Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T03:15:56.401Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

What you see and what you get: combining near-infrared spectroscopy with powder diffraction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2017

Helen E. Maynard-Casely*
Affiliation:
Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Kirrawee DC, 2232, Australia
Norman Booth
Affiliation:
Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Kirrawee DC, 2232, Australia
Leo Anderberg
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle, Callaghan, 2308, Australia
Helen E.A. Brand
Affiliation:
Australian Synchrotron, 800 Blackburn Road, Clayton 3168, Australia
Daniel V. Cotton
Affiliation:
School of Physics, UNSW Australia, Sydney 2052, Australia Australian Centre for Astrobiology, UNSW Australia, Sydney 2052, Australia
*
a) Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: helen.maynard-casely@ansto.gov.au

Abstract

Knowledge of the surface composition of planetary bodies comes from a number of sources; such as landers, remote sensing and meteorites. However, the bulk mapping of the composition of planetary surfaces has been undertaken by analysis of reflected sunlight and these data—principally collected in the near-infra-red (IR) region—are notoriously broad and ambiguous. Hence, if laboratory spectra could be tied to physical properties measurements, such as diffraction, this would substantially aid our understanding of processes occurring in these extra-terrestrial environments. This contribution presents the capability of collecting near-IR data at the same time as neutron and synchrotron X-ray diffraction in a range of conditions (low temperature, vacuum, and humidity variations) and highlights two examples where this capability could enhance our understanding of planetary surfaces.

Information

Type
Technical Articles
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 2017 
Figure 0

Figure 1. (Colour online) Adaptations to the sample mounting for the near-IR reflection probe. The sample is placed inside an open vanadium can that is mounted into a copper ring containing a heater and silicon diode temperature sensor (to allow for fine control of temperature within the cryostat). The reflection probe was mounted above the open sample can, with the sample can filled, so that it reached within 5 mm of the reflection probe.

Figure 1

Figure 2. (Colour online) Image detailing the setup of the near-IR spectrometer upon the Powder Diffraction beamline at Australian synchrotron. The sample was condensed onto a thin layer of silica wool wrapped about a 1 mm diameter capillary.

Figure 2

Figure 3. (Colour online) Presentation of the near-IR spectra (left) and neutron powder diffraction patterns (right) of the mineral kaolinite collected simultaneously between 100 and 180 K. In the plot of near-IR data, the colour variation indicates the reflectivity of the sample, and in the diffraction plot the colours signify the intensity change. The neutron diffraction data were collected at a wavelength of 2.41 Å.

Figure 3

Figure 4. (Colour online) Selected near-IR spectra (normalised to 100% at 1200 nm) from the kaolinite collection, with the black marks indicating the wavelength of the principal features discussed in the text.

Figure 4

Figure 5. (Colour online) Presentation of the near-IR spectra (left) and synchrotron powder diffraction patterns (right) collected simultaneously between 100 and 180 K from a sample formed from a 10 wt% MgSO4.H2O solution. The dotted black line indicates the onset of MS11 crystallisation. In the plot of near-IR data, the colour variation indicates the reflectivity of the sample, and in the diffraction plot the colours signify the intensity change. The synchrotron diffraction data was collected at a wavelength of 0.9535 Å.

Figure 5

Figure 6. (Colour online) 100 K diffraction (bottom pattern) and 180 K pattern (top pattern) from Figure 5, with respective fits to the data from a sample formed from a 10 wt% MgSO4.H2O solution. Underneath the patterns tick marks indicating the positions of reflections from Ice Ih (blue) and meridianiite (MgSO4.11H2O or MS 11) (red). In both patterns the contribution from Ice Ih has been modelled with a Pawley fit, and with two phases with slightly different lattice parameters (to account for the sample being formed on the outside of the capillary). The reflections from MS11, being a lot broader, has been modelled with a Rietveld fit to the structure (Peterson et al., 2007). The asterisks indicate an accessory phase, that is not epsomite (MgSO4.7H2O or MS 7) and has not yet been identified.

Figure 6

Figure 7. (Colour online) Selected near-IR spectra from the 10% wt MgSO4.H2O solution collection, with the black marks indicating the wavelength of the principal features discussed in the text. The two sharp discontinuities in the data at 1480 and 1510 nm are attributed to errors arising from the detector.