Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T05:30:39.255Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Single-atom dynamics in scanning transmission electron microscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2017

Rohan Mishra
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science; and Institute of Materials Science and Engineering, Washington University, USA; rmishra@wustl.edu
Ryo Ishikawa
Affiliation:
Institute of Engineering Innovation, The University of Tokyo, Japan; ishikawa@sigma.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Andrew R. Lupini
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Technology Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, USA; arl1000@ornl.gov
Stephen J. Pennycook
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore; The University of Tennessee, USA; and Vanderbilt University, USA; steve.pennycook@nus.edu.sg; or msepsj@nus.edu.sg

Abstract

The correction of aberrations in the scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM) has simultaneously improved both spatial and temporal resolution, making it possible to capture the dynamics of single atoms inside materials, and resulting in new insights into the dynamic behavior of materials. In this article, we describe the different beam–matter interactions that lead to atomic excitations by transferring energy and momentum. We review recent examples of sequential STEM imaging to demonstrate the dynamic behavior of single atoms both within materials, at dislocations, at grain and interface boundaries, and on surfaces. We also discuss the effects of such dynamic behavior on material properties. We end with a summary of ongoing instrumental and algorithm developments that we anticipate will improve the temporal resolution significantly, allowing unprecedented insights into the dynamic behavior of materials at the atomic scale.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017 
Figure 0

Figure 1. Atom dynamics on surfaces. Sequential Z-contrast scanning transmission electron microscope images of (a) a single Ir adatom on a MgO(001) surface showing diagonal hops and (b) rotational migration of an Ir3 cluster on a MgO(110) surface. (c) Direct comparison of experimentally observed configurations of an Ir3 cluster on MgO with (d–e) two theoretically predicted configurations. The red dashed line in (d) shows the axis about which the cluster oscillates at a high frequency. (a–c) Scale bars = 0.5 nm. Adapted with permission from Reference 24. © 2015 American Chemical Society.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Atom dynamics in 2D materials. (a) Selected frames from a sequence of scanning transmission electron microscope annular dark-field (STEM ADF) images showing the dynamics of a Si6 nanocluster trapped in a graphene pore with the 3D structure obtained from density functional theory calculations. The highlighted orange Si atom jumped repeatedly from left to right during the image sequence. Scale bar = 0.2 nm.38 (b) Calculated energy barriers (EB) for the conformational transformation (left-hand side of the plot corresponds to the left image). (c) Ten consecutive frames and the final frame (57) from a sequence of STEM ADF images showing the random walk of a graphene divacancy. Scale bar = 1 nm. Reprinted with permission from Reference 39. © 2014 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Single Ce atom diffusion within wurtzite-structured aluminum nitride (w-AlN). (a–g) Selected frames from a sequence of scanning transmission electron microscope annular dark-field images of a w-AlN single crystal doped with Ce viewed along the $\left[ {11\bar 20} \right]$ axis. Single Ce atom locations are marked by white arrowheads in each panel and the observed Ce trace as a function of time is overlaid in (h). Scale bar = 0.3 nm.46

Figure 3

Figure 4. Phase transition of LiMn2O4–δ induced by electron-beam irradiation. (a) Selected sequential Z-contrast scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM) images of LiMn2O4-δ viewed along the [110]spinel direction. Simulated Z-contrast STEM images and structure models of (b) spinel LiMn2O4 and (c) rock salt LiMnO2, respectively. (d) Schematic view of phase transition from spinel to rock-salt structures. (e) Selected Z-contrast intensity profiles along the direction of columns 1–2–1 indicated by black arrows in (a). (f) Z-contrast intensity evolution at Mn columns of 1 or 2 are plotted as a function of time and the simulated Z-contrast intensities are given by dotted lines.52