Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T05:35:12.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Expression of the histone chaperone SET/TAF-Iβ during the strobilation process of Mesocestoides corti (Platyhelminthes, Cestoda)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2015

CAROLINE B. COSTA
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Genômica Estrutural e Funcional, Laboratório de Biologia Molecular de Cestódeos, and Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Celular e Molecular (PPGBCM), Centro de Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
KARINA M. MONTEIRO
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Genômica Estrutural e Funcional, Laboratório de Biologia Molecular de Cestódeos, and Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Celular e Molecular (PPGBCM), Centro de Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil Departamento de Biologia Molecular e Biotecnologia, Instituto de Biociências, UFRGS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
ALINE TEICHMANN
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Genômica Estrutural e Funcional, Laboratório de Biologia Molecular de Cestódeos, and Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Celular e Molecular (PPGBCM), Centro de Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
EDILEUZA D. DA SILVA
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Genômica Estrutural e Funcional, Laboratório de Biologia Molecular de Cestódeos, and Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Celular e Molecular (PPGBCM), Centro de Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
KARINA R. LORENZATTO
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Genômica Estrutural e Funcional, Laboratório de Biologia Molecular de Cestódeos, and Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Celular e Molecular (PPGBCM), Centro de Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
MARTÍN CANCELA
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Genômica Estrutural e Funcional, Laboratório de Biologia Molecular de Cestódeos, and Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Celular e Molecular (PPGBCM), Centro de Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
JÉSSICA A. PAES
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Genômica Estrutural e Funcional, Laboratório de Biologia Molecular de Cestódeos, and Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Celular e Molecular (PPGBCM), Centro de Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
ANDRÉ DE N. D. BENITZ
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Genômica Estrutural e Funcional, Laboratório de Biologia Molecular de Cestódeos, and Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Celular e Molecular (PPGBCM), Centro de Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
ESTELA CASTILLO
Affiliation:
Sección Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay
ROGÉRIO MARGIS
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Genomas e Populações de Plantas, and PPGBCM, Centro de Biotecnologia, UFRGS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
ARNALDO ZAHA
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Genômica Estrutural e Funcional, Laboratório de Biologia Molecular de Cestódeos, and Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Celular e Molecular (PPGBCM), Centro de Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil Departamento de Biologia Molecular e Biotecnologia, Instituto de Biociências, UFRGS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
HENRIQUE B. FERREIRA*
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Genômica Estrutural e Funcional, Laboratório de Biologia Molecular de Cestódeos, and Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Celular e Molecular (PPGBCM), Centro de Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil Departamento de Biologia Molecular e Biotecnologia, Instituto de Biociências, UFRGS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
*
* Corresponding author:LGEF, Centro de Biotecnologia, UFRGS, Caixa Postal 15005, 91501-970, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. E-mail: henrique@cbiot.ufrgs.br

Summary

The histone chaperone SET/TAF-Iβ is implicated in processes of chromatin remodelling and gene expression regulation. It has been associated with the control of developmental processes, but little is known about its function in helminth parasites. In Mesocestoides corti, a partial cDNA sequence related to SET/TAF-Iβ was isolated in a screening for genes differentially expressed in larvae (tetrathyridia) and adult worms. Here, the full-length coding sequence of the M. corti SET/TAF-Iβ gene was analysed and the encoded protein (McSET/TAF) was compared with orthologous sequences, showing that McSET/TAF can be regarded as a SET/TAF-Iβ family member, with a typical nucleosome-assembly protein (NAP) domain and an acidic tail. The expression patterns of the McSET/TAF gene and protein were investigated during the strobilation process by RT-qPCR, using a set of five reference genes, and by immunoblot and immunofluorescence, using monospecific polyclonal antibodies. A gradual increase in McSET/TAF transcripts and McSET/TAF protein was observed upon development induction by trypsin, demonstrating McSET/TAF differential expression during strobilation. These results provided the first evidence for the involvement of a protein from the NAP family of epigenetic effectors in the regulation of cestode development.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Structure of McSET/TAF gene, deduced amino acid sequence of the encoded protein and phylogenetic relationships. (A) Exon–intron structure as predicted in silico. Numbered grey bars represent exons, lines represent introns, and the cloned region, coding for McSET/TAF amino acids 42–132 (McSET/TAF42–132), is indicated (*); (B) McSET/TAF deduced amino acid sequence and predicted domains, which grey-shadowed amino acids belong to the NAP domain and the C-terminal acidic tail is boxed. The cloned and expressed segment of the protein is underlined; (C) Phylogenetic analysis of McSET/TAF inferred using the Neighbour-Joining method. Branches corresponding to partitions reproduced in less than 50% bootstrap replicates were collapsed. The percentages of replicate trees in which the associated proteins clustered together in the bootstrap test (10 000 replicates) are shown next to the branches. The phylogenetic tree was generated with the full-length McSET/TAF deduced amino acid sequence and orthologous proteins from D. rerio (Dr), D. melanogaster (Dm), E. granulosus (Eg), E. multilocularis (Em), H. sapiens (Hs), M. musculus (Mm), S. japonicum (Sj), S. mansoni (Sm) and T. solium (Ts).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. McSET/TAF gene and protein expression levels in different M. corti developmental stages. (A) The levels of McSET/TAF gene transcripts were normalized to the expression level of PDCD4, PAPB, SR6, CHOREIN and TROPO gene transcripts. Normalized data were submitted to analysis of variance and differences with >5% significance by Duncan test are indicated (*). The bars indicate standard deviation between replicates; (B) McSET/TAF protein levels assessed by immunoblot using anti-McSET/TAF purified IgG. All lanes were loaded with 20 μg of each protein extract and relative McSET/TAF expression levels were normalized against the M. corti tropomyosin band for each sample. In the comparisons between McSET/TAF bands from different samples, the SW band was used as reference, and the relative expression values for all samples are indicated. Expression data were normalized and compared using the IMAGE J software.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Immunolocalization of McSET/TAF in different M. corti developmental stages. Parasite sections (8 μm) were incubated with purified non-immune IgG (upper panel) and purified anti-McSET/TAF42–132 IgG. Recognition of immune complexes was achieved using Alexa 488-conjugated secondary antibodies. DAPI nuclei staining; antibody staining; merged DAPI and antibody images; and bright field images are shown, from left to right, in the first, second, third and fourth columns, respectively. Scale bars: TT images, 200 μm; 24 h-PI and 72 h-PI, and SW images 50 μm.

Figure 3

Fig. A1. Alignment of SET/TAF deduced amino acid sequences from M. corti, selected helminths and model organisms. For each alignment, amino acids which are conserved in all the aligned sequences are printed in white on a black background; amino acids conserved in at least five of the aligned sequences are printed in black on gray background; and amino acids conserved in at least eight of the aligned sequences are printed in white on gray background. The following sequences were used: M. corti (Mc) McSET/TAF amino acid sequence deduced from contig MCOS.contig.01068·30933; Danio rerio (Dr) NCBI no. NP_958876·1; Drosophila melanogaster (Dm) NCBI no. NT_033777·2; Echinococcus granulosus (Eg) GeneDB no. EgrG_000465500·1; Echinococcus multilocularis (Em) GeneDB no. EmuJ_000465500·1; Homo sapiens (Hs) NCBI no. NP_003002·2; Mus musculus (Mm) NCBI no. NP_001191804·1; Schistosoma japonicum (Sj) GeneDB no. Sjp_0002330·1; Schistosoma mansoni (Sm) GeneDB no. Smp_155060·2; and Taenia solium (Ts) GeneDB no. TsM_000881900·1.

Figure 4

Fig. A2. Analysis of expression stability of potential M. corti reference genes by geNorm program. M values obtained for each of the genes analysed are indicated on the figure. Among the ten genes analysed, those with the lowest M values are PDCD4 (M = 0·5), PAPB (M = 0·53), SR6 (M = 0·57), CHOREIN (M = 0·72) and TROPO (M = 0·8). The LRBA gene (M = 1·40) was considered the less stable.

Figure 5

Table A1. Primer sequences used in RT-qPCR experiments, with corresponding Tm and amplicon sizes

Figure 6

Table A2. Structure and characteristics of McSET/TAF gene and encoded protein predicted by different algorithms