Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T12:01:01.166Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The metazoan parasite communities of the Argentinean sandperch Pseudopercis semifasciata (Pisces: Perciformes) and their use to elucidate the stock structure of the host

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 July 2009

J. T. TIMI*
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Parasitología, Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Funes 3350 (7600) Mar del Plata, Argentina
A. L. LANFRANCHI
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Parasitología, Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Funes 3350 (7600) Mar del Plata, Argentina
*
*Corresponding author. Tel: +54 223 4752426. Fax: +54 223 4753150. E-mail: jtimi@mdp.edu.ar
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The use of parasites as biological tags allowed the identification of 3 stocks of Argentinean sandperch, Pseudopercis semifasciata (Cuvier), in the Argentine Sea. A total of 100 specimens caught in 3 zones: Villa Gesell (37°15′S, 57°23′W; n=20), Miramar (38°03′S, 57°30′W–38°44′S, 58°44′W; n=30) and Península Valdes (42°00′–42°45′S; n=50), were examined and 28 parasite species were found, 15 of them being new host records. Both univariate and multivariate analyses identified discrete stocks in each zone. The observed differences were not related to the host size or sex. Each locality was characterized by its own indicator species. Villa Gesell was typified by unidentified cestode plerocercoids, Corynosoma cetaceum and Hysterothylacium sp., Miramar by Heterosentis sp. and Pseudoterranova sp. and Península Valdes by A. simplex s.l. Fishes from both northern localities shared gnathiid pranizae, Corynosoma australe and Grillotia sp. as indicators, whereas Miramar and Península Valdes shared only Trifur tortuosus. The most distant localities showed no indicator species in common. Discriminant analyses of parasite assemblages agreed with populational comparisons in identifying the same set of biological tags, whereas some differences in the identity of indicator species were obtained by similarity analysis. However, the 3 approaches were congruent in identifying Grillotia sp., C. australe and C. cetaceum as indicators of northern localities, and A. simplex s.l. as related to Patagonian waters. Differences among zones could be enhanced by the sedentary habits, limited dispersal and high site fidelity of P. semifasciata, and their spawning in rocky outcrops, which are isolated environments.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009
Figure 0

Table 1. Taxonomic composition, microhabitat, prevalence and mean intensity of parasites of Pseudopercis semifasciata in three zones of the Argentine Sea(The development stage is only indicated for non-adult species.)

Figure 1

Table 2. Relationship between abundance and fish size or sex of selected species (those with prevalence >10%), parasites of Pseudopercis semifasciata in three zones of the Argentine Sea

Figure 2

Fig. 1. Parasites of Pseudopercis semifasciata selected as biological tags in 3 zones off Argentina based on their (a) prevalence and (b) abundance. VG, Villa Gesell; MI, Miramar; PV, Península Valdes.

Figure 3

Table 3. Comparisons of prevalence and abundance of selected parasite species of Pseudopercis semifasciata among three zones of the Argentine Sea

Figure 4

Table 4. Breakdown of average similarity of parasite infracommunities of Pseudopercis semifasciata within sampling localities into contributions from each species(Species are ordered in decreasing contribution in Villa Gesell.)

Figure 5

Table 5. Breakdown of average dissimilarity of parasite infracommunities of Pseudopercis semifasciata between sampling localities into contributions from each species(Species ordered in decreasing contribution to Villa Gesell-Miramar comparison.)

Figure 6

Fig. 2. (a) Sample scores of the first 2 discriminant functions for specimens of Pseudopercis semifasciata in 3 zones of the Argentine Sea. Numbers represent each fish, triangles represent group averages. Circles around group means represent the 90% tolerance regions (e.g. 90% of the observations in a group are expected to lie in this region). 1: Villa Gesell; 2: Miramar; 3: Península Valdes. (b) Lines represent canonical correlations between the first 2 discriminant functions and the parasites of P. semifasciata. As, Anisakis simplex s.l.; Ca, Corynosoma australe; Cc, Corynosoma cetaceum; Gn, Gnathiid praniza; Gs, Grillotia sp.; Ha, Hysterothylacium aduncum; Hs, Hysterothylacium sp.; Mp, Microcotyle pseudopercis; Pa, Paracapillaria argentinensis; Ps, Pseudoterranova sp.; Tt, Trifur tortuosus; Up, unidentified plerocercoid.

Figure 7

Table 6. Discriminant analysis classification showing the numbers and percentages of fish classified in each zone(Rows correspond to group memberships.)