Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T10:38:51.835Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The schistosome in the mammalian host: understanding the mechanisms of adaptation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2007

J. R. KUSEL*
Affiliation:
Glasgow Biomedical Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8TA, UK
B. H. AL-ADHAMI
Affiliation:
Glasgow Biomedical Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8TA, UK
M. J. DOENHOFF
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Deiniol Road, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, UK
*
*Corresponding author: Glasgow Biomedical Research Centre, 120 University Place, GlasgowG12 8TA, UK. Tel: 0141 330 5471. Fax: 0141 330 4600. E-mail: j.kusel@bio.gla.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In this review, we envisage the host environment, not as a hostile one, since the schistosome thrives there, but as one in which the relationship between the two organisms consists of constant communication, through signalling mechanisms involving sense organs, surface glycocalyx, surface membrane and internal organs of the parasite, with host fluids and cells. The surface and secretions of the schistosome egg have very different properties from those of other parasite stages, but adapted for the dispersal of the eggs and for the preservation of host liver function. We draw from studies of mammalian cells and other organisms to indicate how further work might be carried out on the signalling function of the surface glycocalyx, the raft structure of the surface and existence of pores in the surface membrane, the repair of the surface membrane, the role of the membrane structure in ion channel function (including recent work on the actin cytoskeleton and calcium channels) and the possible role of P-glycoproteins in the adaptation of the parasite to its environment. We are speculative in some areas, such as the suggestions that variability in surface properties of schistosomes may relate to the existence of membrane rafts and that parasite communities may exhibit quorum sensing. This speculative approach is adopted with the hope that future work on the whole organisms and their interactions will be encouraged.

Information

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Top panel shows, by fluorescence microscopy, the labelling of collecting ducts and branches of the excretory system of male adult Schistosoma mansoni with the fluorescent dye resorufin. Side branches issuing from the collecting ducts end very close to the surface (S). Bottom panel shows a male adult Schistosoma mansoni by bright field microscopy, with a clear view of the collecting ducts of the excretory system.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. (A) Schistosomulum produced by syringe passage (Colley and Wikel, 1974) stained with LysoTracker to show the presence of large lysosomes (acid-rich vesicles) (LY) (Al-Adhami et al.2005). (B) Schistosomulum produced by syringe passage (Colley and Wikel, 1974) without fluorescence, stained with methylene blue. (C) Schistosomulum produced by syringe passage (Colley and Wikel, 1974). This has been slightly damaged by poly-L-lysine in the presence of Texas red-labelled bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Tan et al.2003), and shows uptake of the fluorescent protein through the nephridiopore (N) into the excretory tubules (Tub) and adjacent tissue. (D) Adult worms incubated with poly-L-lysine, in the presence of Texas red-labelled bovine serum albumin (BSA). This shows slight areas of damage indicated by the blue fluoresecence of Hoechst 33258, and uptake of the fluorescent protein into the excretory tubules (Tub) in the damaged areas. (E) Higher magnification of the labelled tubules is also shown. (G) Indicates uptake of the fluorescent protein by the activities of the gut.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. This diagram shows some features of the tegument and associated excretory system and highlights some structures and processes that warrant further investigation. The index numbers refer to a few informative references on each subject. (1) Schmidt (1995). (2) Kovbascnuk and Spring (2000) and Platts and Duling (2004). (3) Wuhrer et al. (2006b). (4) Racoosin et al. (1999), Thi et al. (2004) and Tallima and El Ridi (2005). (5) Braschi and Wilson (2006). (6) Davies and Pearce (1995). (7) Lockwich et al. (2000). (8) Jones et al. (2004). (9) Hockley (1973). (10, 11) Mair et al. (2000, 2004). (12) Schechtman et al. (2001). (13) Roberts et al. (1983), Popiel et al. (1985) and Oliviera et al. (2006). (14) Skelly (2005). (15) Greenberg (2005) and Pica-Mattoccia et al. (2007). (16) Hockley and McLaren (1973). (17) Braschi and Wilson (2006). (18, 19) Wilson and Webster (1974), Bogers et al. (1994) and Mecozzi et al. (2000). (20, 21) Sato et al. (2002, 2004). (22, 23, 24) Finken et al. (1994), Bogers et al. (1994) and Oliveira et al. (2006). (25) Tan et al. (2003) and Oliveira et al. (2006).

Figure 3

Fig. 4. This diagram is a summary of some areas for future investigations in skin penetration by cercariae, and subsequent migration and development of schistosomula in the mammalian host. As in Fig. 3, the index numbers refer to informative references in each subject. (1) Cercariae-variability, Grevelding (1995) and Al-Adhami et al. (2001). (2,3) Schistosomula in skin, Angeli et al. (2001), Al-Adhami et al. (2005), Mountford and Trottein (2004) and Curwen et al. (2006). (4,5,6) Schistosomula in the lung, Wilson (1987), El Ridi and Tallima (2006), Trottein et al. (1999a, b) and Chai et al. (2006). (7,8,9) Parasite in the portal vein, Shaker et al. (1998), Wuhrer et al. (2006), LoVerde et al. (2005) and Knobloch et al. (2006). (10,11) Egg secretions, egg extravasation, Schramm et al. (2006), Kanse et al. (2005), Robijn et al. (2005), Wood and Bacha (1983), Ngaiza et al. (1993) and Ashton et al. (2001).