Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-kv2lp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-04T05:49:18.055Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Household food insecurity, dietary intake and anaemia among pregnant women in Lilongwe, Malawi: a mixed-methods cross-sectional study with mediation analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2026

William Munthali
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, China
Ying Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, China
Qian Lin
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, China
Lina Yang*
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, China
*
Corresponding author: Lina Yang; Email: ylnly1997@csu.edu.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Anaemia during pregnancy is a public health concern, yet the relationship between household food insecurity, dietary intake and anaemia among pregnant women remains underexplored. This cross-sectional study investigated these associations in 612 second-trimester pregnant women attending antenatal care in Lilongwe, Malawi. Household food insecurity was assessed using the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS), dietary intake via the Semi-quantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire (SQ-FFQ) and anaemia defined as Hb <10·5 g/dL. Results showed that 21·24 % were anaemic, and 69·93 % resided in food-insecure households. Severe food insecurity (adjusted OR (a-OR): 2·58, 95 % CI 1·41–4·71), insufficient intake of energy (a-OR: 1·73, 95 % CI 1·13, 2·66), Fe (a-OR: 1·98, 95 % CI 1·21, 3·24) and vitamin C (a-OR: 1·71, 95 % CI 1·12, 2·59) were significantly associated with a higher likelihood of anaemia, whereas those with a Minimum Dietary Diversity for Women (MDD-W) had a substantially reduced risk compared with those with low dietary diversity (LDD) (a-OR: 0·19, 95 % CI 0·06, 0·61). Dietary diversity partially mediated the association between household food insecurity and anaemia among pregnant women. Findings underscore the need to promote food security, dietary diversity and nutrient intake through targeted health education and staff training. These strategies could reduce anaemia prevalence and improve maternal health outcomes.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society
Figure 0

Table 1. Bivariate association between household food insecurity, anaemia status and maternal characteristicsTable 1 long description.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Percentage distribution of women awarded a DDS for each food group. The percentage was calculated out of 612 women who had a minimum daily intake of 15 g from each food group. DDS, dietary diversity score.

Figure 2

Table 2. Dietary nutrient adequacy, household food insecurity and anaemia statusTable 2 long description.

Figure 3

Table 3. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression on the association between maternal characteristics and anaemiaTable 3 long description.

Figure 4

Figure 2. Logistic plot between household food insecurity and anaemia. Household food insecurity labels: 0 (food secure); 1 (mildly food insecure); 2 (moderately food insecure); 3 (severely food insecure). P < 0·05.

Figure 5

Figure 3. Figure 3 long description.Mediation of DDS on the effect of household food insecurity on anaemia. BootSE, bootstrap standard error; DDS, dietary diversity score; LLCI, lower limit confidence interval; Path a, effect of household food insecurity on DDS; Path b, effect of DDS on anaemia; Path ab, indirect effect of household food insecurity on anaemia; path c’, direct effect of household food insecurity on anaemia accounting for DDS; UPCI, upper limit confidence interval; Magnitude of mediation effect = [path ab/(path c’ effect + path ab effect)] × 100 %.

Figure 6

Figure 4. Themes identified during the qualitative interviews.

Supplementary material: File

Munthali et al. supplementary material

Munthali et al. supplementary material
Download Munthali et al. supplementary material(File)
File 426.2 KB