Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T08:08:37.251Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Halosulfuron-Methyl Degradation from the Surface of Low-Density Polyethylene Mulch Using Analytical and Bioassay Techniques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2017

Timothy L. Grey*
Affiliation:
Professor and Professor, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA 31793
A. Stanley Culpepper
Affiliation:
Professor and Professor, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA 31793
Xiao Li
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Crop and Soil Sciences Department, Auburn University, AL 36879
William K. Vencill
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602
*
*Corresponding author’s E-mail: tgrey@uga.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Vegetable injury and yield loss has occurred when applying halosulfuron to low-density polyethylene mulch (LDPE) prior to transplanting. Research determined vegetable crop response to halosulfuron applied over LDPE mulch from 1 to 28 d prior to transplanting using (1) temperature effects in aqueous solution in laboratory experiments, (2) analytical evaluation of degradation from LDPE under field conditions, and (3) a field bioassay. Halosulfuron stability was evaluated on a thermal gradient table for temperatures at 10 to 42 C for 15 d. Half-life was inversely related to temperatures ranging from 38.5 d at 20 C to 3.2 d at 42 C, with little to no degradation at temperatures of 11 and 15 C. Analytical data indicated that the field half-life of halosulfuron at 26 or 52 g ha−1 applied to LDPE mulch under dry conditions was 2.6 and 2.8 d, respectively. Given the changes in the microclimate effects at the mulch surface by absorption of solar radiation, daily thermal energy quantified halosulfuron degradation (at the same rates) to be 51 and 55 MJ m−2, respectively. At 21 d after treatment (DAT), 90% of halosulfuron had dissipated from the mulch, with none detectable 35 DAT under dry conditions. When watermelon or yellow crookneck squash was transplanted into mulch previously treated with halosulfuron at 79 g ha−1, plant growth and development were equal to nontreated controls as long as there was a 14 d prior to transplant (DPT) interval accompanied by 13.5 cm of rain, or a 17 DPT interval accompanied by 6.2 cm of rain. However, at 79 g ha−1 applied at 9 or 1 DPT in 2013, and 1 DPT in 2014, halosulfuron injured yellow squash and reduced yield and fruit number. Halosulfuron at 79 g ha−1 applied 1 DPT significantly reduced watermelon yield in 2013, which was confirmed by vine length and plant biomass reductions in 2014. Halosulfuron POST controls Cyperus spp. in mulch vegetable production, but time and rainfall are required for dissipation to occur in order to prevent injury and yield loss.

Information

Type
Physiology/Chemistry/Biochemistry
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2017 
Figure 0

Table 1 Environmental data for halosulfuron dissipation from low-density polyethylene mulch in 2013 near Ty Ty, GA.

Figure 1

Figure 1 Time course for hydrolysis of halosulfuron in high-performance liquid chromatography water (pH 7) at different temperatures evaluated on a thermal gradient. Error bars represent standard deviations of four replicates per experiment, with experiments conducted twice and combined for presentation.

Figure 2

Figure 2 Arrhenius diagram for halosulfuron in high-performance liquid chromatography water (pH 7). The line slope indicates activation energy of 85.55 kJ mol−1. The Arrhenius equation was ln k=−10.29(1/T)+31.26, R2=0.975.

Figure 3

Table 2 Degradation constants (k±standard error) and half-lives (t1/2) in days for halosulfuron in aqueous solutions (pH 7) at different temperatures when evaluated on a thermal gradient table.a

Figure 4

Figure 3 Halosulfuron dissipation under dry conditions by rate for low-density polyethylene mulch in Georgia using the exponential decay equation. Nonlinear regression was applied for days after treatment (A) and for cumulative solar radiation (B). The lines represent the first-order regression equation. Data points are the means of replications with bars indicating the standard error of the mean:Days after treatment$$\eqalignno{&\matrix{ {{\rm \quad Halosulfuron}\,53\,{\rm g}\,{\rm ha}^{{{\minus}1}} \,\colon\,} \hfill & {\gamma {\equals}3.03e^{{\left( {{\minus}0.249x} \right)}} } \hfill & {{\rm P}\,\lt\,0.0001} \hfill \cr & {{\rm R}^{2} {\equals}0.901} \hfill \cr {{\rm \quad Halosulfuron}\,26\,{\rm g}\,{\rm ha}^{{{\minus}1}} \,\colon\,} \hfill & {\gamma {\equals}1.27e^{{\left( {{\minus}0.27x} \right)}} } \hfill & {{\rm P}\,\lt\,0.0001} \hfill \cr & {{\rm R}^{2} {\equals}0.944} \hfill \cr } $$Cumulative solar radiation$$\matrix{ {{\rm \quad Halosulfuron}\,53\,{\rm g}\,{\rm ha}^{{{\minus}1}} \,\colon\,} \hfill & {\gamma {\equals}3.10e^{{\left( {{\minus}0.0125x} \right)}} } \hfill & {{\rm P}\,\lt\,0.0001} \hfill \cr & {{\rm R}^{2} {\equals}0.920} \hfill \cr {{\rm \quad Halosulfuron}\,26\,{\rm g}\,{\rm ha}^{{{\minus}1}} \,\colon\,} \hfill & {\gamma {\equals}1.19e^{{\left( {{\minus}0.0136x} \right)}} } \hfill & {{\rm P}\,\lt\,0.0001} \hfill \cr & {{\rm R}^{2} {\equals}0.934} \hfill \cr } $$

Figure 5

Table 3 First-order dissipation rate constants (k) and half-lives (DT50) of halosulfuron from low-density polyethylene mulch for dry scenarios from experiments conducted in August and September of 2013 by time and cumulative solar radiation.

Figure 6

Table 4 Environmental data for halosulfuron dissipation from low-density polyethylene mulch bioassay at Ty Ty, GA.

Figure 7

Table 5 Yellow squash response to halosulfuron applied over mulch prior to transplanting in Ty Ty, GA, in 2013.

Figure 8

Table 6 Yellow squash response to halosulfuron applied over mulch prior to transplanting in Ty Ty, GA, in 2014.

Figure 9

Table 7 Watermelon response to halosulfuron applied over mulch prior to transplanting in Ty Ty, GA, in 2013 and 2014.