Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T23:34:52.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Involvement of cAMP and calmodulin in endocytic yolk uptake during Xenopus laevis oogenesis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2011

Melchor Emilio Luque
Affiliation:
Instituto Superior de Investigaciones Biológicas (CONICET), Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Departamento de Biología del Desarrollo, San Miguel de Tucumán
María de los Angeles Serrano
Affiliation:
Instituto Superior de Investigaciones Biológicas (CONICET), Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Departamento de Biología del Desarrollo, San Miguel de Tucumán
María Eugenia Mónaco
Affiliation:
Instituto Superior de Investigaciones Biológicas (CONICET), Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Departamento de Biología del Desarrollo, San Miguel de Tucumán
Evelina Inés Villecco
Affiliation:
Instituto Superior de Investigaciones Biológicas (CONICET), Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Departamento de Biología del Desarrollo, San Miguel de Tucumán
Sara Serafina Sánchez*
Affiliation:
Instituto Superior de Investigaciones Biológicas (CONICET), Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Departamento de Biología del Desarrollo, Chacabuco 461, T4000ILI San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina.
*
All correspondence to: Sara Serafina Sánchez. Instituto Superior de Investigaciones Biológicas (CONICET), Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Departamento de Biología del Desarrollo, Chacabuco 461, T4000ILI San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina. Tel: +54 381 4107214. Fax: +54 381 4247752. e-mail: ssanchez@fbqf.unt.edu.ar
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The aim of the present study was to show the participation and physiological role of calmodulin (CaM) and cAMP during vitellogenin endocytic uptake in the amphibian Xenopus laevis. The results showed a differential distribution of CaM in the ovary follicles during oogenesis. The CaM intracellular localization was not affected by gap junction's downregulation and CaM inhibition did not completely abolished the endocytic activity of oocytes. We showed that cAMP was able to completely rescue the endocytic competence in follicles in which gap junctional communication had been disrupted by octanol. Moreover cAMP was capable of restoring oocyte endocytic capability in the presence of octanol and stelazine, a CaM inhibitor. We propose that, in Vtg uptake regulation, cAMP is upstream of CaM during the endocytic signalling pathway.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011
Figure 0

Table 1 Experimental groups

Figure 1

Figure 1 Immunolocalization of the calcium-binding protein calmodulin in tissue sections of Xenopus laevis ovary. (A–E) Micrographs of ovary sections treated with anti-calmodulin antibody and visualized using Extravidin–biotin system. (A) Note the weak and uniform signal in the previtellogenic oocyte cytoplasm (black asterisk). Follicular cells show a strong signal signifying a noteworthy presence of calmodulin (CaM) (arrowhead). At later stages, the signal become cortical and stronger (white asterisk). (B–D) Higher magnifications of micrograph (A). (E) Control performed without the first antibody. (F) Schematic diagram of stage IV oocyte describing its main characteristics. Roman numerals indicate oocyte stages. fc, follicular cells; n, nucleus; pi, pigment; se, surface epithelium; ve, vitelline envelope; yp, yolk platelets.

Figure 2

Figure 2 Gap junction uncoupling study. (A,B,E,G) Stage IV oocyte cultured without octanol treatment. (C,D,F,H) Treated with 1 mM octanol. (A,C) Follicle cells epithelia examined for phase contrast. (B,D) Fluorescence micrographs of (A,C). (E–H) Micrographs of oocyte sections revealed with alkaline phosphatase system for b-BSA detection (E,F) and treated with anti-calmodulin antibody (G,H). (B) Notice the fluorescence resulting from the dye transference from vitellogenic oocyte to follicle cells in untreated follicles. (D) No fluorescence is observed. (E) Cortical mark (arrowhead) indicated Vtg incorporation corresponding to oocytes with coupled gap junctions. (F) No mark is observed in oocytes with uncoupled gap junctions. (G,H) No difference is observed in calmodulin (CaM) distribution (black asterisk), in both octanol untreated and treated oocytes. n, nucleus; pi, pigment.

Figure 3

Figure 3 Calmodulin immunolocalization and b-BSA detection in tissue sections of oocytes treated and untreated with stelazine. (A–C) Stage IV oocytes without stelazine treatment. (D–F) Oocytes treated with stelazine. (A,B,D,E) Oocyte sections revealed by b-BSA detection. Vtg uptake was observed with and without stelazine treatment (arrowhead). Note the lower and diffused signal in oocytes treated with stelazine. (C,F) Oocytes sections treated with anti-calmodulin (anti-CaM) antibody. No difference is noted in CaM distribution (black asterisk) in both stelazine untreated and treated oocytes. n, nucleus; pi, pigment.

Figure 4

Figure 4 Rescue experiments with dbcAMP. Micrographs of stage IV oocyte sections revealed by b-BSA detection in order to display Vtg incorporation. (A,B) Oocytes cultured with octanol and dbcAMP. The cell-permeable cAMP analogue restored the vitellogenic process (arrowhead). (C,D) Oocytes cultured with octanol, stelazine and dbcAMP. Note that vitellogenesis could be completely rescued (arrowhead) even in the presence of the calmodulin (CaM) inhibitor. n, nucleus; pi, pigment.

Figure 5

Figure 5 Considering these results, we propose a probable mechanism of vitellogenin uptake regulation in which cAMP is located upstream in the signalling pathway with respect to calmodulin (CaM), triggering vitellogenesis. Nevertheless, additional experiments are necessary in order to elucidate the entire regulation process. Continuous line, established process; dotted line, unproved interaction mechanism; dash-dot line, proved but unknown interaction.