Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-th4rj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T19:17:26.170Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The dramatic retreat of Mount Kenya’s glaciers between 1963 and 1987: greenhouse forcing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Stefan Hastenrath
Affiliation:
Department of Meteorology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, U.S.A.
Phillip D. Kruss
Affiliation:
World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The retreat of the glaciers on Mount Kenya is quantitatively well documented for the intervals 1899–1963 and 1963–1987. The ice recession between 1899 and 1963 was strongly dependent on solar radiation geometry. By contrast, the ice thinning between 1963 and 1987 amounted to about 15 m for all glaciers regardless of topographic location. This suggests that climatic forcings other than solar radiation have become more prominent.

Sensitivity analyses indicate that the energy supply of about 5 W m−2, required to produce the observed ice thinning through melting, can be accounted for by a combination of climatic forcings. The direct effect of changing atmospheric composition (“greenhouse effect”) on the net longwave radiation could have contributed less than 1 W m−2. A warming of 0.0 to 0.2°C would translate into an additional downward-directed sensible heat transfer of 0.0 to 1.4 W m−2. A 0.1 to 0.2 g kg−1 increase in specific humidity would, through savings in the latent heat transfer, contribute 2 to 4 W m−2.

Long-term station records show little warming trend for East Africa itself. However, mid-tropospheric specific humidity trends of about 0.6 g kg−1 over the past two decades in the equatorial belt have been reported in the literature, and considered to be consequences of “global warming” and the “greenhouse effect”.

Viewed in perspective, the ice wastage on Mount Kenya between 1963 and 1987 appears to have been driven primarily by three climatic forcings, conceivably all steered by the “greenhouse effect”: a direct forcing through the net longwave radiation; an indirect forcing through warming and therefore enhanced sensible heat transfer; and another indirect forcing through warming (not necessarily in the region itself), leading to increased (advected) atmospheric moisture, and hence to reduced latent heat transfer, this last line of control being the most important.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1992
Figure 0

Fig. 1.Map of Mount Kenya’s glaciers. The ice extents in 1899, 1963 and 1987 are shown by dotted, broken and solid lines, respectively. The key below lists, for the north and south sides of the mountain and from west to east, the names of glaciers indicated on the map by numbers, with ** denoting a glacier which disappeared between 1963 and 1987, and * ice entities which vanished prior to 1963. Scale 1 : 20000 (sources: Forsehungsuntemehmen Nepal-Him-alaya, 1967; Hastenrath and others, 1989). North side: 12* NW Pigott, 13 Cesar, 14 Joseph, 15* Peter, 16 Northey, 17* Arthur, 18* Mackinder, 1 Krapf, 2 Gregory. South side: 11* Barlow, 10 Tyndall, 9 Heim, 8 Forel, 7 Diamond, 6 Darwin, 5** Melhuish, 4 Lewis, 3* Kolbe.

Figure 1

Fig. 2.Relief diagrams of Mount Kenya and its glaciers. Glacier boundaries in 1899, 1963 and 1987 are entered as heavy solid lines. Contour interval is 25 m and vertical exaggeration is 2 : 1. North/south and east/west sides of block are 2.45 and 2.25 km long, respectively, with vertical lines marking each 50 m. zenith angle of view is 60°. (A): view from southwest azimuth 225°. Non-corner tick marks on west (left) and south (right) sides of block denote 00°09′00″ S and 30°18′30′ E, respectively. Lowest height contour (southwest corner) is 4250 m and highest contour (top center) is 5175 m. With reference to Figure 1, glaciers depicted are from left to right: 11* Barlow, 10 Tyndall, 9 Heim, 8 Forel, 7 Diamond, 6 Darwin, 5** Melhuish, 4 Lewis. (B): view from north-northwest azimuth 335°. Non-corner tick marks on west (right) and north (left) sides of block denote 00°09′″ S and 30°18′30″ E, respectively. Lowest height contour (lower left) is 4275m and highest contour (top center) is 5175m. With reference to Figure 1, the glaciers depicted are from left to right: 2 Gregory, 1 Krapf, 16 Northey, 15* Peter, 14 Joseph, 13 Cesar, 12* NW Pigott.

Figure 2

Table 1.Area of ice cover in 1899, 1963 and 1987, and mean area, volume change and surface lowering in 1963–87

Figure 3

Table 2.Glacier-average mean annual global radiation for 1899, 1963 and 1987, and for the areas vacated by the ice between these dales (Δ), in W m−2. Cloudiness five-tenths except for clear skies during mornings of the January/February and August dry seasons, with topographic shading. The corresponding value for clear sky and no shading is 385 W m−2 for all glaciers and all three epochs. The 1963 to 1987 retreat of Heim could not be resolved, Diamond retreated to one gridpoint, and Melhuish disappeared. Hence, south-side means are computed from Tyndall, Forel, Darwin and Lewis only.

Figure 4

Fig. 3.Surface lowering, ΔH (in m), versus mean solar radiation (average of 1963 and 1987 values), Rad (in W m−2) between 1963 and 1987 for all glaciers. Crosses and dots denote glaciers on the north and south sides of massif, respectively. Glaciers are indicated by letters as follows. North side: Cesar C, Joseph J, Northey N, Krapf K, Gregory G; south side: Tyndall T, Heim H, Forel F, Diamond Di, Darwin Da, Lewis L. (a) clear sky; (b) representative cloud conditions.

Figure 5

Fig. 4.Schematic diagram of three “greenhouse”-induced climatic forcings contributing to the observed ice-thickness change (see section 5). Met longwave radiation due to thermal trapping , downward-directed sensible heat flux Qs, and upward-directed latent heat flux Qe. ΔTa and Δq denote change in atmospheric temperature, and specific humidity, respectively. A energy lists the corresponding change in the energy budget of the ice. indicates change in net longwave radiation related to humidity change; this latter causality chain is shown in thin print to indicate that it is considered to be of subordinate importance.