradite–grossular, which may consist of three phases, was selected with a binocular microscope and mounted on a glass fiber for SCD using a Nonius KAPPA APEX II CCD 4-circle X-ray diffractometer equipped with graphite monochromated Mo Kα radiation. The intensity data were obtained in the ω–ϕ scanning mode with the goniometer and detector angular settings optimized. The unit-cell parameter and the orientation matrices were obtained by using the entire reflection dataset collected at 23 °C. The diffraction spots were measured in full, scaled with SCALEPACK, corrected for Lorentz-polarization, and integrated using DENZO (Otwinowski and Minor, Reference Otwinowski, Minor, Carter and Sweet1997). The structure was refined with SHELXL-97 using a full-matrix least-squares refinement on F 2 (Sheldrick, Reference Sheldrick1997; Table II). Scattering curves for neutral atoms were used. Atom positions and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters are given in Table IV, anisotropic displacement parameters are given in Table V, and bond distances are given in Table VI. A list of the observed and calculated structure factors is available as supplemental data (available online at http://www.journals.cambridge.org/PDJ).
Single-crystal (SCD) data for andradite–grossular.
D. Synchrotron HRPXRD
The andradite–grossular sample was studied by HRPXRD that was performed at beamline 11-BM, Advanced Photon Source (APS), Argonne National Laboratory (ANL). A small fragment (≈2 mm in diameter) of the sample was crushed to a fine powder (<10 μm in diameter) using an agate mortar and pestle. The crushed sample was loaded into a Kapton capillary (0.8-mm internal diameter) and rotated during the experiment at a rate of 90 rotations per second. The data were collected at 23 °C to a maximum 2θ of about 50° with a step size of 0.001° and a step time of 0.1 s per step. The HRPXRD trace was collected with twelve silicon (111) crystal analyzers that increase detector efficiency, reduce the angular range to be scanned, and allow rapid acquisition of data. A silicon (NIST 640c) and alumina (NIST 676a) standard (ratio of ⅓ Si : ⅔ Al2O3 by weight) was used to calibrate the instrument and refine the monochromatic wavelength used in the experiment (Table III). Additional details of the experimental setup are given elsewhere (Antao et al., Reference Antao, Hassan, Wang, Lee and Toby2008; Lee et al., Reference Lee, Shu, Ramanathan, Preissner, Wang, Beno, Von Dreele, Ribaud, Kurtz, Antao, Jiao and Toby2008; Wang et al., Reference Wang, Toby, Lee, Ribaud, Antao, Kurtz, Ramanathan, Von Dreele and Beno2008).
HRPXRD data and Rietveld refinement statistics for andradite-grossular.
aLY is related to the strain and these values are quite large compared to a single-phase grossular from Montana, where LY = 5.0(1) (Antao, Reference Antao2013a).
bBased on thin film, both the strain and birefringence between the substrate and film are proportional to Δa = (a substrate –a film) (Kitamura and Komatsu, 1978).
cOverall R (F 2) = R-structure factor based on observed and calculated structure amplitudes = [∑(F o 2 – F c 2)/∑(F o 2)]1/2.
E. Rietveld structure refinement
The HRPXRD data were analyzed by the Rietveld method (Rietveld, Reference Rietveld1969), as implemented in the GSAS program (Larson and Von Dreele, Reference Larson and Von Dreele2000), and using the EXPGUI interface (Toby, Reference Toby2001). Scattering curves for neutral atoms were used. The starting atom coordinates, unit-cell parameter, and space group
$Ia\overline 3 d$
, were taken from Antao and Klincker (Reference Antao and Klincker2013). The background was modeled using a Chebyschev polynomial (5 terms). The reflection-peak profiles were fitted using type-3 profile (pseudo-Voigt function with the asymmetrical model; Finger et al., Reference Finger, Cox and Jephcoat1994) in the GSAS program. A full-matrix least-squares refinement was conducted by varying the parameters in the following sequence: a scale factor, unit-cell parameter, atom coordinates, and isotropic displacement parameters. Examination of the HRPXRD trace for andradite–grossular clearly shows the presence of three separate phases with different cubic unit-cell parameters (Figure 3). The three separate phases were refined together with the site occupancy factors (sofs) in terms of Ca, Fe, and Si atoms in the X, Y, and Z sites, respectively. Toward the end of the refinement, all of the parameters were allowed to vary simultaneously, and the refinement proceeded to convergence. The fitted HRPXRD trace for the three-phase refinement is shown (Figure 3).
HRPXRD trace for the andradite–grossular from Crowsnest Pass, together with the calculated (continuous line) and observed (crosses) profiles. The difference curve (I obs – I calc ) is shown at the bottom. The short vertical lines indicate allowed reflection positions. (a) The intensities for the trace and difference curve that are above 20 and 40° 2θ are scaled by factors of ×10 and ×40, respectively. (b) Peak (420) is displayed as an example to show the three-phase intergrowth.
The unit-cell parameters and the Rietveld refinement statistics for the three cubic phases in the andradite–grossular sample are listed in Table III. The atom coordinates, isotropic displacement parameters, and sofs are given in Table IV. Bond distances and angles are given in Table VI.
Atom coordinates a , and isotropic displacement parameters (Å2), and sofs for andradite–grossular.
a aX is at (0, ¼, and ⅛), Y at (0, 0, and 0), and Z at ((⅜, 0, and ¼). For the SCD, U eq. is defined as one third of the trace of the orthogonalized U ij tensor.
bΔ(sof) = sof (refinement) – sof (EMPA).
cΔe = electrons (refinement) – electrons (EMPA).
Anisotropic displacement parameters (Å2) obtained by the SCD for andradite–grossular.
Anisotropic displacement factor exponent takes the form: −2π2[h2a*2 U11+… + 2hka*b*U12].
Selected distances (Å) for andradite-grossular.
These distances are shown in Figure 4 for comparison to published data. For the calculated radii sum distances, radii from Shannon (Reference Shannon1976) were used (X site: Mn2+ = 0.96, Mg = 0.89, Fe2+ = 0.92 Å; Y site: Ti4+ = 0.605, Al = 0.535, Fe2+ = 0.78, Fe3+ = 0.645 Å; Z site: Si = 0.26, Al = 0.39 Å; and O = 1.38 Å). Ca = 1.06 instead of 1.12 Å; this gives more realistic <X–O> distances. *<D–O> = {(Z–O)+(Y–O)+(X–O)+(X′–O)}/4. Based on the EMPA data and the above radii, the radii sum distances are as follows: Z–O = 1.64, Y–O = 2.00, <X–O> = 2.43, and <D–O> = 2.13 Å.
III. DISCUSSION
The andradite–grossular sample has a composition, {Ca2.88Mn2+ 0.06Mg0.04Fe2+ 0.03}Σ3[Fe3+ 1.29Al0.49Ti4+ 0.17Fe2+ 0.06]Σ2(Si2.89Al0.11)Σ3O12 ≈ Adr64Grs20, with Ca2+, Fe3+, and Si4+ as dominant cations in the X, Y, and Z sites, respectively (Table I). The distribution of the cations is indicated by the chemical formula. The EMPA results indicate a homogeneous composition because the intergrowth of the three cubic phases occurs on a fine scale that cannot be resolved by EMPA.
The HRPXRD trace for andradite–grossular clearly shows the presence of three cubic phases within the sample (Figure 3). The crystal structure of the three cubic phases was modeled quite well, as indicated by the reduced χ 2 and overall R (F 2) Rietveld refinement values of 1.384 and 0.0315, respectively (Table III). Splitting of the reflections for different members of the garnet group, as shown in Figure 3, is known but its significance was not fully evaluated. For example, Koritnig et al. (1978) reported splitting of the diffraction peaks in garnet, which is inconsistent with cubic symmetry. Splitting of the diffraction peaks was also observed by Lager et al. (1989) for a synthetic deuterated hibschite garnet, and they used multiple-phase (four cubic phases) Rietveld refinement to analyze their neutron-diffraction data. Splitting of garnet reflections was also reported in several studies that examine high-pressure and high-temperature garnet phases (e.g., Ganguly et al., Reference Ganguly, Cheng and O'Neill1993; Parise et al., Reference Parise, Wang, Gwanmesia, Zhang, Sinelnikov, Chmielowski, Weidner and Liebermann1996; Heinemann et al., Reference Heinemann, Sharp, Seifert and Rubie1997).
The bond distances for the three phases compare well with the other published structures (Figure 4). The a unit-cell parameters for phase-1, -2, and -3 for the Crowsnest Pass andradite–grossular are 12.000 06(2), 12.049 51(2), and 12.019 68(3) Å, respectively, and their corresponding weight % are 62.85(7), 19.14(9), and 18.01(9) (Table III). Hilton (2010) reported a unit-cell parameter of 12.0249 Å for an andradite–grossular sample from the same general locality. The unit-cell parameters are slightly different for the three phases, but they are between the values for uvarovite and andradite (Figure 4). It is interesting to note that this sample contains 0.17 apfu Ti atoms, but it is not in the Ti-andradite region (Figure 4). Data for the andradite–grossular sample, obtained from the HRPXRD and SCD methods, are shown in Figure 4 and they occur to the left of the end-member andradite, whereas most Ti-rich andradites occur to the right (see Antao, Reference Antao2013b). Although the sample contains some Ti atoms, it has significant grossular content, so it plots to the left of the end-member andradite (Figure 4).
The sofs obtained from the refinement are not exactly the same as those calculated from the EMPA analysis, but their values are similar (Table IV). From the HRPXRD refinement, there is a constant Si atom deficiency of about 5% in the Z site, which may indicate minor (O4H4) ↔ SiO4 substitution because the Si–O distance is nearly constant in the three phases (Figure 4). In calculating the chemical formula, a minor amount of Al is placed in the Si site (Table I). The Ca(sof) from the HRPXRD refinement varies from 0.90 to 0.97, hence the average <Ca–O> distance differs by a small amount. The Fe(sof) varies from 0.75 to 0.83, hence the Fe–O distance shows minor variations (Figure 4). The formation of the three-phase intergrowth in garnet in Si-deficient rocks may be related to changes in oxygen fugacity (f O2), activity of SiO2 (a SiO2), etc., as the crystals grow at low temperature that prevents diffusion or homogenization of the sample. Alternatively, the three-phase intergrowth may be the stable form. The intimate contact of the three phases in a crystal causes strain that arises from the structural mismatch and gives rise to the birefringence; similar intergrowths occur in other birefringent garnets (Antao, Reference Antao2013a, Reference Antao2013b; Antao and Klincker, Reference Antao and Klincker2013). HRPXRD is showing that multi-phase intergrowths are quite common in garnet. The strain in the three cubic phases is about the same because each phase occurs in significant quantity (Table III). Their large strain is significantly more than that for a single cubic phase. The strains that can be calculated from the LY values are not very different from the relative differences in the unit-cell parameters (Table III).
(Color online) Structural variations across the cubic garnet-group minerals. The Y–O, Z–O, and average <X–O> distances in various parts of the series vary linearly with the a unit-cell parameter. The mean <D–O> distance varies linearly with the a-parameter across the series (Antao, Reference Antao2013a, Reference Antao2013b). The literature data (solid yellow circles and squares) are based on cubic refinements of the garnet structure. For the hydrogarnets (yellow squares), Y–O and Z–O trend lines, labeled as OH-Gt, are also shown, but such distances from Armbruster (Reference Armbruster1995) were not included in the computation of these trend lines because they are way off. The hydrogarnet <X–O> and D–O distances occur on the general trend lines. Data for the andradite–grossular from Crowsnest Pass, obtained from the HRPXRD and SCD methods, are shown to the left of the end-member andradite, whereas most Ti-rich andradites occur to the right (see Antao, Reference Antao2013b).
In this study, single-crystal data were collected before HRPXRD data showed that the sample consists of three cubic phases. The single-crystal results for the sample match the dominant phase-1 HRPXRD results (Tables II, III, IV, and VI), but miss the other two minor phases (Figure 3). The unit-cell parameter derived from the SCD is 11.9930(9) Å compared to 12.000 06(2) Å obtained from the HRPXRD, which indicates that the HRPXRD is a superior technique to obtain the unit-cell parameters. Moreover, the SCD data are affected by the two other phases in the sample. Most of the published work on garnet has used the single-crystal method, and probably missed the minor phases in multi-phase samples, especially for those garnets that are birefringent. The single-crystal method is an inappropriate technique to examine multi-phase garnet samples that now appear to be quite common, as is being shown by the HRPXRD data (Antao, Reference Antao2013a, Reference Antao2013b; Antao and Klincker, Reference Antao and Klincker2013).
Our SCD study shows that reasonable structural data can be obtained from the samples that consist of multiple phases, but such results are misleading because the minor phases are missed (Figure 4). Moreover, many SCD structure refinements using the cubic space group were performed on birefringent garnet samples (e.g., Smyth et al., Reference Smyth, Madel, McCormick, Munoz and Rossman1990; Armbruster et al., Reference Armbruster, Birrer, Libowitzky and Beran1998). Such birefringent samples probably contain multiple phases. It is important to identify the SCD results in the literature that seem to contain multiple phases, instead of accepting the reasons given for unusual structural parameters. In some cases, it is easy to identify samples that may contain multiple phases from the unreasonable anisotropic displacement ellipsoid for the O atom that elongate along the “Si–O” bond, instead at about 90° to the bond (e.g., Armbruster, Reference Armbruster1995; Peterson et al., Reference Peterson, Locock and Luth1995; Ferro et al., Reference Ferro, Galli, Papp, Quartieri, Szakall and Vezzalini2003). Some other studies may not report or discuss the unusual anisotropic displacement parameters, but simply report isotropic values (e.g., Chakhmouradian et al., Reference Chakhmouradian, Cooper, Medici, Hawthorne and Adar2008).
In this study and those by Antao and Klincker (Reference Antao and Klincker2013) and Antao (Reference Antao2013a, Reference Antao2013b), a general solution to the birefringence problem in garnet is proposed whereby multi-phase intergrowths result in structural mismatch (different unit-cell parameters and bond distances) that gives rise to strain-induced birefringence. Similar intergrowths also occur in other birefringent garnet samples, whereas isotropic garnet occurs as a single-phase, as in the grossular sample from Montana (Antao, Reference Antao2013a). Multi-phase intergrowths are not uncommon and were also observed in the helvine-group minerals (Antao and Hassan, Reference Antao and Hassan2010) and in apatite (Baikie et al., Reference Baikie, Schreyer, Wong, Pramana, Klooster, Ferraris, McIntyre and White2012).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank R. Marr and M. Parvez for help with the EMPA and SCD data collection, respectively. The HRPXRD data were collected at the X-ray Operations and Research beamline 11-BM, Advanced Photon Source (APS), and Argonne National Laboratory (ANL). Use of the APS was supported by the U.S. Dept. of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357. This work was supported with an NSERC Discovery grant and an Alberta Ingenuity Award to SMA.
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS AND METHODS
The supplementary material for this article can be found at http://www.journals.cambridge.org/PDJ
